Sh1t Like This Pisses Me Off About Golovkin Fan's

Lara, Charlo, Eubank, Jacobs, that brit guy idk name are out there, Ggg should fight them before he gets ruined by Canelo.

Shutup u bloody queen.

Wow some people here claiming Charlo a better win than the people GGG has beat and knocked out. LOOOL i cant stop laughing I know right These fools forgot about brook and lemieux Golovkin could retire right now with those names

Wow some people here claiming Charlo a better win than the people GGG has beat and knocked out. LOOOL i cant stop laughing

It's ridiculous, isn't it?

Mant hey dont want him to fight anyone worth a damn...

I guarantee you I have a higher level education than you ;) IDGAF about Saunders or any woulda coulda excuses (which seems to always be the case when yall defend GGG). Golovkin is unified MW champion of the world. Made Canelo vacate like a pusy. There's no excuses for Golovkin, the ones making excuses are the other guys.

Why do I mind writing three paragrahps if I'm speaking with a subpar person that could not even finish elementary school. I guarantee you I have a higher level education than you ;) IDGAF about Saunders or any woulda coulda excuses (which seems to always be the case when yall defend GGG).

You midget, you have to understand that criticizing Golovkin won't make you taller. If you wanna see excuses, search for Canelo, Jacobs, BJS... etc. AND YOU MAKING EXCUSES ISNT MAKING HIS RESUME AND LEVEL OF OPPOSITION ANY BETTER :poke:

Oh... you sure about that? The bold below seems to disagree with you. Why do I mind writing three paragrahps if I'm speaking with a subpar person that could not even finish elementary school.

shouldve couldve wouldve..its been since 2013...yall not tired of talking in circles and making excuses....his team isnt into taking risks with their investment You midget, you have to understand that criticizing Golovkin won't make you taller. If you wanna see excuses, search for Canelo, Jacobs, BJS... etc.

Golovkin was about to fight Eubank jr, which pulled out of the fights and Brook was a replacement. Do you need me to explain it again? I hope not. I'm not one of those who say "Lara or Charlo should move up to 160 first, have a good win and then fight Golovkin"... I think they can get the fight as long as they don't ask for big money which they don't generate (unless Haymon puts that money, just like Roc nation put 5 millions for Ward). The problem with these fights not happening is money, it's not about being brave. They could fight Golovkin for 1 million, beat him and became the man at MW, but no, they want 3, 4, 5, who knows how much. Money that they can't generate. You should educate yourself before speaking. Lara's manager just said: "Lara commands a lot of money" come on the guy can't even sell out in Cuba if he fought there. Same with Jacobs.. rejected 2 millions, wtf. shouldve couldve wouldve..its been since 2013...yall not tired of talking in circles and making excuses....his team isnt into taking risks with their investment

Jermall is good but not nearly as good as you say he is. . Bundrage is a 40 something has been who was never that good to begin with. Trout has seen better days but Jermall just barely beat him. Jermall has good fighters to fight at 154 like Andrade who I think would beat him. Why don't Lara and Jermall fight each other? Having the same trainer isn't a good enough reason for two 154 pound champions not to fight each other. The Charlo brothers shouldn't fight each other but Lara isn't related.Between the brothers and Lara they are holding 3 title belts hostage. Jermall will probably beat J Rock but I hope he loses because J Rock would fight the guys Jermall isn't fighting. Lara has been fighting unranked guys while he calls out GGG but I don't read any complaints from you about Lara's very weak opponents since he lost to Canelo.

Golovkin was about to fight Eubank jr, which pulled out of the fights and Brook was a replacement. Do you need me to explain it again? I hope not. I'm not one of those who say "Lara or Charlo should move up to 160 first, have a good win and then fight Golovkin"... I think they can get the fight as long as they don't ask for big money which they don't generate (unless Haymon puts that money, just like Roc nation put 5 millions for Ward). The problem with these fights not happening is money, it's not about being brave. They could fight Golovkin for 1 million, beat him and became the man at MW, but no, they want 3, 4, 5, who knows how much. Money that they can't generate. You should educate yourself before speaking. Lara's manager just said: "Lara commands a lot of money" come on the guy can't even sell out in Cuba if he fought there. Same with Jacobs.. rejected 2 millions, wtf. Oh... you sure about that? The bold below seems to disagree with you. There is a big difference between calling someone out and actually making a serious effort to really fight the guy. Why do guys like Charlo and Lara only call out GGG and never call out Jacobs or Saunders? It seems like more of a publicity move saying look how fearless I am. I am not afraid of GGG. You know GGG is trying to get all the middleweight belts. He got all kinds of sh*t from guys like you for fighting the welterweight champion Brook.If he KOed Charlo you would trash the hell out of him for fighting a smaller guy regardless of what you are saying now. Let's face it, you are a GGG hater even if you say you aren't. You say he has no business being ranked PFP in the top 10. You say he would have no chance to beat Canelo and that fight would be a mismatch. Those aren't the opinions of a reasonable neutral fan. Those are the opinions of a GGG hater. If Lara and Charlo want to fight GGG then why don't they beat a middleweight and get a middleweight ranking and make themselves relevant as a middleweight. Why don't they make a cash offer to fight GGG. As of now GGG has no logical reason to fight them except to please haters like you. After he knocked them out you would only hate him more anyway. This...0000000000

Oh no it's about money? But I thought you quoted the other retard saying "this?" And "this" was him claiming that Charlo and Lara needed to do something at 160 first before fighting Golovkin. Something Brook DID NOT do. But now you wanna talk about money. F*ck up, *****. So which one is it, is it about making yourself relevant at 160 or is it about money? I love seeing you GGG fangays scramble around with double standards. Golovkin was about to fight Eubank jr, which pulled out of the fights and Brook was a replacement. Do you need me to explain it again? I hope not. I'm not one of those who say "Lara or Charlo should move up to 160 first, have a good win and then fight Golovkin"... I think they can get the fight as long as they don't ask for big money which they don't generate (unless Haymon puts that money, just like Roc nation put 5 millions for Ward). The problem with these fights not happening is money, it's not about being brave. They could fight Golovkin for 1 million, beat him and became the man at MW, but no, they want 3, 4, 5, who knows how much. Money that they can't generate. You should educate yourself before speaking. Lara's manager just said: "Lara commands a lot of money" come on the guy can't even sell out in Cuba if he fought there. Same with Jacobs.. rejected 2 millions, wtf.

charlo would be the best win of his career (provided he would win) which isnt saying much. but it doesnt matter, golovkin probably wont fight a real challenger ever. just retire and claim greatness in theory without proving it in practise. charlo shouldnt even bother barking up that tree, 154 is probably the best division in boxing right now. andrade, canelo, lara, williams and the charlo twins. all real fighter who will show up, if he could clean out that divison (with the exception of his brother) that would prove a whole lot more than anything at 160. Golovkin's greatest accomplishments have been his wins in fantasy fights. :lol1:

Shut up you subpar person. Brook was offered 5 million dollars by Hearns. Brook and GGG sold 600k PPV in the UK and sold out a 20k arena in 12 minutes. Wake me up when Lara or Charlo can manage to generate that money. Of course GGG was going to fight Eubank jr but we all know he pulled out of the fight with bull **** demands. https://twitter.com/ChrisEubank/status/795654296666836996 Oh no it's about money? But I thought you quoted the other retard saying "this?" And "this" was him claiming that Charlo and Lara needed to do something at 160 first before fighting Golovkin. Something Brook DID NOT do. But now you wanna talk about money. F*ck up, *****. So which one is it, is it about making yourself relevant at 160 or is it about money? I love seeing you GGG fangays scramble around with double standards.

Mismatch, ain't no challenges south of 168 for the Golden Goose Gennady, if GGG fan boys don't want his opposition shat on he needs take a competitive fight ain't none of them at 160 or further south and everyone on this forum knows it. His fans are the biggest losers on this site and for the most part racist cunts too.

It's really hilarious to see GGG fans (I'm one but not as stupid) use the same reasoning Floyd fans used when it comes to fighting such and such. LITERALLY the same exact arguments. Do some even realize this?

I saw a thread earlier were Jermall Charlo was calling Golovkin out (btw which is a great fight). Most Golovkin fan's claim no one wants to fight him, now they are saying Charlo isn't worthy. Wtf really?? Charlo would be the best fighter on Golovkin's resume, Charlo already has beaten world class fighters in Bundarge and Trout, and this upcoming saturday he's beating another one. Charlo/Golovkin would be great fight I have no problems with a charlo vs ggg fight...but if bundrage is world class, then ggg's resume is full of world class fighters.