Robert Garcia
George Foreman
Thomas Hearns
Erik Morales
Chavez Sr
Shawn Porter
Sergio Mora
Mayweather Sr
All have Golovkn NOT winning. They don't know **** about boxing according to Golovkin fans.
GGG fans watching boxing for a total of 3 years are upset. LOL.
lol what a stupid and nonsensical argument. What if we switch their amatuer experiences......what if we give Canelo a one foot height advantage.....what if GGG has a gun.Another low IQ response. No one would ever say about a matchup if both fighters in their prime "Oh, what if we cut off one guy's leg?". SIMPLE, one fighter is in the middle of their prime and one fighter is not and everyone but a biased fool knows that if both were both in the middle of their prime who would win more convincingly than he already did by the overwhelming majority.
So called "reversing the scenario" is fantastical and imaginary because it is not based in reality. Reverse GGG age and he would be more dominant also if you can add octopus arms on GGG he would also be able to land more and ko Canelo which could make him even more dominant.Octopus? Obviously you are new to Boxing because when people talk about matchups between fighters in their prime, they dont make dumb statements like octopus arms. Everyone know which fighter is closest to their prime and which one is not.
lol what a stupid and nonsensical argument. What if we switch their amatuer experiences......what if we give canelo a one foot height advantage.....what if ggg has a gun.
lmao!!!!!!!
I've seen GGG raise his comp and I've seen him slow down with age. Its a combination of things. I would bet 5K that if someone puts up a poll of who would win with GGG being 27 and Canelo being 35 that an overwhelming number would pick GGG.
lol what a stupid and nonsensical argument. What if we switch their amatuer experiences......what if we give Canelo a one foot height advantage.....what if GGG has a gun.
No, the overwhelming majority of people think GGG won. Past that. We are reversing the scenario to see who people would pick to win with GGG taking the youth side and Canelo being the older fighter. It's very obvious which fighter is closer to their prime, every boxing analyst on the planet knows this. Reverse it and you get a more dominant performance from GGG.
So called "reversing the scenario" is fantastical and imaginary because it is not based in reality. Reverse GGG age and he would be more dominant also if you can add octopus arms on GGG he would also be able to land more and ko Canelo which could make him even more dominant.
Robert Garcia
George Foreman
Thomas Hearns
Erik Morales
Chavez Sr
Shawn Porter
Sergio Mora
Mayweather Sr
All have Golovkn NOT winning. They don't know **** about boxing according to Golovkin fans.
All have Canelo not winning but they know it all according to Canelo fans.
who is to say this is GGG on decline because of age and not he looks bad because he's now fighting guys with a pulse. He didn't start fighting on the national stage till about 5 years ago and was fighting nothing but bums until the the Brook fight and has looked worse against Jacbos and Canelo his first 2 top middleweight competition. If he fights these guys 5 years or at 27 he likely get's exposed and the hype job never exists. These flaws I have seen in his game long before he got these fights and many fans here have been calling them out for years and telling people he's ko'ing bums that hides a lot of shyt in your game.
Every fighter has flaws. If you can manage them and play to your strengths that's what makes a fighter successful.
So now we are using imaginary and fantasy statistics to justify peoples opinions that GGG is better than Canelo.No, the overwhelming majority of people think GGG won. Past that. We are reversing the scenario to see who people would pick to win with GGG taking the youth side and Canelo being the older fighter. It's very obvious which fighter is closer to their prime, every boxing analyst on the planet knows this. Reverse it and you get a more dominant performance from GGG.
They fought to a draw or a decision that could have gone either way. So I'm saying, if their ages were reversed, and Canelo was 35 and GGG was 27, the fight would be a comprehensive beat down of Canelo, especially because his stamina in his prime which is pretty bad would be far worse at 35.
So now we are using imaginary and fantasy statistics to justify peoples opinions that GGG is better than Canelo.
Wow you sir don't know jack ***** about boxing.
Because in reality i don't see any way ggg wins or does better in a rematch.
Ggg is done
Haha well bookmark this and I'll bet all of my points that Canelo loses clear in the the return bout. I like both guys but just call it like I see it. Canelo has had bad stamina throughout his career and as he ages its only getting worse. He also can't hurt GGG and knows it now. He gets walked down again and easier next time.
Golovkin looking like garbage has nothing to do with how he would do? :dunce:
I'm stating what history, you're making up fantasy scenarios to try and give Golovkin extra credit. :pat:
While you're at it create a poll on how Golovkin will look after having the same amount of pro fights as Canelo. Abel Sanchez said Canelo has more wear and tear than Golovkin.
You need to snap back to REALITY, aren't you the guy that thinks he's some kind walking lethal weapon because you got a mickey mouse belt in karate? :lol1:You are NOT stating history. The only history is a 27 year old Canelo could not beat a 35 year old GGG. Thats history! I dont care what Abel said....it has no bearing on this. And as to the Karate, obviously your memory is shot to sht and on top of that has nothing to do with the tangent. But I will put up a poll and that will end this debate.
I see next to no way Canelo wins the rematch beyond delaying more and hoping GGG slows down some. Certainly not by knockout. If his stamina allowed him to fight for the entire round for longer than three rounds he would have won the first fight going away. As it is he will tire again and lay around on the ropes too much. He looked alarmed at not being able to hurt GGG after nailing him CLEAN with some bombs and I think his confidence will be **** going into a rematch. I also think with the public outcry it will be hard for the judges to gift him again.
great point I don't think anyone considers him at his peak at 27 he wasn't even fighting dog shyt competition until 5 years ago. before that this dude was fighting lower then dog shyt would get iced by any top guys the fact that he had some struggles with bums at 29 proves it. Like I said the entire premise is pretty stupid on many levels many consider GGG reaching his peak late 2015 early 2016. But as soon as this guy who nobody called too old started facing top level guys he got old real quick lol starting with Brook fight to now he aged 100 years in 12 months at the same time he finally fought someone with a pulse. Convenient how that happens right. LOLThe point flew way over your head. Nothing you said grasps that fact that I wasnt talking about a 27 year old GGG fighting the best in the world, I said how he would fair against a 35 year old Canelo and I guarantee you an overwhelming number of people would pick GGG to beat a 35 year old Canelo, ESPECIALLY with his stamina issues at 35. You went off on an unrelated tangent and drove right off the cliff totally oblivious to the fact that I wasnt talking about GGG's prime or him against top fighters when he was 27. I was talking about Canelo at THIRTY FIVE YEARS OLD.
We don't know how a 35 year old Canelo will look. We know what a younger Golovkin looked like. He was struggling with a 33 year old Welterweight that had lost 5 of his last 7 fights.That has nothing to do with GGG fighting a 35 year old Canelo, or how GGG would prepare for the top fighter in the division compared to an Ouma. Canelo's stamina would be FAR worse at 35 and that is pure common sense, and we can take this to a poll on the weekend and see how many people agree.
You're comparing a 20 year old fighter with a 29 year old fighter. The current Golovkin is better than when he was 29 or younger. Your argument that a 27 year old Golovkin would be favoured is retarded. YOU FAIL.
great point I don't think anyone considers him at his peak at 27 he wasn't even fighting dog shyt competition until 5 years ago. before that this dude was fighting lower then dog shyt would get iced by any top guys the fact that he had some struggles with bums at 29 proves it. Like I said the entire premise is pretty stupid on many levels many consider GGG reaching his peak late 2015 early 2016. But as soon as this guy who nobody called too old started facing top level guys he got old real quick lol starting with Brook fight to now he aged 100 years in 12 months at the same time he finally fought someone with a pulse. Convenient how that happens right. LOL
You're comparing a 20 year old fighter with a 29 year old fighter. The current Golovkin is better than when he was 29 or younger. Your argument that a 27 year old Golovkin would be favoured is retarded. YOU FAIL.WRONG!! I'm talking about a THIRTY FIVE year old Canelo!! ANYONE knows a 27 year old GGG would be hugely favored over a 35 year old Canelo! Canelo's stamina at 35 would be WORSE than it is now fool!!! Epic fail on your part!
8y ago
Robert Garcia - Agrees with Draw, Canelo KOs GGG in Rematch | BoxingScene Community