If GGG is such an overrated bum, then what does that make Canelo?

Half of them were Latino or former opponents of Canelo, nice try. So you went from Mexicans and blacks don't count because somehow you think they all hate GGG. Now Puerto Ricans who historically HATE Mexicans like Poison don't count? When have you ever heard PR's say anything nice or root for the Mexican fighter? And Central Americans who don't give 2 shyts about Mexicans or Puerto Ricans yet they don't count either? You sound stupid now trying lump all these Latino countries together and not knowing the historical divides and hatred they have for each other. So how about just white people? I can give you a list of just whites you racist piece of shyt and you will still find a way to say these fighters and trainers were just bias and somehow hate GGG. Hell fellow russian speaking Lomachenko who is friends with GGG even said he lost. Freddie Roach who is a huge fan of GGG and Able Sanchez said he lost. What about the UK Amir Khan who hates Canelo for knocking the soul out his body has no reason to say Canelo won but he kept it real. And if being a past opponent means you say that guy won then why did Murray and Lemieux past GGG opponents say GGG lost? And a ton of the top UK fighters and trainers said GGG lost as well. I removed the 5 Latino (Non Mexicans) from the earlier list lol Lomachenko Amir Khan Andy Lee Martin Murray Tony Bellew David Lemieux Peter Smith Liam Smith Jason Quigley Anthony Fowler Andy Lee Adam Booth Josh Kelly Gavin Rees Michael Conlan Freddie Roach FACT the vast majority of professional fighters and trainers no matter what nationality had Canelo beating GGG not the other way around. Sorry if that hurts your v@gina

You mean like lomachenko? Or Miguel Cotto Amir Khan Andy Lee Martin Murray Tony Bellew David Lemieux Peter Smith Liam Smith Danny Garcia Jason Quigley Anthony Fowler Andy Lee Gabe Rosado Rolando Romero Adam Booth Josh Kelly Gavin Rees Michael Conlan Roberto Duran Freddie Roach Just a handful of the hundreds of fighters and trainers on record saying they had Canelo beating GGG and none on that list are black or Mexican...but keep trying bro. LMAO Half of them were Latino or former opponents of Canelo, nice try.

Canelo is a PED cheater bum. Hear hear :boxing:

I don't give a flying fck what you think clown. I am not here to impress you with my grammar. I'm merely here to expose you for the imbecilic, racist, fanboi cuck that you are. Instead, you exposed yourself as a bull*****ter. https://media.giphy.com/media/NJZMSqRY3rG9i/giphy.gif

Fighters who had Canelo winning were either Mexican or black fighters who didn’t want to see GGG break Hopkins record. You mean like lomachenko? Or Miguel Cotto Amir Khan Andy Lee Martin Murray Tony Bellew David Lemieux Peter Smith Liam Smith Danny Garcia Jason Quigley Anthony Fowler Andy Lee Gabe Rosado Rolando Romero Adam Booth Josh Kelly Gavin Rees Michael Conlan Roberto Duran Freddie Roach Just a handful of the hundreds of fighters and trainers on record saying they had Canelo beating GGG and none on that list are black or Mexican...but keep trying bro. LMAO

Canelo is a PED cheater bum.

If you are bashing GGG, you are essentially bashing Canelo, because his best win to date is GGG, and that one is disputed by many boxing analysts, boxers and fans alike. Boxing analysts hahahaha They are fat guys with an agenda and biased as hell Fans? most of them are hater of Canelo And professional fighters most of them said Canelo won

You Borat fans have already made this thread 1,000 times. Trashing Borat’s resume, which is literally filled with bums does not equate to saying “Borat is a bum!” Borat is a bum beater, not a bum. Canelo is the bum beater’s father.He beat Canelo twice and Canelo refuses to fight him anywhere except Vegas. Little baby needs his Vegas security blanket.

Are people still using the bull**** lie of team GGG "hand-picked" the judges? How ****ing stupid do you have to be...

Don't expect logic from these anti GGG bastards.

Fighting a bigger opponent is more challenging. Are you saying fighters shouldn't challenge themselves? Why even fight for a title? Why not just fight losing records? Again I ask, go to boxrecs p4p and pick out the fighters who stayed in one division. Now I'd that division was on fire I could understand that, unfortunately for Borat fighting Vanes and Kell Brook does not mean much.You are so damn stupid on boxing that you don't understand how hard it is to stay at your correct weight and be a unified champion who fights all challengers who dare fight you for 20 fights. GGG fou8ght the best guys willing to fighter him and ducked nobody. He tried to fight Saunders, Eubank, Cotto and Martinez but they all refused. If it's so damn easy to rack up 20 title defenses how come nobody fighting today even comes close to 20 successful title defenses? It's a lot harder to do that thyan to move up a few pounds and cherry pick a weak champion like Fielding. Canelo has one successful title defense. Just 19 more to go to tie GGG. Think he will do it. You know damn well he will never even come close. Watch pro wrestling. That's the sport for you.

I call absolute B.S to everything you've said, nobody who has studied at a high level that you suggest you have would have as awful grammar as you do. LARP harder you loser, imagine being this much of a try hard that you pretend to be something you're not, truly pathetic. You're* I don't give a flying fck what you think clown. I am not here to impress you with my grammar. I'm merely here to expose you for the imbecilic, racist, fanboi cuck that you are.

Sorry. meant to say Canelo defended his middleweight title against loser Khan.

You realize he tied it fighting Vanes... are you not understanding that who you fight matters.. you can't just pull accomplishments out of your ass and expect them to mean something.Vanes was a cherrypick because Canelo was next in 3 months. He had 19 other title defenses many of them against good top contenders such as Murray, Jacobs and Lemieux. All the champions have an easy title defense now and then. Khan defended his middleweight title against loser Khan. Every guy GGG ever defended his title against including Vanes would KO Khan. What about Canelo fighting guys like Kirkland and Angulo who had both been KOed by average fighters.Nobody GGG fought was as bad as them.

But canelo.going up in weight to fight an over rated bum is better then an overrated bum who sat on a division his whole career.Canelo did not go up in weight. He weighs exactly the same as GGG on fight night. 170 pounds and he is all muscle and no fat at that weight. GGG is rated the 7th best pound for pound boxer in the world by Ring, ESPN,and boxing Scene and the 3rd best by Boxrec at 37 years old and you call him an overrated bum. Hell, if he is a bum then everyone in the ring today is a bum too. You are an overrated bum of a poster to call a pound for pound top fighter a bum.

Calls me brainwashed then claims chapos responsible for millions of deaths.:dunce: Clenbuterol isn't a masking agent you braindead twat. Theres been countless athletes popped for clen when competing in mexico,& had zero to gain from it. Masking agents are entirely seperate & serve zero purpose under vada you dumbass,not to mention it wouldn't be in the exact amounts consistent with meat exposure.:dunce: Only someone who knows zero about wtf they're talking about would say clen is a masking agent while referring to a vada tested fighter. Masking agents would still count as dirty you dumbass they are substances such as those ortiz was popped for vs wilder. Its also beyond stupid to say clen was used as a masking agent by canelo out of competition & that he would undergo hair follicle testing after nsac demanded it,if he were dirty much less on roids. Your an inbred mulepony,a retárted one at that. Trump,Obama along with several other presidents have murdered countless thousands of civilians in unjustifiable unconstitutional invasions referred to as wars. Pick up a book you fcking imbecilic cuckboi. I am a national registry career Medical professional(I have several certifications that are each national registry in their own right,& have administered countless drug tests to countless individuals. I have gone to college to study medical aspects of drugs & alcohol.) I call absolute B.S to everything you've said, nobody who has studied at a high level that you suggest you have would have as awful grammar as you do. LARP harder you loser, imagine being this much of a try hard that you pretend to be something you're not, truly pathetic. You're*

It's a two way street. You mention on how "most" fighters had G winning yet it could not be further from the truth when bigdunny1 Robbie Barrett had lists of fighters who gave the win to Nelo. Many of the boxing analysts as in 'journalists' "pundits" are hacks with a biased agenda. It's obvious why Dan Rafael, Steve Kim would give their -brutha- the win. Only the judges' decision matter after it's all said and done & the ironic thing is that Gee hand picked those same judges. Fighters who had Canelo winning were either Mexican or black fighters who didn’t want to see GGG break Hopkins record.

I see a lot of GGG bashing threads and posts going. Everything from he's overrated, a bum who only fights bums, he's trash, he's washed up, etc. Well, if you feel that way, then what does that say about Canelo? He fought an "overrated bum" to a draw and barely squeaked out a win in the rematch. If you are bashing GGG, you are essentially bashing Canelo, because his best win to date is GGG, and that one is disputed by many boxing analysts, boxers and fans alike. How are you going to call a guy an overrated bum and then give Canelo full credit for beating him if you truly believe he is a bum, and how were the fights so close? Canelo lost both fights.

I see a lot of GGG bashing threads and posts going. Everything from he's overrated, a bum who only fights bums, he's trash, he's washed up, etc. Well, if you feel that way, then what does that say about Canelo? He fought an "overrated bum" to a draw and barely squeaked out a win in the rematch. If you are bashing GGG, you are essentially bashing Canelo, because his best win to date is GGG, and that one is disputed by many boxing analysts, boxers and fans alike. How are you going to call a guy an overrated bum and then give Canelo full credit for beating him if you truly believe he is a bum, and how were the fights so close? Logic is to most Canelo fans as Kryptonite is to Superman. It is pointless to attempt to "debate" them on the merits precisely because the merits do not justify their affection for Canelo or loathing of Golovkin; clan/identity politics do.

Two close fights yet you think Canelo made him look like trash. The hate and bias has blinded some of you to reality. It's a two way street. You mention on how "most" fighters had G winning yet it could not be further from the truth when bigdunny1 Robbie Barrett had lists of fighters who gave the win to Nelo. Many of the boxing analysts as in 'journalists' "pundits" are hacks with a biased agenda. It's obvious why Dan Rafael, Steve Kim would give their -brutha- the win. Only the judges' decision matter after it's all said and done & the ironic thing is that Gee hand picked those same judges.