Funny how people said this about PBC.
The group that co-funded Dazn is pulling their investment.
Dentsu Aegis is pulling their funding after reports show even with new subscriber rates Dazn has yet to capture even 1% of the US sports viewing audience.
Word is Dazn is now going to be sold to a tech company.
What a complete bust!
From Midia Reserch below:
“Diversification or overextension?
According to SportsPro, DAZN has four million paying subscribers, but investments in growing out its international rights portfolio has seen outgoings double to $336.6 million. While DAZN has successfully acquired rights from the largest and most valuable rightsholders globally, enticing four million subscribers into its ecosystem does not justify the outlay, with DAZN Group’s total rights commitments as of April 2019 at $6.1 billion beyond five years. Hypothetically, even if DAZN retains all four million over the next five years at the new US annual subscription price of $99.99, subscription revenue would only generate $1.5 billion – allowing for a 25% churn rate in subscriptions with no further growth in subscriptions factored in. A $4.6 billion deficit doesn’t even factor in the cost of acquiring new premium domestic rights which DAZN must employ to improve its acquisition funnel, highlighting the uphill battle DAZN faces.
The pendulum is swinging against DAZN
The magnitude of these undertakings could ultimately force DAZN into making a distressed sale or becoming an acquisition target for a tech major or a company with the appetite and financial resources to acquire DAZN’s assets and endure the losses while it builds (bundles) out a truly viable content proposition for sports fans.”
Yes the article exists. People linked it.
Remember who broke PBC to fox boy.
You clearly made this bit up as there is no article talking about Dentsu Aegis pulling their investment.
The group that co-funded Dazn is pulling their investment.
Dentsu Aegis is pulling their funding after reports show even with new subscriber rates Dazn has yet to capture even 1% of the US sports viewing audience.
Word is Dazn is now going to be sold to a tech company.
What a complete bust!
I'm sure this has been you :wank: :wank: :wank: for the past 24 hours as your fabrication has spread over the internet. Congrats.
Yes the article exists. People linked it.
Remember who broke PBC to fox boy.
I'm pretty sure you worked for DAZN and were fired lmao.
Otherwise, I cant understand why you put so much energy into fighting DAZN by fabricating numbers, exaggerating articles and just flat out lying.
MIDiA Research’s Q1 consumer survey highlights this niche proposition struggling to appeal to fans, with only 1.0% of US consumers engaging with DAZN weekly (WAU).
This isn't sustainable. DAZN basically going after the market HBO gave up on in the US. ESPN is taking a chunk out of that with traditional tv outlets and not just an app (even though they have that too). Eventually investors will be tired of losing money. The idea that any group, no matter how large is going to be able to muscle Disney out of their home market is laughable as well. Especially when they are being stupid about it.
Lol at this thread. I love a good debate but why these salty haters got to start a thread with a doctored article? Desperate times ahead for the haterz
I always read it as da zun
Stupid bloody name either way
Terrible name. I’ve been calling it “Days Inn” since I first saw it. I’ve been subscribed to the damn thing for eight months now and I still call it Days Inn just out of habit now.
You don’t want your streaming service sharing a name with a ****ty motel chain lol
Obviously the opening poster has redacted the bits of the article that he didn't like. Zero credibility for any post he makes moving forward.
I don't know if DAZN will succeed. But if you are looking at their performance and not putting 90% of the conversation around growth then you are completely missing the boat. They're a startup. They're focused on growth.
Growth, growth, growth.
Growth.
agree about the name, but a failing business model wouldn't have been saved by it IMO. they got super ambitious and capitalized on the exodus of premium cable from boxing by picking up assets. canelo, golovkin, joshua, etc. but i don't know if it will be profitable
there are a bunch of issues with the dazn service too on my end and with other people. i tried to watch a replay the other day and it was so choppy it was unwatchable. went over to netflix and it was fine. i have a hardlined internet and it's very fast, 100% the issue was on the dazn side.
funnily, when i read it i still call it "dah-zin." i subliminally refuse to call it da zone :lol1:. it's just a dumb name.
Nono bro. The Z is silent. Around these parts we just call it Dan.
I fail to see why I should give a crap. DAZN is awesome for me and I’ll watch it until it goes bust. Good luck to them.
People rooting for networks/A-sides/one-race of fighters need to get a life. I just like seeing good boxing. Anyone obsessing over networks, managers, promoters rather than the fights and fighters isn’t a boxing fan.
I have a very reliable source that The Japanese investment group is pulling out.
Dazn dropped there debt leading into 2018 and then overspent.
Now they are facing a 4.6 Billion Dollar deficit.
They did the $99 deal at time of Canelo fight as a quick cash grab. Only issue is they now have no residual revenue coming in for 12 months. Going for $240 per month to $99 a year was very desperate.
The founder has been selling off assets right and left to fund Dazn.
The business model has been a complete bust in the business world. They are spending so much on servers, and they cannot adequately stream to all internet watchers. Hence the lagging issue.
The $99 dollar deal sealed their fate.
I think a lot of investors bail at the beginning of most new journeys..those who stick it out either lose a lot or gain a lot...to many broke people worried about rich people's issues on here
If true that the thread starter is lying, that is absolutely disguisting, pathetic, n disrespectful to boxing. Personally, I love DAZN n have no issues/complaints SO FAR.
LOL so you cherrypicked a few paragraphs and then made up a story about an investor pulling funding. Obviously you have no agenda ;)
You did almost the same thing. You posted an article then blatantly lied about what was stated and then exaggerated about the total number of subscribers.
If he should be banned permanently for lying and having an agenda, so should you!
He is playing the same game you and frankie0jobs is.
agree about the name, but a failing business model wouldn't have been saved by it IMO. they got super ambitious and capitalized on the exodus of premium cable from boxing by picking up assets. canelo, golovkin, joshua, etc. but i don't know if it will be profitable
there are a bunch of issues with the dazn service too on my end and with other people. i tried to watch a replay the other day and it was so choppy it was unwatchable. went over to netflix and it was fine. i have a hardlined internet and it's very fast, 100% the issue was on the dazn side.
funnily, when i read it i still call it "dah-zin." i subliminally refuse to call it da zone :lol1:. it's just a dumb name.
I actually don't think the business model is flawed I do think the supply chain management is very flawed. I mean I get they saw the opportunity to jump all over some popular content but they massively overpaid for it. I pay about $8 a month for IPTV because we like UK shows too and it's the only way for us to get it. The uk stuff that's popular here isn't from premium channels, it's literally over the air. I think there are at least ten million potential subscribers for that alone in the U.S. and that's a conservative estimate. Take a billion of that and commit it to rebroadcast those channels. Even if they hit 25% of that target audience they come within striking distance of hitting the break-even number while gaining valuation and pulling in more investment cash because the burn rate is way low and the growth makes it sustainable.
I think the estimation of what paid for sports broadcasting is worth is super inflated, there are other ways of making this work prior to that level of commitment.