spence is ranked #2 in ibf.. kell talking about retiring if he doesnt get a "big fight" hes gonna happily hand the belt over to spence :rofl:
Kell will move up rather than face Spence
Robert Guerrero, Lamont Peterson, Sadam Ali, Errol Spence.
No more Kevin Bizier type opponents.
:dance:
So pathetic that nobody can imagine Brook in the ring with any of those in the list. It's easier to imagine him with No no Dan types.
spence is ranked #2 in ibf.. kell talking about retiring if he doesnt get a "big fight" hes gonna happily hand the belt over to spence :rofl:
Yeah honestly that's the reason I think Brook should just accept the 80/20 split:
(1) It's still a career-high payday for Brook
(2) If Brook wins, he's the A-side in a potential rematch and he'll make bank on that
(3) The fight needs to happen this Summer. It's a stadium fight so it needs to be outside to maximize revenue. Early Fall is out because Khan is coming off Ramadan. Winter is out because it's too cold. Brook's mandatory will come due in January 2017 so the Khan fight can't be put off past then because what if Brook loses to Spence? Bye-bye IBF title & bye-bye Khan payday.
brook doesn't have to prepare for khan since he would beat him easily. khan has to prepare himself for the loss he's going to take as soon as he steps up and stops fighting gatekeepers.
Neither Brook nor Khan are exactly covering themselves in glory lately.
I'd rather Brook vacates and retires instead of his constant flow of bum level opposition.
As for Khan, I'd like him to stick around so that Danny, Thurman or Porter can put him to sleep...permanently.
Brook is an undefeated world champion while Khan is a three time loser who has not been a champion in 4 years. Khan has yet to fight a hard punching top 10 world rated welterweight and hasn't fought at all in nearly a year. Brook doesn't have to do a damn thing to earn a fight with Khan. It's the other way around. Khan has never fought a welterweight as good as Kevin Bizier. I saw Bizier fight recently and he is a good fighter. He is the number 1 challenger for Brook's title. What is so terrible about Brook defending his title against his top challenger???? By the way I don't see any of the other welterweight champions agreeing to fight the dangerous Spence. Do you? Thurman turned Spence down flat so don't single out Brook for not fighting Spence when the other champs won't fight him either.
Finally someone callin it like it is.
Robert Guerrero, Lamont Peterson, Sadam Ali, Errol Spence.
No more Kevin Bizier type opponents.
:dance:How about your favorite fighter and so called world champion Garcia fighting Errol Spence? It would be a giant step up from fighting over the hill Guerrero. I would bet money Bizier would beat Guerrero and maybe Garcia as well.
Robert Guerrero, Lamont Peterson, Sadam Ali, Errol Spence.
No more Kevin Bizier type opponents.
:dance:Brook is an undefeated world champion while Khan is a three time loser who has not been a champion in 4 years. Khan has yet to fight a hard punching top 10 world rated welterweight and hasn't fought at all in nearly a year. Brook doesn't have to do a damn thing to earn a fight with Khan. It's the other way around. Khan has never fought a welterweight as good as Kevin Bizier. I saw Bizier fight recently and he is a good fighter. He is the number 1 challenger for Brook's title. What is so terrible about Brook defending his title against his top challenger???? By the way I don't see any of the other welterweight champions agreeing to fight the dangerous Spence. Do you? Thurman turned Spence down flat so don't single out Brook for not fighting Spence when the other champs won't fight him either.
Brook would massacre Guerrero.
I would like to see him fight any of the other 3 though, especially Spence. Spence will actually be his mandatory in a few months...