Canelo/Smith reaction from Peter Fury - brilliant analysis.

Not sure most people realise the gulf in class between a Smith and Canelo, experience-wise alone. Peter basically says the same in this video....... this was Smith's Mayweather, comparatively to Canelo at 23. Smith can either go on and do damage at 175 and learn, or he just becomes an ex-champion. That's a massive over simplification. People get doe eyed and listen to old dudes like John Fury and Peter Fury like they are guru's sitting on a rock at the top of a mountain spitting esoteric and sage knowledge. There is nothing special about this "brilliant analysis". His whole point can be boiled down to "there was a gulf in class between the two fighters." Yeah, nice one guru, keep em coming.

Haha all good. :beerchug: I agree that the official decision, decided by three people, went for Canelo by a single point, in 24 rounds of fight. But besides those three people, of the hundreds of thousands watching, most of them thought that GGG won, including myself. Yeah I agree. There were lots of people that thought the decision was wrong in both fights.

Smith said it took only one shot away, said he could jab with it no problems. You dont have to stop everybody to be great I dont understand some of you guys, you seem to think its all to easy, its a way different deal in there than you looking at your monitor, Smith was an unbeaten WC with a big size advantage, Canelo didnt go all out to stop him he just beat him up and won easy. I'm responding to some who think Canelo has devastating power. He doesn't. He has excellent power you surely aren't going to just run up at him but devastating power no. He couldn't stop Smith a fighter with an injury but knocked out Kovalev. That tells me more about the state of Kovalev's punch resistance than Canelo's power.

Haha all good. :beerchug: I agree that the official decision, decided by three people, went for Canelo by a single point, in 24 rounds of fight. But besides those three people, of the hundreds of thousands watching, most of them thought that GGG won, including myself. Come on. I can respect Your opinion of who You think won. But you add the whole "Hundreds of Thousands watching" thing is a stretch. And please don't link me to some semi- official poll bro. It'll just lead to a back and forth. IMO the correct way for you to say it would be something like " two Close fights with Controversial decisions".

No I did not: https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=857666 Damn. You got me there. My bad. First Canelo / GGG fight was close IMO. So a draw was ok. Second fight Canelo won. You might not agree with the decision. But saying GGG won as if it's a fact doesn't change the actual decision.

Smith tearing his bicep had a lot to do with Canelo's dominate victory. He most likely would have won anyway but he couldn't stop a severely injured fighter. Smith said it took only one shot away, said he could jab with it no problems. You dont have to stop everybody to be great I dont understand some of you guys, you seem to think its all to easy, its a way different deal in there than you looking at your monitor, Smith was an unbeaten WC with a big size advantage, Canelo didnt go all out to stop him he just beat him up and won easy.

Nobody's shouting till their lungs collapse. You're the Canelo rider who thinks that way. Every single public opinion poll with tens of thousands of people voting had GGG winning. Spectators worldwide know what they saw. But I'm sure you agreed with the 118-110 card. nah to the scorecard, but does it matter? not a rider, he deserved a close win he should've lost the first one but meh its not gonna change anything. all those spectators worldwide arent gonna change anything homie

Smith tearing his bicep had a lot to do with Canelo's dominate victory. He most likely would have won anyway but he couldn't stop a severely injured fighter.

Vlad is right. One thing is to mob something out of people, the other is to do the right thing. Both nights the right thing was not done and that is to have Golovkin win both nights. He won in the eyes of every professional out there, he was given a gift like he was in other fights before.

A past prime, on the slow decline GGG beat Canelo twice, so there’s that... I'ma take a wild guess and say you also thought Lomachenko beat Teofimo right ?

Canelo didn’t get shit. The people backing him were able to tilt the judging in Canelo’s favor. Nowhere did Canelo show that he was stronger than GGG. I feel bad for sorry ppl like u. Hold on to that belief and keep shouting till your lungs collapse Canelo still beat GGG, nothing is gonna change that

A past prime, on the slow decline GGG beat Canelo twice, so there’s that... It's funny how people try to convince themselves that anything other than that happened

Actually Canelo started doing VADA testing then looked better in the second Golovkin fight. 2017 canelo 'beats' ggg 2018 canelo eats his meat, serves his ban & beats ggg conclusion: good meat or something else

ggg beat canelo in the first fight canelo took steds then beat ggg in the rematch Actually Canelo started doing VADA testing then looked better in the second Golovkin fight.

ggg beat canelo in the first fight canelo took steds then beat ggg in the rematch

A past prime, on the slow decline GGG beat Canelo twice, so there’s that... Fantasy doesnt turn into reality because you would rather the fantasy, close fights Canelo got the second one thats all she wrote.

Pretty sure everyone knows there are levels to boxing. But not many in here know where those levels are .

Pretty sure everyone knows there are levels to boxing. Not sure most people realise the gulf in class between a Smith and Canelo, experience-wise alone. Peter basically says the same in this video....... this was Smith's Mayweather, comparatively to Canelo at 23. Smith can either go on and do damage at 175 and learn, or he just becomes an ex-champion.

Pretty sure everyone knows there are levels to boxing.