Mr. Lunatic, you are a fine specimen, but Nash must further enlighten you on the magic of GGG. To KO the great Macklin so early was the stuff of legend. Yes, all the greater greats, beat an entry-level great like Macklin, but GGG did it better than anyone. Also, remember, Curtis Stevens was riding the crest of a wave at that time. He was KO'ing people for fun, and when he threw a fictional funeral for GGG, we all believed it. Golovkin beat the finest version of Stevens the world has ever seen for a God-tier victory.
Some decent wins led to Kell Brook, and actually, Chocolate Brownies was better at the higher weight. Golovkin, therefore also beat the best version of Mr. Ebanie Bridges. An elite win. A close, but deserved and great win over the Jacobs Cracker, led to a draw that was really a win vs prime Canelo. Canelo 2, though a loss, was a close win on Nash's scorecard, so, you tell me, what's more important? 3 judges' scorecards and an official win, or being the winner on Nash's scorecard? You and I both know it's option B, and Golovkin was thrilled to learn that he won on Nash's card.
Every great boxer needs a great robbery win on his resume, and Shortychenko has provided that for a few other guys, too, so give GGG his props for adding one to his resume. A decent win over Murata was his real last fight, and one final retirement pension fund and dive vs Canelo, was like Tyson vs Jake Paul, so in many ways, that was another win.
I'm sure now that you have read this, you'll understand why Golovkin has been inducted into the Hall of Fame. Nash out - His Majesty
Nash, the eloquence with which you write is simultaneously mesmerizing and enlightening. I too, hope to one day be able to compose such persuasive arguments hand-in-hand with creative comedic wit (such as GGG overcoming Mr. Ebany Bridges).
In a sea of non-sensical posters and chaos, your insight is nothing short of a much-needed compass we should all aspire to follow. Good day to you, sir.