I told all of you here after the Dec 2018 fight that the Tyson we saw was "the best Tyson Fury you will ever see".
I explained that the Fury that Wilder fought had been in the gym a year, had the benefit of 2 tune-ups (possibly vs tougher competition than he has fought since Deontay), and had over 2 months of prep time since losing weight was no longer an issue by August.
Some of you scoffed at my take.
I wonder what those of you who did so think now.
I wonder what those of you who denigrate Wilder's skill level and resume would say if it was Deontay in there last night, getting bloodied and going 12 rugged rounds with a guy not even in the top 45.
Takes all kinds I guess...
- -It rebounded off the noggin of his opponent, defuse by then .
Whereas you extinct thousands of years ago.
:lol1:
People still get salty when that uppercut gets brought up.....
Remember when Fury uppercut himself in the face?
- -It rebounded off the noggin of his opponent, defuse by then .
Whereas you extinct thousands of years ago.
The truth is that Wallin is a better boxer than Wilder, not nearly as dangerous but better skilled.
No, the difference wasn’t Fury, it was the opponent
You would think every top heavyweight in history had knocked out everybody
Go check the records of Ali, Frazier, etc.. their records are full of decision wins against lower level contenders
The best Fury was the one who fought Klitschko, Chisora 2 and Hammer...
This Fury was as good as the one that fought Wilder. It's just that Wilder is not great at all that Fury looked good Vs Him. It didn't mean he was back to his former self