Fielding vs Rolls -who wins??

Javez Jr. beats them both

who do you know he can even take a punch from anyone at 168 ?? at 35 yo still a prospect lol, with not a single decent fight in his resume... but eith, i respect your opinion, just asking for your criteria here .. He already fought above 160 as a SM and he's undefeated. Not sure if he was at a catch weight or the full weight or how good his opponents were. Someone on another thread said he saw him fight live several times and he has skills so he might last a few rounds.

good !! did you vote already ? huge gap... Yeah just now. I saw the huge gap that you wanted me to see. Happy now???

lol exactly...how is anyone supposed to evaluate how good he is when nobody has heard of him or seen him fight. if I was gonna watch this joke of a fight, I'd hope he would put up a better fight than fielding...that was shameful. Watching it I got the impression froze in the ring. He's bigger and stronger he should have at least tried to rough him up.

They both suck, have no idea who wins, but I'd guess Fielding? Bot of them make no sense as opponents for Canelo or Golovkin. Canelo should have taken more time off to recover, while Golovkin is wasting his career fighting Rolls.

We know Fieldng can't take a punch from a top fighter. He was KOed twice by body shots early in those fights. I'd have to say at this point Rolls is a better fighter until proven otherwise. Canelo and company cherry picked Fielding because he was previously KOed by a body shot early. Canelo throws to the body very well. It was a no brainer for them to cherry pick Fielding and get an easy win. good !! did you vote already ? huge gap...

who do you know he can even take a punch from anyone at 168 ?? at 35 yo still a prospect lol, with not a single decent fight in his resume... but eith, i respect your opinion, just asking for your criteria here .. We know Fieldng can't take a punch from a top fighter. He was KOed twice by body shots early in those fights. I'd have to say at this point Rolls is a better fighter until proven otherwise. Canelo and company cherry picked Fielding because he was previously KOed by a body shot early. Canelo throws to the body very well. It was a no brainer for them to cherry pick Fielding and get an easy win.

boxing history says it happens a lot more the other way... not saying its impossible, but you have to agree that rolls will be clearly the underdog here, by a lot... Yeah, its a disgraceful mismatch no doubt about it. Ive never seen Rolls, but ive seen alot of Rocky and cant think of a single top middle or supermiddle he could beat. I think hes domestic level who won a title from a guy who'd never beat a good fighter. I got guys here describing a world class fighter, hes miles away from that. Rolls Golovkin might be worse, but Fielding had literally no chance in with Canelo, and i cant argue degrees of zero chance 😂

Liam Smith would fucc up Rolls.

So do rated bigger fighters always beat underdogs with no big wins on there record? Do nobody's not beat higher rated guys? Boxing history says it happens plenty.boxing history says it happens a lot more the other way... not saying its impossible, but you have to agree that rolls will be clearly the underdog here, by a lot...

Fielding wins ofc. Rolls is a rod salka level

better question..who the **** is Steve Rolls? lol exactly...how is anyone supposed to evaluate how good he is when nobody has heard of him or seen him fight. if I was gonna watch this joke of a fight, I'd hope he would put up a better fight than fielding...that was shameful.

it seems like a logic choice here, but i have seen some posters claiming the opposite... So do rated bigger fighters always beat underdogs with no big wins on there record? Do nobody's not beat higher rated guys? Boxing history says it happens plenty.

I'll give you an answer. I've never even seen Rolls, and think its a disgraceful mismatch. I also know Fielding isnt world class because i have eyes that work, and had he not been a good ticket seller he could well be 35 years old and unknown. Zeuge had beaten no one, and if you think Ryder is world class, you might be legally blind, just watch the Blackwell fight. So while Rocky has better accomplishments it doesn't change he was an easy mismatch for Canelo, and he couldn't win. Same as this fight. Who knows what Rolls couldve done if he was a friendly scouser with a good promoter? Who cares. Canelo fought a no hoper, just like Golovkin. They both fought Welters. One fought Ishida and one fought Kirkland. One fought Jacobs and now the other is. Both talk about lightheavyweight when we know it wont happen. Neither fought Charlo or Saunders and neither ever will. And both are getting rich doing it, while most of you cant afford a blow up doll to entertain you..��

Come on GGG fan girls explain to us all how Rolls is a better fighter then Fielding???? despite the fact that you have never seen him fight and never heard of him prior to GGG pulling his name out of the trash bin. you aint getting an answer from them, but the poll speaks for it self...

Come on GGG fan girls explain to us all how Rolls is a better fighter then Fielding???? despite the fact that you have never seen him fight and never heard of him prior to GGG pulling his name out of the trash bin.

Only 1 of these guys has been a world class fighter. And the other is Rolls. Barely ranked top 100 and has never fought a top 80 ranked opponent and he's not some spring chicken. He's been a pro for a phuking decade and is 35 years old yet he is still a prospect level fighter LMAO

Rolls is undefeated so he beats Fielding. he does. until they fight of ourse. on the poll i say rocky outpoints rollo

it seems like a logic choice here, but i have seen some posters claiming the opposite... You can probably find 97k people who will choose rolls.

Rolls is undefeated so he beats Fielding. who do you know he can even take a punch from anyone at 168 ?? at 35 yo still a prospect lol, with not a single decent fight in his resume... but eith, i respect your opinion, just asking for your criteria here ..