How can the ww division get a clear #1

Awww dont be mad little girl. The race card isn't working for a lot of people these days. Yours is even more overdrafted than your bank card :crackhead :banana: I love how emasculated you are now. :lol1: Afraid to say what's really on your mind, like a true coward. :lol1:

Not as dumb as you, constantly getting banned for racism like a typical low IQ having idiot. :lol1: Awww dont be mad little girl. The race card isn't working for a lot of people these days. Yours is even more overdrafted than your bank card :crackhead :banana:

You couldnt possibly be any more stupid. Not as dumb as you, constantly getting banned for racism like a typical low IQ having idiot. :lol1:

let them all do a tourney, then winner takes on pac. he's still clearly above the rest.

wait three months for the winner of manny and bradley. :anyword: ..

Fighters need to start opening their mouths during interviews. The politics are so bad because no one wants to rock the boat and speak the devils name. (Speak of the devil and he doth appear). You just need someone who doesnt give a **** . That would be all it takes

In a perfect scenario... Manny-Bradley winner vs Porter-Thurman... But with the powers that be unwilling to make that happen, than I'd say Bradley-Manny winner is as close as we get to undisputed champion.

Welterweight could heat up a lot in the next 18 months. Danny, Ali, Crawford, Matthysse, Postol, and the big hope Spence could all be active there in 2017. Could be great if the matches get made.

Pacquiao is still clearly #1. The day he retires or loses to another WW then he wo t be #1 anymore.

If Bradley beats Pac he's the lineal champ in most people's eyes. Bradley vs Brook would copper-fasten the claim. Porter-Thurman winner is the only other factor. If Brook beat Bradley that fight could happen.

Well, a damn tournament would be nice. But since the WBC is a joke they have literally only signed two fights to the tournament they were proposing. You couldnt possibly be any more stupid.

Porter vs Thurman, Khan vs Brook and Manny vs Bradley is a nice start if all those fights come off. If the winners fight each other, it would be hard to deny whoever comes out on top of that as the best in the division. this! i agree

What fights need to be made and how can they be made? Someone just needs to unify the WBA and WBC titles. That would give them the lineage of the IBU, NYSAC, NBA & NSC.

Porter vs Thurman, Khan vs Brook and Manny vs Bradley is a nice start if all those fights come off. If the winners fight each other, it would be hard to deny whoever comes out on top of that as the best in the division. Forget Pac, he's about to retire so we can discount him. Porter/Thurman and Bradley/Brook, then the winners would determine the best fighter in the division. Have Khan and Garcia rematch and the winner is in position to challenge the winner, but right now neither Khan or Garcia are in position to claim the best welterweight title.

What fights need to be made and how can they be made? Can't tell if serious here...ww has a clear #1, he is just inactive and his name is WARcos WARdana. Brook and Bradley have a chance, but everyone after that would be stopped early. I know people will roll their eyes and post pics of Maidana after he put in weight, but until he issues an official statement that he isn't coming back to ww or retiring, he is the kingpin of the division.

What fights need to be made and how can they be made? It took us 7 years to get pac v may,less hope it doesn't take as long now. Pac v Bradley is a clear fight between the number 1 and 2 in the division, I.e. In a few months time well have a clear numero uno but then pac will go into hibernation / semi retirement. Which leaves Bradley has the top guy by default. We then need a legitimate challenger, so we need khan v Brook and porter v Thurman, the winners fight each other and then fight Bradley. If the idiots in boxing get their heads out their arse, we could have this mess sorted end of 2016.

Phase 1 A: Pacquiao vs. Bradley III B: Brook vs. Khan C: Thurman vs. Porter D: Garcia vs. Guerrero Phase 2 E: Winner A vs. Winner B F: Winner C vs. Winner D Phase 3 G: Winner E vs. Winner F This way you only need HBO and PBC to work together on one fight (G), which would undoubtedly be a PPV event anyway. This makes sense on paper. Porter and Thurman shapes up the division nicely. Brook needs to prove his place in the top Four by fighting a live dog. Khan would be the most obvious pick. Danny is moving up but I'd like to see him fight Algieri, I think Guerrero is shot.

Wait three months for the winner of Manny and Bradley.

Thurman/Porter Vs Garcia..The winner jumps up a few spots. If Bradley beats Pacquaio he's the top man, if he loses though..where does he go next. Then there is Khan and Brook. I just don't see these guys fighting each other either way. It's a division that is hit massively by boxing politics. Which is a big shame as there is some potential great fights there to be made.

Until the best 6 or 7 welterweights start fighting each other regularly you will never get a clear number one like Mayweather was. The winner of the Pacquiao vs Bradley fighting the winner of Thurman vs Porter is a fight that will never happen. Arum is not going to do business with Haymon. Even if that fight did happen the winner wouldn't be recognized as the best by everyone. Brook, Garcia and Khan would all have been left out and their fans aren't going for that. My guess is someday Spence will be recognized by many as the best welterweight in the world but that is just a guess with no Spence wins yet to back it up. The way boxing is now we may never get a welterweight number 1 that everyone agrees on.