Mayweather > Barrera, Marquez, Morales and , #48
PACs got 7 wins against these legends.
Floyd's only got one viua cheating scales. Is it any wonder PAC is considered above Floyd atg wise
1. El Terrible
2. Dinamita
3. Babyfaced Assassin
It's pretty tough, you can make a case for any order. Barrera gets underrated often compared to the other two, he suffered the worst career losses out of three in his prime, but he beat Morales 2-1 and lost a very narrow decision to Marquez.
A thread about 3 of the top mexican fighters in history and the first comment brings up froid lmfao you cant make this up
Yeah, a lot of fa*gots on this site.
#1. Barrera: The Most Badass MoFo at 122 & 126 from 2000-2003. Naz was the man to beat at 126 & Barrera took his soul. Next stop after 2003 was 130 & he held his crown from '04-'07. Not bad at all.
#2. Morales: The Second Most Badass MoFo & The Official King at 122 & 126 from late 90's - 2002 (He officially lost his "0"). Came back stronger to dominate 130.
#3. Marquez: A force to be reckoned with at 126 but no official great win. Became a threat at 130 but not for long. Bloody good at 135. Did sensational in 2012. Probably the only official sensational win on his resume.
green k sent, i also think morales lost the first guty spadas fight. barreras win over prime prince was simply beautiful.
#1. Barrera: The Most Badass MoFo at 122 & 126 from 2000-2003. Naz was the man to beat at 126 & Barrera took his soul. Next stop after 2003 was 130 & he held his crown from '04-'07. Not bad at all.
#2. Morales: The Second Most Badass MoFo & The Official King at 122 & 126 from late 90's - 2002 (He officially lost his "0"). Came back stronger to dominate 130.
#3. Marquez: A force to be reckoned with at 126 but no official great win. Became a threat at 130 but not for long. Bloody good at 135. Did sensational in 2012. Probably the only official sensational win on his resume.
Here's a serious question, how do you put Morales over Barrera, when Barrera arguably beat him 3 times? I want to know your take on this.
they were all close but the 2nd was pretty clearly morales' going 1-2 against barrera isnt so bad. hearns went 0-2 against barkley and so barkley is better?
Here's a serious question, how do you put Morales over Barrera, when Barrera arguably beat him 3 times? I want to know your take on this.
Do you mean who's greater, or who's the best head to head? There's a difference.