Heavyweight champion Tyson Fury has caused outrage once again with the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism calling for the controversial boxer to be barred. Click Here To Read More]
A link to some cooky, fringe, poorly designed website that has no reliable evidence whatsoever is supposed to persuade me? :rofl: "You don't need to provide irrefutable information" yeah you just keep spouting unsubstantiated bollocks then :lol1: .
What banks are controlled by Jews?
Zero proof yet again. And in alluding to "owning it ALL" why no mention of the tremendous wealth and power of the Gulf states, like Saudi Arabia or your beloved Qatar, these families likely own more than the Rothschild's.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2014/dec/09/london-qatar-royal-family-regents-park-200m-palace-harrods
"What they plan to do with it"
Why no mention of what Saudi Arabia is doing with their money and power? Investing billions in exporting Wahhabism? And don't try discrediting my comparison, these countries are run by families who have ridiculous wealth.
It wasn't supposed to be irrefutable proof. As I said, if you don't believe in it, then good luck with your future. Because that's seriously dumb.
Even if they b!tch out and ban him in the UK, he'll have plenty of other options.
Boxing is one of those sports, he'll always get a license to fight somewhere. No amount of PC propaganda will change that.
Totally however his promoter would have a harder time making money there, esp befitting of undisputed HW champ. Unless he gets into purse bids with Povetkins people
Brits run a much tighter ship, right? There actually is a national commission which has handed out bans on fighting in the Uk. He could maybe fight in Germany, but they've got some strong hate speech laws there AFAIK. Several posters in this thread already ran afoul of those. He could always go Russia.
Even if they b!tch out and ban him in the UK, he'll have plenty of other options.
Boxing is one of those sports, he'll always get a license to fight somewhere. No amount of PC propaganda will change that.
This sport is not run by one overseeing, all powerful commissioner.
You can't ban someone from boxing, motherf*ckers.
Brits run a much tighter ship, right? There actually is a national commission which has handed out bans on fighting in the Uk. He could maybe fight in Germany, but they've got some strong hate speech laws there AFAIK. Several posters in this thread already ran afoul of those. He could always go Russia.
What makes you think this is about money only? Also, the 350 bn figure has been debated for a long long time. The family is worth much more than that.
Because they want to own IT ALL. Full control.
It's not a conspiracy that they exist :lol1: or that they have money or power. It's what they plan to do with it that's a conspiracy.
Zero proof yet again. And in alluding to "owning it ALL" why no mention of the tremendous wealth and power of the Gulf states, like Saudi Arabia or your beloved Qatar, these families likely own more than the Rothschild's.
But that sum pales into insignificance besides the value of the Qatari royal family’s other holdings in London. In a spending spree that started in 2008, the ruling Al Thani family and its assorted investment vehicles, including the Qatar Investment Fund, have acquired a 20% slice of Camden market; posh department store Harrods; 95% of the Shard, at 87 storeys the EU’s tallest building; the Olympic village; half of the world’s most expensive apartment block at One Hyde Park; the Chelsea Barracks site, and the US embassy building in Grosvenor Square.
Along the way, Qatar has also acquired just over a quarter of Sainsbury’s, some 8% of the London Stock Exchange, and nearly 7% of Barclays. As the former Qatari prime minister, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani (not to be confused with the current eighth emir, 34-year-old Sherborne, Harrow and Sandhurst-educated Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, whose London home the neoclassical Cornwall Terrace mansion will be) observed to the Financial Times in a rare 2010 interview, “We are investing everywhere. Even your Harrod’s – we took it.”
http://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2014/dec/09/london-qatar-royal-family-regents-park-200m-palace-harrods
"What they plan to do with it"
Why no mention of what Saudi Arabia is doing with their money and power? Investing billions in exporting Wahhabism? And don't try discrediting my comparison, these countries are run by families who have ridiculous wealth.
No I believe that 13 arabs with stanley knives penetrated the U.S's trillion dollsr defense system and the powers that be magically made trillions off the back of that attack - Just by coincidence :thinking:
I don't need to provide irrefutable information. If you don't believe that Rothschilds control the central banks then good luck with the rest of your life :lol1:
http://csglobe.com/complete-list-of-banks-ownedcontrolled-by-the-rothschild-family/
A link to some cooky, fringe, poorly designed website that has no reliable evidence whatsoever is supposed to persuade me? :rofl: "You don't need to provide irrefutable information" yeah you just keep spouting unsubstantiated bollocks then :lol1: .
By something similar you mean something factual?
If he said that all Muslim are terrorists, killers and what not then it would be offensive. If he said that some Muslims are terrostits he'd be right because it's a fact.
Same thing with Jews, it's a well known fact that World's biggest banks and entertainment industry are cotrolled by Jewish people, and yet, some f*ggots feel the need to show off how outraged they are....which would be cool (well,to them,at least) if they had something legit to be outraged about, not f*cking facts.
#BanTysonFury
#BanNewsReportersToo
What banks are controlled by Jews?
Instead of banning Fury they should use this as an opportunity to open up a national conversation on the topic.
Why do so many people feel that Jews own the banks and the media? Is this based on fact or just paranoia? If it is true how might this affect society? What can be done to ease people's concerns and bring both sides together?
Put all cards on the table and have an open, honest discussion.
Quite a knee jerk reaction by the CAA. I would have hoped that an anti racist group would be better schooled than to fall into the trap of individualising the issue. As you point out Fury's opinions haven't been formed in a cultural vacuum.
Stating that "Britain does not tolerate or support racism" completely shuts down any further dialogue on the systemic problem of racism and paints Fury as a complete aberration, which he isn't. Where can they go from there? Suggest that we poke him with our pitchforks? Which is essentially what they've done. That's not entirely out of character for Jonathan Sarcedoti though.
He's gotten his group some much needed media coverage with their I'll thought out indignation I guess. What they're not taking into account (and I don't say this to excuse his comments) is that Fury is from a much maligned racial group who's way of life has been increasingly outlawed and who have the worst educational levels in the country. He's not a member of a debating society. He didn't attend Oxford like Sacerdoti.
Kevin Mitchell writing in the Guardian was on the offensive in a recent article, the undercurrent of which was him pompously mocking Fury's lack of knowledge and education whilst lauding up his own.
No doubt Tyson Fury is many things, including ignorant, as we all are in our own ways, but what do they expect from him? Not everyone has had the privelage of the kind of upbringing that helps inoculate against bigoted views. Sh*t, Sacerdoti has had about as privileged an upbringing and education as one could have and its not helped him. He's regularly defended the bombing of men, women and children on the Gaza strip. The man isn't as anti racist as he makes out. He's a lobbyist.
Ban him from what? Speaking his mind? That's illegal unless he's inciting hatred, and I didn't see him do anything remotely close to that.
Fury needs to keep his mouth shut for a while though. This sort of stuff can have real lasting repercussions on his career if he's not careful.
If he wants to keep speaking his mind then he's at liberty to, but he has to understand that we don't live in a world where we're all at liberty to say what we want without negative consequences.
Remeber that article about the worlds richest people control like 90% of the global wealth and they could all fit on one bus?
If I recall, at least half were Jewish.
- $350 billion isnt that much in the grand scheme of things. That is a small dent in the national debt.
- If they control 99% of the worlds money and countries as the video proposes, why would they care so much about NK and cuba? both are isolated and dont have chit.
-Why does it even have to be a conspiracy theory? money = power, of course someone with $350 billion has a ton of power and influence over leaders. Go look at goldman sachs, they have both Cruz and Hillary in their pocket, it literally doesnt matter to them which one wins, because they bought off both. Same for anyone with money, its common sense and not a conspiracy.
What makes you think this is about money only? Also, the 350 bn figure has been debated for a long long time. The family is worth much more than that.
Because they want to own IT ALL. Full control.
It's not a conspiracy that they exist :lol1: or that they have money or power. It's what they plan to do with it that's a conspiracy.
"Behaviour like this should prompt his sponsors to withdraw their backing. Britain does not tolerate or support racism."
"Jew" ain't a race you knobhead. Errything Tyson be saying be true. The Zionists have always tried keeping us Irishmen down.
You know what I find shocking more than anything is you can't have a opinion on anything these day's. You say anything about gay people and you have some group calling you out. It's bloody ridiculous if your proud of whatever whoever you are then there's no need for a response. Just leave them to it and do your own thing. But no you have to go and try ruin his life. How is that even fair. And seriously who takes anythng he says seriously anyway.
You people are such mongoloids. You even watch your own video? It's claiming 6 mil Jews experienced "hardship" after ww1, not death.
http://static.gamespot.com/uploads/original/1320/13204927/2444945-5903787721-19123.jpg
First of all, it didn't only mention '6 million Jews experiencing hardship', it mentioned specifically "6 million Jews" in specific circumstances (threat of death, famine, starvation, persecution etc etc). The point is, which went completely over your head, was that there was an obsession by Jewish journalists with the number '6 million' dating back to WW1. Why?
And historians who's credibility is at stake have pretty much agreed on these numbers
Their CAREER is at stake, you mean. Not their credibility. If they come out and deny that 6 million Jews were killed, their career will be brought to an abrupt end.
And "pretty much", you say? Not quite sure, are we? lol
despite what some random YouTube douchebag thinks he's stumbled upon.
He's a douche bag because he pointed out Jewish journalists had an obsession with the figure '6 million' dating back to WW1?
Do all you Brits feel that their is a Jewish conspiracy to brainwash you? If so I have a tinfoil hat I'd like to sell you that can stop this, please send me 500 American dollars and I'll ship it right over. Good night geniuses.
To know such a thing, we'd need technology which could read the minds of every single person, in this case British people.
But anyway, yes a Jewish elite controls the Western media. This is not a conspiracy theory - it's a provable fact, but people like you just dismiss the evidence and turn the other way because you can't bear what the truth looks like.