I'm not even going to mention his many very good wins, but just go straight onto the great ones.
Diego Corrales. Prime KO
Jose Luis Castillo (1) Prime 114-112
Jose Luis Castillo (2) Prime 116-112
Oscar De La Hoya. Prime 116-112
Ricky Hatton. Prime KO
Juan Manuel Marquez. Prime 120-107
Shane Mosley. Slightly past prime 119-109
Saul Alvarez. Prime 119-109
Marcos Maidana (1) Prime 115-113
Marcos Maidana (2) Prime 117-111
Manny Pacquiao. Prime. Floyd was slightly past his prime. 118-110
That's 11 outstanding wins.
Moonsri 53-0 TBE. Froyd Gayweather is a protected bum :dance:
floyd's fans do not recognize that fighter's record...surely that's right if he is still active..floyd got 50 - 0 when he retired....
i don't subscribe to X - 0 record as a measure of greatness...simply because of the issue of "is X enough?" Is 50 enough? So many fighters have won so much more than 50 before their first L...
that in a way leads to another question....if floyd retired after doing 20 or more fights, would he still X - 0?
he lost to Castillo in the first fight...cheated marquez in the scales.....many people felt he lost to maidana in the first fight...the odlh fight could have been a draw
floyd is nevada's baby and cash cow...no results other than a win is acceptable..castillo 1 is a magnificent evidence...
Floyd's best wins was Cotto and Marquez.
Manny's leftovers.
Everyone knows that Marquez beat Pac times. What happened with Mayweather and Marquez, again?
Everyone's entitled to their opinion but Oscar and Shane were well past their primes.
Hatton wasn't even an average WW.(1-2)
JMM was first time at 147 and looked it.
The Pac fight happened 5 years after it would have meant something.
"Prime" Madonna got schooled by a washed up Morales and shutout by Devon Alexander.
I'm not even going to mention his many very good wins, but just go straight onto the great ones.
Diego Corrales. Prime KO
Jose Luis Castillo (1) Prime 114-112
Jose Luis Castillo (2) Prime 116-112
Oscar De La Hoya. Prime 116-112
Ricky Hatton. Prime KO
Juan Manuel Marquez. Prime 120-107
Shane Mosley. Slightly past prime 119-109
Saul Alvarez. Prime 119-109
Marcos Maidana (1) Prime 115-113
Marcos Maidana (2) Prime 117-111
Manny Pacquiao. Prime. Floyd was slightly past his prime. 118-110
That's 11 outstanding wins.
As long as the E in TBE means ERA and not EVER I agree. Although to be fair you have to include Pac as slightly past his best also along with Floyd, but speed and reflexes are the 1st to go and power the last so imo Floyd beats him easier if they had fought in 2010 when Pac refused PED test and even Roach says 1st fight did not happen because of them.(its on youtube for anyone to see).
You talk in cliches. You might as well say horns win over pac is better than any Pac win, or jmm win over pac is better than any Pac win. But it don't work like that
Pac has a greater more in depth resume
Except he doesn’t. Resume is nowhere near as good as Floyd’s and he lost 7 times had several draws and was knocked out by two farmers. Nowhere near as good as Floyd’s resume. You Pacquio fans never mention the losses. If you actually look at his resume you could argue Erik Morales was his best win lmao
Yes, the guy that was 28-29 years old, universally recognized as a top 50 ATG, coming off the wins from the likes of Hamed, Morales, Kelly, Tapia, at 126 is still considered "Prime."
Barrera at featherweight has best resume than Floyd.
He beat undefeated 35-0 Prince Naseem Hamed
And he also beat undefeated 41-0 Erik 'El Terrible' Morales
You talk in cliches. You might as well say horns win over pac is better than any Pac win, or jmm win over pac is better than any Pac win. But it don't work like that
Pac has a greater more in depth resume
Nice win by Manny, but floyd has just as many world champs on his resume including Manny himself....funny how ya'll try to ignore that
Thurman had 1 hard fought win in 2 years...you think thurman is better then Canelo or Manny himself? You are really reaching man
You talk in cliches. You might as well say horns win over pac is better than any Pac win, or jmm win over pac is better than any Pac win. But it don't work like that
Pac has a greater more in depth resume
Pac s win over thurman is better. Pacs older and far past prime than floyd was. Thurman is in prime where nelo wasn't and a cw.
Floyd is like calaghe. Calzaghe beat bh, but BH is greater. Floyd beat pac, but Pac is greater. BH had 8 losses, but is still greater than the welshman. Pac has losses but is greater than floyd.
More risks plus more in depth resume. Pac s 8 wins over jmm, barrera, morales and Bradley alone deals with the entire business end of flouds career
Thurman had 1 hard fought win in 2 years...you think thurman is better then Canelo or Manny himself? You are really reaching man
Floyd lost to Castillo
except he didnt..Manny lost to
Floyd
Horn
Jmm
2 uber drivers
Bradley...
Morales
see i didnt have to make up anything just posted facts
floyd wasnt prime either when he beat Canelo..why do people keep ignoring that and the fact Canelo was already a unified and Ring champ and Floyd was 36?
Pac s win over thurman is better. Pacs older and far past prime than floyd was. Thurman is in prime where nelo wasn't and a cw.
Floyd is like calaghe. Calzaghe beat bh, but BH is greater. Floyd beat pac, but Pac is greater. BH had 8 losses, but is still greater than the welshman. Pac has losses but is greater than floyd.
More risks plus more in depth resume. Pac s 8 wins over jmm, barrera, morales and Bradley alone deals with the entire business end of flouds career