Say what you will about the score cards

Great fight, great fighter, but still close rounds against a 36 years old dude. all that body work and still GGG was throwing there with him. The beast here is Golovkin...but yeah, I will love canelo to fight the other people, although I see him milking those belts against poor opposition. Canelo gets more respect from me for backing up a bigger and stronger opponent. And he deserves more respect, he has taken much greater risks then Golovkin during his career.

Canelo overall fought a better fight. Complete ring general, superior defense, landed the best shots and was more effective.

Great fight, great fighter, but still close rounds against a 36 years old dude. all that body work and still GGG was throwing there with him. The beast here is Golovkin...but yeah, I will love canelo to fight the other people, although I see him milking those belts against poor opposition. Bro Golovkin is a beast, no doubt. But don't sit here and act like he just didn't get walked down for nearly 12 rounds for the first time in his career. Idgaf his age. That's not important, Canelo turned pro months before Golovkin did so don't go there. Just give respect.

Personally I thought the fight was a draw, just like j thought the first fight was a draw. I didn't see a true loser in either fight. But it is what it is. With that being said, say what you want about Canelo. But there's a new bully in town for that middleweight division. He came in and took the best Folovkin had for 24 rounds and left relatively unscathed. I don't give a **** how you scored the fight. But it's time to put some respek on dat name haters. And you know it. Next let's do Lemeuiex, Then Saunders, then Jacobs and the Twins. They all can get that work!!! Great fight, great fighter, but still close rounds against a 36 years old dude. all that body work and still GGG was throwing there with him. The beast here is Golovkin...but yeah, I will love canelo to fight the other people, although I see him milking those belts against poor opposition.

Keep Lemieux out of it man.... No we can't just "keep Lemeuiex out of it" because his two of his 3 losses are to one man who was a juggernaut for almost 10 years, and an undefeated champion in Saunders. And he just scored KO of the year for the second year in a row. So NO, he's not being left out.

Nah man Lemieux doesnt deserve another payday BJS-Andrade winner, Jacobs-Derevyanchenko winner, Charlo or Golovkin 3...would all be fine with me Fair enough. Golovkin 3 tho is not as enticing at this point. We know what's going to happen. We will be left unsatisfied. We need to let that one marinate and see if Golovkin has anything left in the tank for a fight maybe this time next year. In the meantime time Canelo should fight someone else, I don't want him to be a pacuiao and only have a resume of 3-4 guys over a 10 year perooid. That's stupid. Pacquiao wasted his career fighting Marquez and Bradley. Although, great fights, he left alot of other spectacles on the table. It's like watching Rambo 1,2,3,4 meanwhile Predator and Terminator are out there mixed with Die Hard. You know what I'm saying?

Keep Lemieux out of it man....

Nah man Lemieux doesnt deserve another payday BJS-Andrade winner, Jacobs-Derevyanchenko winner, Charlo or Golovkin 3...would all be fine with me