How many belts do you think boxing should have?

I personally think 2 unification can be fun but 4 is way to much your thoughts? I believe 2 belts per division is the answer and here is my own opinion as to why.. - 2 belts are easier to have unification bouts with - more belts you have more you have to pay for organizations and have mandatory bouts etc for e.g. if you were to have the WBC/WBA/WBO/IBF/IBO belts you would have to vacate one or more belts sooner or later because off all the fees and face the mandatory challengers.. - Lastly too many belts per division is no good, they should scrap the WBA/WBC and IBO because their off no use.. Instead keep the IBF and WBO belts as they seem the lesser evil out off the five since the WBC and WBA are mostly crooked....plus the IBO well I don't really see the big relevance with them tbh.. Don't get me wrong IBF has a sketchy past too with some off it's past champions but I'd rather them and the WBO remain..

]1 belt per division with ibf's rules. 1 belt with wbc/wba idiotic behaviour would be useless. every mandatory fight and eliminator would essentially be what unifications are now. we would get unification quality fights every year in every division (at least two of them). interim title is fine when a champion can't defend for at least a year. any other change wouldn't satisfy me. This. No BS mcdonald's franchise champion or super duper big Mac champion. One champion per division.

At least ten. Top 10 in every division should have a belt, and they should never fight each other. Here here :439:

Yeah id say 2 it still give. Ppl a chance to get the belt yet also build up the hype of champ vs champ fight plus cause 2 belts dont oversaturate the market we could think of it like bellator vs ufc if they fought champ vs champ every 2 yrs like how soccer does olympics n would cups so technically theres a big match every 2 yrs between the national teams

There's only 1 world. So how can you have more than 1 world champion? We need to redefine the divisions and have 1 champion per division. But that guy HAS to fight the top contenders or he gets stripped.

I personally think 2 unification can be fun but 4 is way to much your thoughts? 1 world title in each weight class. Also have North American, South American, Europe, African and pan Asian titles is each division.

the top 4 promotions Top Rank, Goldenboy, Pbc and Matchroom should each have 1 champion per division. Each promotion should take part in a WBSS tournie fight once a year. Make it a league format where every 4 years it's the promotion that wins the tournie. The promotion should put up a cash prize that forces 'the best' to take part and not duck. If their champion is in sudden suicidal depression or injured, or has 'coronavirus' then the promotion picks someone else.

I'm fine with 4 just don't want the extras Super etc. Also would like if organizations would work together to do more Unifications . In a perfect world I'd say just 1 title and 1 intern title but whichever promoter is in control of the title would keep the fights in house . Unless organizations can Mandate better fights more often I agree and I'm also fine with four (WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO). I can do without the super, interim, regular, gold, silver, ect.

At least ten. Top 10 in every division should have a belt, and they should never fight each other. I agree. It should be like karate class, where everybody gets a belt based on ranking.

1 belt per division with ibf's rules. 1 belt with wbc/wba idiotic behaviour would be useless. every mandatory fight and eliminator would essentially be what unifications are now. we would get unification quality fights every year in every division (at least two of them). interim title is fine when a champion can't defend for at least a year. any other change wouldn't satisfy me.

1 belt with no catch weights with a belt on the line

I'm fine with 4 just don't want the extras Super etc. Also would like if organizations would work together to do more Unifications . In a perfect world I'd say just 1 title and 1 intern title but whichever promoter is in control of the title would keep the fights in house . Unless organizations can Mandate better fights more often

At least ten. Top 10 in every division should have a belt, and they should never fight each other. Lol sounds legit.

One is the obvious answer, but anything less than what he have now is what we can hope for and that's still a long shot. We're more likely to see even more titles than less.

At least ten. Top 10 in every division should have a belt, and they should never fight each other.