He shouldn't be +500. He should be +200 at worst. He has a shot in any title fight with anyone his size.
Guess what, he's also about 2 inches taller than GGG with longer reach and he's younger.
We also know he's faster.
This is a wayyyyy more dangerous fight than Canelo. Who has no physical advantages and punches like rat pissing on cotton in comparison. not even close.
No we were right. Golovkin is an overrated hype job that was lucky to walk away with a decision from a B level fighter. :rofl:
championship fighter with 90% ko ratio is not b-level. that's a-level
Jacobs isn't a perfect fighter but he's solid. And he's earned his shot at GGG. So anyone hating on this fight needs to get a life. Who else is out there fighting the top guys in their division? This fight is what boxing needs. 2017 has been great up to this point and this fight is keeping the momentum going.
Put your money on Jacobs then. Is this complicated? Every fight is up for grabs. Either guy could win.
I'm going with the better boxer who, while he may have obvious faults, doesn't make tons of mistakes.
Give it a rest, you've been trying months to hype Jacobs. Nobody is going to change their minds, he's B level.
Everyone knows where you stand on anything ggg related...but do you honestly think brook had a better chance at beating ggg than jacobs does?
I think the odds are correct. GGG is a huge favorite going in. Danny is a fairly live underdog IMO.
Canelo vs khan had tighter odds. 8-1 is a bit much.
Brook was given better odds than jacobs ffs.
but you say golovkins not beaten anyone either? so whys he such a favourite over jacobs if neither of them havebeat anyone good supposedly?
You're way too dishonest to have a discussion with. You twist too much.
I've always said GGG should be The Ring champ because he beat the real Ring champ Martin Murray (who got robbed by Argentinian officials in the Martinez fight).
GGG has fought more top 10 fighters than Jacobs, Jacobs only fought 1. But you're too dishonest, you've already been exposed as a liar and as someone who flip flops. I don't flip flop, i've said since the beginning that Jacobs has no chance and will get KO'ed and that GGG has proven himself at the top level of MW more than Jacobs has. You've flip flopped at least twice and have been exposed and quoted already.
As a GGG fan, I'm concerned.
I hope Abel and them took this fight seriously. He better not come out like he did against Brook.
He definitely needs a more measured approach. He should focus on taking away the jab early then slowly apply pressure...that's the best ggg imo. This looking for the ko bully sh*t is why he eats so many shots lately...trying to force his way closer to his opponent.
sure we can. don't act like quillin wasn't hyped up as the guy who could be ggg's boogieman. he had the undefeated record and had power. yes later on he was ridiculed for things outside the ring like ducking korobov and asking for crazy money to fight ggg and being delusional. jacobs destroyed quilllin in seconds. if you think jacobs is a bum than you are a fool.
You guys are working OT on changing history these past 2 weeks. I gotta give it up to you all, much better promotion than K2. 1,000 times better promotion.
Quillin was never seen as someone who could be GGG's boogieman. He was actually always accused of ducking him. Soon as he got a belt, the ducking accusations started. When he fought Winky, before getting the WBO belt, people bashed him. People called his win over N'Dam mediocre and said he got outboxed. In the Rosado fight he looked like crap. He drew with Lee.
If you bring up Lara, i'd agree with you. But Quillin??? Never. His two best fights were N'Dam and Lee and he struggled badly vs them. He KD'ed N'dam 6 times and still only won 115-107 in his own backyard.
Jacobs hasn't beaten anyone of note aside from Quillin.
You guys ridiculed Quillin for years, you can't say he's a good fighter now that GGG is fighting the guy who upset him.
Daniel Jacobs has 1 win over a top 10 ranked MW in his whole career.sure we can. don't act like quillin wasn't hyped up as the guy who could be ggg's boogieman. he had the undefeated record and had power. yes later on he was ridiculed for things outside the ring like ducking korobov and asking for crazy money to fight ggg and being delusional. jacobs destroyed quilllin in seconds. if you think jacobs is a bum than you are a fool.
The line makes sense Golovkin is highly considered and has been hyped to the gills. Plus what is the case for actually putting money on Jacobs he is a good offensive boxer but he is chinny and doesn't really have great defense. So essentially to win Jacobs has to beat Golovkin at his game. Getting 5 to 1 is decent though because Jacobs has some length and is probably a bit faster with his hands so maybe he finds a way to make it work, and you never know Jacobs may catch lightning in a bottle and fight way above his head for one night.
Jacobs should probably be like 3.5 to 1 so it is a decent risk to take, but it is still a risk because a lot of things are saying Jacobs shouldn't win.
He shouldn't be +500. He should be +200 at worst. He has a shot in any title fight with anyone his size.
Guess what, he's also about 2 inches taller than GGG with longer reach and he's younger.
We also know he's faster.
This is a wayyyyy more dangerous fight than Canelo. Who has no physical advantages and punches like rat pissing on cotton in comparison. not even close.Jacobs being 2 inches taller has nothing to do with his chances of winning the fight. If height determined the winner then why bother to have a fight? Just measure the boxers and declare the taller man the winner. Hearns should have beat Hagler since he was 6 inches taller.I don't think Jacobs is faster than GGG. I think Canelo would beat Jacobs. Jacobs and Canelo are close in power, speed and skill but Canelo has a much better chin. If Jacobs wins or puts up a good fight then the heavy odds against Jacobs will be proven wrong. If GGG wins a one sided KO then the 8 to 1 odds in his favor will be proven correct. We will soon find out how accurate the pro odds makers were or weren't on this fight.
The odds are probably the way they are because GGG is a known power puncher and Jacobs has a suspect chin. Kind of like if Khan fought Mattysse, he's definitely a better boxer but because of his chin he'd probably be an underdog.
This is a wayyyyy more dangerous fight than Canelo. Who has no physical advantages and punches like rat pissing on cotton in comparison. not even close.
Haha! Good one.