[POLL] Amir Khan vs Porter

Amir Khan has already admitted that he will continue to duck Kell Brook until the fight makes 100million i.e never. So what's next for Khan? Having gone life and death against a Kickboxer with 8 KO's who wobbled Khan several times and deserved at least a draw from the fight, Amir will have to be a lot more careful in the selection of his next cherry pick. Having pretty much exhausted all the pillow punchers he possibly can from Molina to Collazo to Alexander to Algieri....who is a realistic next opponent for Khan? My suggestion would be Porter. This is about as low risk a fight out there for Khan you would think. Porter doesn't have great amateur experience but he has been slowly cleaning up his division. I don't think it will be a total wash in Khan's favour. What do we think about this match-up?

Comments (20)

b00g13man

What did all those other names against whom Khan was a favorite got to do with a thread titled: Khan vs Porter? Erm.....Can you actually read? A poster said he was supposed to have lost many times before, and the odds for a few of his fights were posted to discredit that claim. Now, what does Floyd have to do with this thread?

10y ago

BoxOffice

What does Floyd have to do with this thread? What did all those other names against whom Khan was a favorite got to do with a thread titled: Khan vs Porter?

10y ago

b00g13man

When was the last time Mayweather was an underdog? What does Floyd have to do with this thread?

10y ago

BoxOffice

Yeah man, so many times. Khan - Algieri (fav: Khan-1600) Khan - Alexander (fav: Khan -240) Khan - Collazo (fav: Khan -600) Khan - Garcia (fav: Khan -600) Khan - Peterson (fav: Khan -1200) Khan - Barrera (fav: Khan -140) Khan - Maidana (fav: Khan -300) Khan - Judah (fav: Khan -600) Khan - Malignaggi (fav: Khan -500) Khan - Prescott (fav:Khan -1600) When was the last time Mayweather was an underdog?

10y ago

SalimShady1212

My bad. I saw the period as a comma instead for some reason, changing the context. Might be time to get some glasses. aha no worries buddy. All fun and games :boxing:

10y ago

b00g13man

Err...I kind of did admit that with the "yes". You asked a question and I answered it with yes at the start of my reply. Chill out. My bad. I saw the period as a comma instead for some reason, changing the context. Might be time to get some glasses.

10y ago

SalimShady1212

Your point was proven wrong by the poster with the betting odds. He's always been the favourite, hence he wasn't "supposed to lose so many times before". Err...I kind of did admit that with the "yes". You asked a question and I answered it with yes at the start of my reply. Chill out.

10y ago

b00g13man

Yes. I'm open minded, if my point was factually proven to be wrong, I won't continue to argue for the sake of pride. Your point was proven wrong by the poster with the betting odds. He's always been the favourite, hence he wasn't "supposed to lose so many times before".

10y ago

SalimShady1212

:lol1: No it doesn't. it shows how highly you rate his opponent. He fought marquee names each time you retard :haha: if only Brook fought the same names and we'd see if he was the favourite. Maybe now but not at the time Khan fought him as Brook was doing it the hard boy fighting nobodies.

10y ago

SalimShady1212

So you agree that your first statement was bull****, and he wasn't supposed to lose many times before? Yes. I'm open minded, if my point was factually proven to be wrong, I won't continue to argue for the sake of pride.

10y ago

G_Child_123

I asked this because it seems like all the pro-Brook people are saying Porter beats Khan since that's Brook's best win. I favour Porter slightly over Khan, I feel his style gives him problems. That is independent of Brook's win over Porter. I think Brook is a more winnable fight for Khan, I see that 50/50 right now.

10y ago

b00g13man

It's not an arguement. It's a fact, if you believe that Khan wasn't supposed to lose; it shows how highly he's rated. So you agree that your first statement was bull****, and he wasn't supposed to lose many times before?

10y ago

Caught_Square

He may fight Porter, I've not questioned that fact. He sure as hell slying his way out of a fight with Brook though. In fact some clarification from Amir and Kell on their next opponents would be greatly appreciated. fans in general? I asked this because it seems like all the pro-Brook people are saying Porter beats Khan since that's Brook's best win.

10y ago

LacedUp

Are there any Brook fans who think Khan wins this? fans in general?

10y ago

LacedUp

It's not an arguement. It's a fact, if you believe that Khan wasn't supposed to lose; it shows how highly he's rated. :lol1: No it doesn't. it shows how highly you rate his opponent.

10y ago

SalimShady1212

Your argument is all over the place. Which one is it? Are there "many" fights he was supposed to lose, or is he so highly rated that he loses fights he's supposed to win? It's not an arguement. It's a fact, if you believe that Khan wasn't supposed to lose; it shows how highly he's rated.

10y ago

G_Child_123

How do you know Khan won't fight Porter? He may fight Porter, I've not questioned that fact. He sure as hell slying his way out of a fight with Brook though. In fact some clarification from Amir and Kell on their next opponents would be greatly appreciated.

10y ago

Caught_Square

I'm a Brook fan and I see it as a 50/50 fight. The beef is the fact Khan won't take the fight. How do you know Khan won't fight Porter?

10y ago

G_Child_123

Are there any Brook fans who think Khan wins this? I'm a Brook fan and I see it as a 50/50 fight. The beef is the fact Khan won't take the fight.

10y ago

b00g13man

Again just shows how highly Khan is rated amongst actual experts. Your argument is all over the place. Which one is it? Are there "many" fights he was supposed to lose, or is he so highly rated that he loses fights he's supposed to win?

10y ago