Despite llama*****o's (29) weak resume and zero prime Hof, not even potential Hof, he already has a loss on his record.
What makes it worse? - he lost to the only "legit" opponent he faced in OLDando Salido.
Even worse? Salido was way past his prime.
I like the llama guy and enjoy his performance. He's just a good slick type of fighter. Not great.
Great is Floyd Mayweather who at 29 already faced multiple HOF fighters with zero losses.
But llama*****o is a better than average fighter.
I asked you the same question three times and you couldn't answer, just as i expected.
Don't worry, not being able to comprehend a sentence is a serious thing and i wouldn't make fun of it.
Your question is not only illogical but irrelevant.
1. Think to yourself - do you really believe there has never been a seasoned pro who gave new comer a shot?
This is what you are saying. Do you understand why I said your statement/question is a ridiculous excuse? Are you stupid?
2. Llamachickhoe has 400 amateur fights - so your statement is irrelevant.
3. Your statement is only relevant if he actually beat Salido.
Ask yourself this. Has there ever been a fighter in history that has been compared to multiple top 10 ATGs despite getting OUTBOXED AND OUTCLASSED by a fighter of Salido's calibre - and after only 10 professional fights?
Abso-****ing-lutely. Only ones I know of are classic hypejobs.
So you admit Orlando Salido officially beat Lomachenko in a professional bout not long ago?
I don't think anybody has denied it.
Controversial? Yes. 2nd pro fight? Yes. Tons of rules broken? Yes.
But official. Again, why is that defeat official so concrete and proof Lomachenko is a terrible fighter but Jones and Mayweather official Olympics losses still seen as "wins"?
Mayweather was robbed you asshat just like Roy Jones Jr. was robbed in the Olympics :dunce:
Professional record > amateur record :dunce: :rofl:
If Lomachenko was a more skilled boxer then why did he already lose to old, shop worn, face first brawler Orlando Salido? Young doe. Weight disadvantage doe. Lowblows doe. Still an official Loss! :loser:
Aren't Jones and Mayweather's Olympic losses still official losses?
Can't have it both ways.
Listen, i know that reading comprehension is something that sometimes you have it or you don't, but i'm a nice guy and I will make this post easy to read so you can answer my questions.
I asked you for one fighter in boxing history that beat a fighter of the level of Salido in his SECOND pro fight, second boy, if you don't understand i will explain you.
The second fight is the one that comes after the first one, so again, tell me one fighter that faced someone of Salido's level on his second pro fight, just one.
You said Floyd Mayweather Jr., but if I'm right, Mayweather faced Reggie Sanders who was 1-1 and never won a world title like Salido, let alone be a world champion at the moment Floyd beat him.
I will put it again so you don't answer irrelevant things.
TELL ME ONE BOXER THAT FACED A CURRENT WORLD CHAMPION ON HIS SECOND PRO BOUT AND WON.
Sorry for that but it seems like the only way that you and your intellectually similar people can answer.
You claim "its ok to lose" because of "in the history of boxing" ??? - what a loser mentality.
Llamachincko is a good fighter. Not great. Stop making ridiculous excuses.
Stop comparing a fighter who has yet to accomplish anything worth recording to an ATG like FLOYD (a fighter who defines HISTORY).
I don't know.
Maybe the 2008 prospect of the year, olympian and current featherweight world champion Gary Russell Jr.
Maybe the undefeated world champion and ,power puncher, Nicholas Walters.
The former world champion Rocky Martinez.
And you can add Jason Sosa, former world champion who last year scored a win over Javier Fortuna, one of the highest ranked boxers in the division.
And it took those guys 30+ fights to have opposition as good as that on their resume.
Perspective people. Don't write Loma's career off yet because of where he's from and the color of his skin.
Mikey Garcia beats the breaks off of Lomachenko.
It's certainly possible, but I don't think it's an easy fight for either man. They each have great boxing skills, above average counter-punching ability, and ring generalship. Loma has the speed advantage, Mikey will have the power advantage. Neither fighter has faced anyone of the other's caliber.
I don't care if Lomachenko lost to Salido, btw Salido wasn't past his prime, he won his world title a fight before he faced Lomachenko and then got two draws in fights of the year contenders, one against the world champion, former olympian and undefeated at the time, Francisco Vargas.
My point is that it doesn't matter if Lomachenko lost to Salido because in boxing HISTORY no one has ever beat a fighter of the level of Salido on his second pro fight.
Never before in History? Sorry true ATG like FLOYD MAKE HISTORY.
And your point is : Double LLamachincko wasn't ready for ****ing SALIDO even after 400 amateur fights at his physical peak.
Yet people are comparing him to Willie pep.
So if he rematches Salido and loses again, will the excuse be the same?
Lmao.
Noooooo. He wasnnttt reaaddyyyy.
I wonder what kind of thought process certain people go through when they decide to make such a thread? Is that the result of evolution going backwards? The result of getting dropped by your parents as a kid? The result of being sitting in moms basement, having no job, no money and just a very unfulfilled life?
You are a hater or you are trolling or both.
Lomachenko lost to a veteran, experienced and good pro fighter in his SECOND pro fight, tell me one fighter that faced an opponent of the level of Salido in his SECOND pro fight, tell me just one.
You are not the first guy this week that comes saying that Loma is fun to watch to later dismiss his accomplishments, so I'm guessing it's one person trolling.
WHY IS IT WHEN PEOPLE SPEAK THE TRUTH THEY GET ACCUSED OF ALTERNATE ACCOUNTS?
Llamachincko is damn near 30 years old with 400 amateur fight. Stop making excuses for his loss to a WASHED UP OVER THE HILL SALIDO.
I bet you think Canelo was too green vs old man Floyd.
Loser
Beautiful post. Looks like the snowflakes are hyping this bum cause they have nobody else to root for. Lol.
WARd, Cashnelo, Mikey, and Wilder run boxing.
They've resorted to comparing amateur records to Floyd. LOL.
It's a damn shame isn't it. First triple LLL now it's double LL.
Why do you call him by this stupid name Llama when unless you are and idiot you know the short version of his long last name is Loma. Are you trying to be cute or funny or are you just insulting Loma? Why is it important to you to convince everybody he is nothing special? Of course he can't equal Mayweather's accomplishments as a pro yet because Mayweather turned pro at a much younger age. If you go by the time they both turned pro Loma won world titles much quicker than Mayweather in far fewer fights.If Mayweather is a better boxer then why does Mayweather have an amateur record of 84 wins and 8 losses with one bronze medal? Loma has an amateur record of 398 wins and 1 loss with two gold medals. Loma's amateur record is the best in boxing history and puts Mayweather's amateur record to shame. If Mayweather was a more skilled boxer then why did he have such a poor amateur record compared to Loma?
Haha haha.
SALIDO > amateur record of 398 wins.
FACTZ.
Despite llama*****o's (29) weak resume and zero prime Hof, not even potential Hof, he already has a loss on his record.
What makes it worse? - he lost to the only "legit" opponent he faced in OLDando Salido.
Even worse? Salido was way past his prime.
I like the llama guy and enjoy his performance. He's just a good slick type of fighter. Not great.
Great is Floyd Mayweather who at 29 already faced multiple HOF fighters with zero losses.
But llama*****o is a better than average fighter.you crack head shut the fuk up. gayweather jr wasn't doing **** in his third pro fight. lomachenko became champion in his third pro fight.lomachenko also has two olympic gold medals. gayweather jr has zero lol