TonkaJones

I've been a massive fan of both fighters for years for different reasons. Pacquaio for his exciting fighting style & how he's tore through the weight divisions & Mayweather for the sheer skills he has where he can make good boxers look average & looks a class above. I was just devastated that the fight between them didn't occur when it really mattered a couple of years ago & regardless of what's said & who blames who booth sides must be partially responsible. All I read on here if anybody praises Mayweather they get called 'gayweather nuthugger' then rear fraudweather, duckweather. Same when anybody praises Pac you hear Pacroid, ******* & other ridiculous things. So who is out there that is just a fan of boxing & a fan of both fighters & is just dissappointed the fight didn't happen?

The super 6 had its problems with fighters dropping out & fights being postponed but what we did see was the best fighting the best over a course of 2 years and ended up with a clear undisputed champion. Would anyone else like to see more tournaments like this maybe tweaked a bit? If so what weight? I'd love to see Broner at 140 & a super 6 style tournament at that weight? Would like to hear what you've got to say on this irrespective of promotional & tv boundaries that would get in the way

Lets take SMW for example. Andre Ward is WBC champ & is WBA 'super' champ as he also holds the WBC belt making way for a WBA 'regular' champ. Carl Froch is IBF champ & will most likely be facing WBA 'regular' champ Mikkel Kessler this year. If Froch still has IBF belt when they fight what will have to victor? Under the rules wouldn't he be IBF champ & WBA 'super' champ usually? Obviously he can't because Ward is 'super' champ. But then how can he be regular champ if he holds another belt? Is there some ruling I'm missing here or is this a ridiculous situation the WBA have created that rarely occurs & they'll sort it out when it happens? I wouldn't be surprised if they strip the winner of the WBA belt to allow another non- belt holder to win it but could even end up with something as stupid (far-fetched) as WBA super interim champ!

This is not about whether Castillo should have got decision more whether Mayweather would have been less cautious in choosing opponents if he wasn't too wary of losing his undefeated record. I'm a huge Mayweather fan but if he lost that '0' vs Castillo would we have seen him take the Margarito fight & pick him apart? Would we have seen Mayweather-Tszyu at LWW? Would we have seen him fight Pac when it really mattered a few years ago? (not saying only Mayweather is to blame for that one) What else would we have seen? Please discuss