this dick wagging on whos fought who is funny and boring, it doesnt mean ****, if a man is ready for a test hes ready, tyson is a threat, on boxing ability he can only really fine tune what he has, like wlad did after his loses, wlad is a guy whos nearly 40, fury turned 27 not long ago. just saying you cannot compare them on records.
for example, if hughie fury keeps winning and gains ranking, that will just gain haters on here, in 2-3 years (or maybe less) you probably have retards on this forum saying "who has hughie fury fought" and the kid will be 23-24.
both tyson and hughie are extremely talented for their age, tyson is a threat for people in the division, its the same with hughie, what 30+ year old man wants to get beaten by a undefeated 21 year old and who wants to get beaten by a undefeated 27 year old 6,9 **** talking gyspy.
its a huge risk, unless people are getting forced to fight due to rankings and titles its hard to get people to fight them, they price themselves out or avoid on purpose, most fighters want padded records and development time, at tysons age hes had decent names, compared to lets say... wilder LOL!
the furys also cannot offer people stupid money period, no promoter will overpay someone, the names they have fought have been fairly decent considering. no HW in the world can match wlads record, so on that point its ridiculous talking about.
to be honest in my opinion, in this age of the HW division to beat everyone, you dont need a record or a rein as long as wlads, you just need to beat a few people, povetkin, wilder, wlad, fury and maybe AJ as well when he has a bit longer, then you are the best because truthfully who else is legit? fury has also admitted he wont be in the game for a long time and is pushing for big fights, so hopefully i hope to see fights between these guys. wilder also isnt staying around for long.