Fury interview with True Geordie goes wrong

the problem is 60K brain dead idiots already bought tickets. you have to boycott this fight boyos.

TG was rimming fury.

When Fury says "you little shit house," he's ready to dent some skulls. Says it every time he talks about Usyk which means that's gonna be a good fight.

I’d say they’re fair enough questions because he has fought and beat him twice and never had any trouble with him. It’s not unfair to ask why not another opponent instead. but I never understand why people bring up the likes of Ali and other greats. Did they beat top fighters? Yeah but look at their entire resumes, there was plenty of fighters on the level of a 2022 Chisora too and worse, let’s not make out like every fight they had was against some killer. Ali had loads of knock over jobs too. So I do think todays fighters get held to a different standard. Anyway, we all know Fury crosses over to a mainstream audience in England, so why would he take a keep busy fight against someone the casual fan has never heard of? He can probably make better money in this tune up v Chisora than he could against arguably out there of the level that could be considered a keep busy opponent. That’s just the reality. For me, I don’t think fighting someone on Chisora’s level is bad, if you’re just staying busy and so you’re not out of the ring for a year for a unification fight. Then Chisora would be a perfectly acceptable opponent. It’s just the fact he’s beaten him twice, it just makes it feel a bit pointless but the reality is if they announce Fury v Usyk soon after, then nobody will care that Fury v Chisora 3 happened, it’ll be old news and everyone will have made their money. They under this and that’s why it’s happening. I doubt I’ll be paying for this one though. I do think the comparison to old fighters can be unfair as no one will ever live up to Ali type comparisons in most peoples eyes. But to be fair to the old fighters, back in the day they fought more often so naturally there were the usual mismatches thrown in. They were still fighting the top names in-between. If modern fighters hold a world title and fight, at the most frequent, once a year – then that doesn't give much opportunity for challengers. And if they're fighting 'tune-ups' then maybe they should give up the title. Lots of UFC champs say it's a relief when they eventually lose the title because they're constantly taking on tough opposition. Don't get in the face breaking game if you don't want your face broken.

Wow! The 'Gypsy-Bum' was embarrassed :lol1:

You’re a fan of Fury's downy glutes. You’ve made that obvious on multiple occasions. Very cool that you’re in South Korea!! Are you living there or on holiday? my other half is Korean and she spends her time working between the UK, China and Korea, so we spend about 3 months a year here in South Korea (well before covid, first time I’ve got back here since). I do work here when living here, I can do it from home, or can find places to do the rest of the work if it’s not possible at home sometimes, depending on the piece of work at the time. we’re only out of the UK a month this time though and going to Thailand tomorrow. Funnily enough, we were right in the area where loads of people died in the crush at the weekend but we saw it getting way too busy, so we ended up going to a cinema instead and then got home and saw it all on the news

Small town cretin? Lol what does that mean? I came from the capital city in the UK you idiot…..and I’m currently writing to you from Seoul. You’re the one that’s likely living with your mum in a one horse town, watching her drag her bad leg around the house every day. Not biased at all, nor have I justified this fight. All I said was generally Chisora would be an ok fight for a tick over but not when you have beaten him twice, hence why they won’t get any of my money. I am a fan of Fury the boxer , yes, and had it been another opponent and slightly intriguing fight, I’d have been looking to get tickets but I won’t because the main event doesn’t interest me much and the undercard will be rubbish. You’re a fan of Fury's downy glutes. You’ve made that obvious on multiple occasions. Very cool that you’re in South Korea!! Are you living there or on holiday?

Tyson Fury - 'I don't care about legacy' . Also Tyson Fury in the same interview - 'This fight is history making as I'll be the first champion to win two trilogies'

You’re biased as hell You know it and I know it ‘we both know it’ You’re a fan of individual fighters more than the sport itself. Low IQ? Post your credentials or pipe down you small town cretin Small town cretin? Lol what does that mean? I came from the capital city in the UK you idiot…..and I’m currently writing to you from Seoul. You’re the one that’s likely living with your mum in a one horse town, watching her drag her bad leg around the house every day. Not biased at all, nor have I justified this fight. All I said was generally Chisora would be an ok fight for a tick over but not when you have beaten him twice, hence why they won’t get any of my money. I am a fan of Fury the boxer , yes, and had it been another opponent and slightly intriguing fight, I’d have been looking to get tickets but I won’t because the main event doesn’t interest me much and the undercard will be rubbish.

Yea he was trying to make it happen ,he even refused to meet me half way years ago so he’s done I get it when no one wants to actually fight and it would have been really dumb on his part . But besides Larry who hasn’t said much to me what about you ,are you bored ,why don’t you take it then if your that interested and in the states if not why are you even talking to me ? How about this let’s post a pic of our current state and see who looks like what since your so interested in me ? I bet I make you look foolish and I’m 48 ? 48 and trying to organise to meet up for a fight online? Damn, you're down bad

At the end Fury says he won't be giving him anymore interviews, which is precisely why other interviewers avoid these types of questions and just kiss his ass instead. It's pathetic.

Biased by saying I won’t pay for the fight? Biased by saying they were fair questions he asked Fury? Biased by saying it’s essentially a stay busy fight where they are maximising revenue without really taking any risk? Ok There’s not any point in my message where I defended the fight, I just spoke facts about why it was happening, just like I spoke facts that the likes of Ali fought a lot of knockover jobs too, so I don’t understand why people bring up old fighters to make comparisons. I think you’re the one whose mind is skewed if you read my post and saw me being biased, but I guess it only shows your low IQ. It's probably the bit where you tried justifying this fight.

I actually thought the questions were very respectful and exactly what we are asking. Fair play. Thought this dude was just a basic YouTuber, but thats some solid questioning that got Tyson shook. Would like to see more of this type of thing Yeah they were good questions. Kugan Cassius could learn a thing or two from that interview

I actually thought the questions were very respectful and exactly what we are asking. Fair play. Thought this dude was just a basic YouTuber, but thats some solid questioning that got Tyson shook. Would like to see more of this type of thing

Tyson just didn't want to be there, he knows the Chisora fight is sht, he is agitated and doesn't like to be needled with some home truths.

Lol Fury couldn't handle the pressure here fair play to the guy for grilling Fury on this bullshit fight and not kissing his ass, was awkward af at the end when Fury was fumbling to turn off the camera. I'm a Fury fan but this fight is bollocks everybody knows it and its about time somebody questioned him about it.

Biased by saying I won’t pay for the fight? Biased by saying they were fair questions he asked Fury? Biased by saying it’s essentially a stay busy fight where they are maximising revenue without really taking any risk? Ok There’s not any point in my message where I defended the fight, I just spoke facts about why it was happening, just like I spoke facts that the likes of Ali fought a lot of knockover jobs too, so I don’t understand why people bring up old fighters to make comparisons. I think you’re the one whose mind is skewed if you read my post and saw me being biased, but I guess it only shows your low IQ. The difference is, Muhammad Ali made 19 successful World Championship defenses. 23 successful Champion fights. And had total of 27 Championship fights. This is Tyson Fury's 3rd World Championship defense. And he has a total of 5 Championship fights. So there is no real comparison between Fury and some of the past great Champions. But even still? I am not one of these people who have a issue with the fight 'Because I know this is Fury's style of being champion and match making'. Tyson Fury in between big fights, likes to drop back down in levels and fight at domestic to high end European level. Outside of Kiltschko & Wilder, Fury's resume is predominately fights at domestic to high end European level. So here we are again, back at that level. I think it is good match making, for a ticking over fight. It is a intriguing match up, and there is a theme to the fight.

Biased by saying I won’t pay for the fight? Biased by saying they were fair questions he asked Fury? Biased by saying it’s essentially a stay busy fight where they are maximising revenue without really taking any risk? Ok There’s not any point in my message where I defended the fight, I just spoke facts about why it was happening, just like I spoke facts that the likes of Ali fought a lot of knockover jobs too, so I don’t understand why people bring up old fighters to make comparisons. I think you’re the one whose mind is skewed if you read my post and saw me being biased, but I guess it only shows your low IQ. You’re biased as hell You know it and I know it ‘we both know it’ You’re a fan of individual fighters more than the sport itself. Low IQ? Post your credentials or pipe down you small town cretin

You’re a biased bellend Biased by saying I won’t pay for the fight? Biased by saying they were fair questions he asked Fury? Biased by saying it’s essentially a stay busy fight where they are maximising revenue without really taking any risk? Ok There’s not any point in my message where I defended the fight, I just spoke facts about why it was happening, just like I spoke facts that the likes of Ali fought a lot of knockover jobs too, so I don’t understand why people bring up old fighters to make comparisons. I think you’re the one whose mind is skewed if you read my post and saw me being biased, but I guess it only shows your low IQ.

I’d say they’re fair enough questions because he has fought and beat him twice and never had any trouble with him. It’s not unfair to ask why not another opponent instead. but I never understand why people bring up the likes of Ali and other greats. Did they beat top fighters? Yeah but look at their entire resumes, there was plenty of fighters on the level of a 2022 Chisora too and worse, let’s not make out like every fight they had was against some killer. Ali had loads of knock over jobs too. So I do think todays fighters get held to a different standard. Anyway, we all know Fury crosses over to a mainstream audience in England, so why would he take a keep busy fight against someone the casual fan has never heard of? He can probably make better money in this tune up v Chisora than he could against arguably out there of the level that could be considered a keep busy opponent. That’s just the reality. For me, I don’t think fighting someone on Chisora’s level is bad, if you’re just staying busy and so you’re not out of the ring for a year for a unification fight. Then Chisora would be a perfectly acceptable opponent. It’s just the fact he’s beaten him twice, it just makes it feel a bit pointless but the reality is if they announce Fury v Usyk soon after, then nobody will care that Fury v Chisora 3 happened, it’ll be old news and everyone will have made their money. They under this and that’s why it’s happening. I doubt I’ll be paying for this one though. You’re a biased bellend