Canelo
Manny
Spence
Inoue
Estrada
Crawford
Benavidez
Ruiz
Wilder
Robeisy Ramirez in about 2 years
Do you never get tired of being the dumbest, most stupid always wrong poster here? You are wrong at least 98% of the time.
I mean you’re a racist POS that deserves to die but you’re so stupid it’s not even funny.
I am an African American, based on the way you just described yourself, I am having trouble believing you are what you say you are
Lol not tryna get off topic but I don't like the word African American idk what country my Ancestor were from I only know my American roots hence I'm Black American.
I'm black American lol but I think Warrington is the only feather beating top guys in a row plus he has loads of potential.
I am an African American, based on the way you just described yourself, I am having trouble believing you are what you say you are
Warrington????? GTFOH
You must be from the UK
I'm black American lol but I think Warrington is the only feather beating top guys in a row plus he has loads of potential.
Lol! I was kidding man, but I get your point.
In my mind, boxing is universal, gender does not matter, Shields is the best fighter on the women side of the draw right now, that merits at the very least a spot in the top 10.
For example, do we disqualify fighters from the list based on weight? color? nationality?
No, we don't, so why should gender be different?
Like I said, because women fight different opposition. There are way more men in boxing so the competition is alot tougher.
Less women are boxing so there is less great competition. It's as easy as that. It's basically a different branch of the sport.
People from different nationalities, races etc. have to face the same opposition in a deep pool full of talent. The women's pool is shallower because there aren't as much in it. That's why we seperate them in boxing.
She would obviously beat me up since I am not a professional boxer.
That wouldn't be much of an accomplishment though would it?
Still doesn't warrant her being on this list man since she is not even fighting the same opposition
Lol! I was kidding man, but I get your point.
In my mind, boxing is universal, gender does not matter, Shields is the best fighter on the women side of the draw right now, that merits at the very least a spot in the top 10.
For example, do we disqualify fighters from the list based on weight? color? nationality?
No, we don't, so why should gender be different?
Too overrated for me his best win was against an old undersized Rigondeaux.
There’s quotes from you on this forum saying Rigo would dominate and size didn’t matter then there’s a whole thread you started where you said Linares is a great fighter and Loma would duck him because he’d get destroyed by the much bigger and better Linares.
You’re garbage.
and what would she do to you?
She would obviously beat me up since I am not a professional boxer.
That wouldn't be much of an accomplishment though would it?
Still doesn't warrant her being on this list man since she is not even fighting the same opposition
Clarissa shields ladies and gentleman
apparently is she was the same weight as any man out of the top ten she would beat them up
Wow people are really threatened by women out here
Clarissa shields ladies and gentleman
apparently is she was the same weight as any man out of the top ten she would beat them up
I think what's most interesting about this thread, is the raw sexism, you can pinpoint misogynists pretty easily within the debate.