i would still have the winner behind Pacquiao and thurman.
how would you rank the winner of spence brook not only at 147 but pound for pound??
pacquiao resume is head n shoulders above everybody at 147 and with wins over prime porter and prime garcia Thurman is #2.
agree??
i would still have the winner behind Pacquiao and thurman.
how would you rank the winner of spence brook not only at 147 but pound for pound??
pacquiao resume is head n shoulders above everybody at 147 and with wins over prime porter and prime garcia Thurman is #2.
agree??
The winner of Brook-Spence will fight Keith Thurman, to determine the top dog at 147lbs.
I have it;
Pacquia with 3 wins & 1 lost with current top 10 Welters
Thurman with 2 wins with current top 10 Welters
Brooks wit 1 win with current top 10 welters
The case can be made that Thurman has beaten two & he unified the belts.
If Brooks beat Spence then he would even with Thurman with 2 wins against current top 10 Welters
If Spence beats Brooks he would still be behind Thurman cause that would be his first win against a current top 10 Welter.
There you have my 2cents.
I wouldn't disagree with anyone who thinks this if we're talking about a complete annihilation one way or another.
Yeah if the winner completely destroys or dominates the other guy then you could make an argument. I think Thurman has earned the right to be the number 1 guy seeing as Pacquaio is more part time and clearly on his way out.
How can I rate them before I see the fight? Barring a draw there will be a winner. He may just barely win and look average winning. The winner might score a n impressive KO and look great. I expect Spence to look great and KO Brook. I would then rate Spence as the best welterweight and top 5 pound for pound. If I am wrong and Brook wins then I would probably rate Thurman, Brook and Pacquiao about the same.