Has Wilder been ducking Andy Ruiz?

I just ****ing told you why I got a problem with Al haymon. Its got nothing to do with colour. What you do is hint at racism but get all twisty when it's time to confirm that you are accusing ppl of being racists. If you guna say it grow some balls and say it, or stop hinting at it. Personally I think it just highlights your own racism. I'm not guna mince around like a fairy I just say it if I think it, you sir are a racist who just presumes white people are all secret racists which in my eyes makes you an anti white racist. And I don't even think you realise half the people your accusing of being white racists are not even white, you just presume cuz they speaking I'll of Al haymon. That's how narrow minded and racist you are. You gave a n opinion about what Ortiz should do. You have no idea if he cost him money or made him money. So your reasoning is fake and everyone can see through it. I posted why I had an issue with your post. If I thought you were a racist I'd post that as I have with any other poster. The only reason it "hints at racism" to you is because I called you out for labelling a black man that has a BA and MBA from Harvard and no criminal record a "con man". Is there another reason other than his race why you did that? Only you know. It surely isn't because he didn't allow Ortiz to fight AJ. I didn't presume anything. I asked you a question based on your post. You gave a BS response, which I refuted with facts. Now you are flat out lying. I didn't post or imply you were white or a racist. I posted that you're only calling him a con man and bad for the sport because he is black and has tried to put the sport under one umbrella. That doesn't make you white by default. I supported that claim by pointing out how you were in favor of this when other promoters tried to do same. Notice you didn't refute that point or post I was incorrect.

I'm just commenting on why you labeled Haymon as a con man and bad for boxing and pointing out the facts don't support either opinion. I just ****ing told you why I got a problem with Al haymon. Its got nothing to do with colour. What you do is hint at racism but get all twisty when it's time to confirm that you are accusing ppl of being racists. If you guna say it grow some balls and say it, or stop hinting at it. Personally I think it just highlights your own racism. I'm not guna mince around like a fairy I just say it if I think it, you sir are a racist who just presumes white people are all secret racists which in my eyes makes you an anti white racist. And I don't even think you realise half the people your accusing of being white racists are not even white, you just presume cuz they speaking I'll of Al haymon. That's how narrow minded and racist you are.

You saying I got a problem with black people? I'm just commenting on why you labeled Haymon as a con man and bad for boxing and pointing out the facts don't support either opinion.

he has no criminal record that I am aware of and all of his business ventures are legitimate. Why is he bad for boxing? His fighters sell PPV's and he has boxing programming on regular TV and cable. He also made those fighters money. They haven't chosen to leave him. He has given many other fighters title shots and helped them earn millions of dollars. He was accused of violating the Ali act, which was proven to be false. He just had a successful PPV with Manny. He has major PPV fights lined up for all his top guys (Wilder, Spence). He gave us a FOTY candidate at 154 in Hurd/Jrock. You're only calling him a con man and bad for the sport because he is black and has tried to put the sport under one umbrella. If I recall you felt this was something that was a good for the sport, having one person running it as a "commissioner". You saying I got a problem with black people?

Cuz he's a con man. He's bad for boxing he needs taking to court by some of his fighter, especially Luis Ortiz. Cost him millions and a chance at 4 World titles, also wilder as haymon has cost him much more money and the chance at undisputed. Wilder is so mentally dumb he nearly qualified for the special Olympics and con man scum bag al haymon has taken advantage of his fighters and ruined their chances of big fights and big money so he can make his own business moves. Con man needs removing from the sport he has no criminal record that I am aware of and all of his business ventures are legitimate. Why is he bad for boxing? His fighters sell PPV's and he has boxing programming on regular TV and cable. He also made those fighters money. They haven't chosen to leave him. He has given many other fighters title shots and helped them earn millions of dollars. He was accused of violating the Ali act, which was proven to be false. He just had a successful PPV with Manny. He has major PPV fights lined up for all his top guys (Wilder, Spence). He gave us a FOTY candidate at 154 in Hurd/Jrock. You're only calling him a con man and bad for the sport because he is black and has tried to put the sport under one umbrella. If I recall you felt this was something that was a good for the sport, having one person running it as a "commissioner".

Al Haymon earned a BA and MBA from Harvard, one f the most prestigious universities in the world. He has never been arrested. He has run successful, legitimate businesses for decades.Why do you refer to him as a con man? Cuz he's a con man. He's bad for boxing he needs taking to court by some of his fighter, especially Luis Ortiz. Cost him millions and a chance at 4 World titles, also wilder as haymon has cost him much more money and the chance at undisputed. Wilder is so mentally dumb he nearly qualified for the special Olympics and con man scum bag al haymon has taken advantage of his fighters and ruined their chances of big fights and big money so he can make his own business moves. Con man needs removing from the sport

They are both PBC fighters, uncle Al likes to keep his cultish fighters in house where possible. Hes matched Wilder against many other PBC Heavies but not Andy Ruiz Jr? Wilder has never mentioned his name until just recent when it was time for a bit of Deontay Wilder clout chasing. Is he ducking? Wilder, Fury, plenty of Wilder and Deontay Ruiz fans been mocking Joshua for losing to Ruiz but Wildes never fought him or made a move to fight him. Seems a bit strange that their paths have never crossed considering the small stable that the PBC has. Personally i think its a duck, i think con man Haymon has kept Wilder away from YET ANOTHER prime heavyweight, its a shame Ruiz hasnt lost a limb at some point cuz that could of tempted Wilder in for a fight. Al Haymon earned a BA and MBA from Harvard, one f the most prestigious universities in the world. He has never been arrested. He has run successful, legitimate businesses for decades.Why do you refer to him as a con man?

This is such a stupid question

So to the simple mind 8 seconds is now 4 minutes . Four minutes is 4 minutes!!! And some seconds..

Obviously you haven't been paying attention It's not that he can't it's that he won't, his hands are not supposed to be tied. He is a free agent he says so himself.

And what? Wilder can't fight top rank fighters? I'm sure he can. Obviously you haven't been paying attention

You're wrong Nuetral.....their paths did cross at the Pac-Thurman fight. They were seen on set together...two HW champs taking selfies together. :lol1:

Oh no a red k from a dip ****, my day is officially ruined lol. Red K from everyone, which you have, is no coincidence ya dumb f@ck

Andy Ruiz had just recently signed with the PBC earlier this year in 2019. Before then he was a Top Rank fighter. However, by then Wilder was in negotiations with Tyson Fury for a rematch. When that fell through, then Deontay Wilder was forced by the WBC to defend against his mandatory challenger Dominic Breazeale. Meanwhile, Andy Ruiz had a fight with Anthony Joshua a month later and now a subsequent rematch clause in December. So there was no opportunity for those two to be pitched against each other. However, if Ruiz defeats Joshua again I can guarantee you that will see Wilder vs Ruiz next.

So Guy with biggest mouth gets a pass ??? I will question his resume when he becomes a world champ with 3 defences at least.

Why do Fury fans think he has such a great resume ???? He doesn`t. But Fury is not a world champ. he WAS world champ, but made zero defences. Wilder has been world champ 4 and half years and his best win is...ortiz. Guy who`s best win is Jennings.

Wilder never fought a world class guy in prime, except Fury. Just saying.

I wouldn't call it a DUCK as Wilder had his path for the next 2 fights (if not 3 with AJ) set out. So there is no real reason, unless if Ruiz was to constantly call out and chase Wilder, but Ruiz ain't doing that either as he has his path already set out for the next 1 fight. So definitely not a duck.

Wilder`s resume is full of euro level guys (Duhaupas, Szpilka), old washed up guys ( Stiverne 2x, Ortiz 2x). He fought Fury only because he thought Fury was done. Fury looked bad against Pianeta and Seferi and Wilder thought it was just an easy target to get a well known name on resume. Now he fights Ortiz again instead of Kownacki for example.

Did anyone know who Ruiz was prior to the AJ fight ???? I did. I thought he best Joseph Parker.