1995 Tyson vs prime Hearns,Hagler,Leonard and Duran on the same night.Does Tyson win?

Hearns was 6 ft 1 with 78 inch reach, he finished his career at cruiserweight, so naturally he's bigger than Tyson who was 5 ft 10 with 71 inch reach. WTF? No, naturally, Hearns is taller. That's it. Most definitely not bigger. Both at the age of 22 when Tyson was in his prime there was getting close to 80 pounds in weight difference. Tyson 220 and Hearns 147. Hearns is not bigger. He's taller, but much smaller in terms of overall mass and natural size. That's like saying Brock Lesnar and Anderson Silva are the same size.

WTF man??? Hearns bigger than Tyson?? Hearns was pretty much the most spindly boxer of any note in the history of boxing. He makes Wilder look solid! Tyson fought a bigger version of Hearns in Ratliff and knocked him clean the **** out! Tyson would breath on Hearns and knock him out. You correctly identified Duran as being a rabbit being torn to pieces by a rabid pit bull. Leonard going 5+ rounds WTF? Look what the guy did to Michael Spinks! Look at the guys he had to contend with in 95!! No way could Hagler or Leonard run that long from Tyson let alone try and fight him! Some ****ed up **** on this thread. This thread is so disrespectful to Tyson!! Tyson beats all 4 in a total time count of 2:30..... ^^ Believe it! Hearns was 6 ft 1 with 78 inch reach, he finished his career at cruiserweight, so naturally he's bigger than Tyson who was 5 ft 10 with 71 inch reach.

Even blocked punches from Tyson would KO all of these guys. They're four weight classes apart, and he was destroying natural heavyweights who were physically much larger than him.

While Hearns would have a good chance cuz he's naturally bigger than Tyson, he is taller and has the reach advantage, he can also stick and move and throw hard punches, still his chin was too weak, once he gets hit, which he definitley will, it'll be all over. Duran doesn't have a chance whatsoever, I see Hagler lasting longer than Duran but it's only a matter of time before he gets KOed, if Leonard could effectively use his foot work and manage to frustrate Tyson for the first 5-6 rounds, he can go the 12 rounds but I don't see him winning, Tyson always had stamina problems and after 5-6 rounds of chasing air he'll be gassed, but still if he connects it'll be very hard for Leonard or for any of these fighters to recover. WTF man??? Hearns bigger than Tyson?? Hearns was pretty much the most spindly boxer of any note in the history of boxing. He makes Wilder look solid! Tyson fought a bigger version of Hearns in Ratliff and knocked him clean the **** out! Tyson would breath on Hearns and knock him out. You correctly identified Duran as being a rabbit being torn to pieces by a rabid pit bull. Leonard going 5+ rounds WTF? Look what the guy did to Michael Spinks! Look at the guys he had to contend with in 95!! No way could Hagler or Leonard run that long from Tyson let alone try and fight him! Some ****ed up **** on this thread. This thread is so disrespectful to Tyson!! Tyson beats all 4 in a total time count of 2:30..... ^^ Believe it!

While Hearns would have a good chance cuz he's naturally bigger than Tyson, he is taller and has the reach advantage, he can also stick and move and throw hard punches, still his chin was too weak, once he gets hit, which he definitley will, it'll be all over. Duran doesn't have a chance whatsoever, I see Hagler lasting longer than Duran but it's only a matter of time before he gets KOed, if Leonard could effectively use his foot work and manage to frustrate Tyson for the first 5-6 rounds, he can go the 12 rounds but I don't see him winning, Tyson always had stamina problems and after 5-6 rounds of chasing air he'll be gassed, but still if he connects it'll be very hard for Leonard or for any of these fighters to recover.

Sequentially, Mike Tyson, any version no matter, would of course easily beat all of them on the same night! In probably as many rounds too! Probably within 3 minutes of total ring time also!!! The only real question would be, could the 4 of them gang up on Mike Tyson together at the same time and prevail.. That's be a different proposition maybe.

Do you seriously believe Mike Tyson after prison was the same man as before? He was in prison for 3 years. His last fight before prison was 1991, and his next one was in 1995. You've got to be kidding me. You're right that he would destroy them all, though. Look what he did to Michael Spinks. It would be all KOs in the 1st round. No they didn't diminish. Tyson fought a ****load of bums pre-prison and looked better then he actually was. In fact, Tyson POST PRISON, was a stronger, heavier harder puncher then the KID TYSON preprison, although after prison he had less movement.

Tyson was accustomed to taking shots of guys 200lb plus. I think the movement and speed may cause a problem for Tyson though. But at the same time they would feel very ucomfortable getting pressured by Tyson When Tyson connects, and he will it would be over especially if he lands on hearns

I'll answer it seriously, why not Yes Tyson wins. Size difference is too much, hes a legit 220 lbs heavy in 1995, and while past his best, hes legit top 5 heavyweight in the WORLD. No matter how much you want to say he declined, he is still elite level here, he is not the heavyweight part time amateur guy that Hagler and SRL may have sparred at their gym. All 4 are getting stopped, they can try to use movement to avoid a KO loss but they arent going to be scoring so they have no way to outpoint. You can look at something like RJJ vs Ruiz, and I would say Tyson was better than Ruiz, the fab 4 are significantly smaller than a cruiserweight RJJ. Ruiz was a guy picked for RJJ who would allow him to use his speed on the outside along with movement to score a wide UD. I cant see the fab 4 being effective in trying to dart in and out with Tyson, while scoring enough to win rounds and not get caught. there I answered seriously, idk its interesting enough I was thinking putting leonard in there first to use his fancy footwork to make tyson miss and get him tired.

I'll answer it seriously, why not Yes Tyson wins. Size difference is too much, hes a legit 220 lbs heavy in 1995, and while past his best, hes legit top 5 heavyweight in the WORLD. No matter how much you want to say he declined, he is still elite level here, he is not the heavyweight part time amateur guy that Hagler and SRL may have sparred at their gym. All 4 are getting stopped, they can try to use movement to avoid a KO loss but they arent going to be scoring so they have no way to outpoint. You can look at something like RJJ vs Ruiz, and I would say Tyson was better than Ruiz, the fab 4 are significantly smaller than a cruiserweight RJJ. Ruiz was a guy picked for RJJ who would allow him to use his speed on the outside along with movement to score a wide UD. I cant see the fab 4 being effective in trying to dart in and out with Tyson, while scoring enough to win rounds and not get caught. there I answered seriously, idk its interesting enough

Actually Tyson skills DIDN'T dimish, he just wasn't fighting BUMS anymore and was fighting the likes of Evander Holyfield who has BETTER skill. Tyson knocks them all out, none of them can take his punch. Do you seriously believe Mike Tyson after prison was the same man as before? He was in prison for 3 years. His last fight before prison was 1991, and his next one was in 1995. You've got to be kidding me. You're right that he would destroy them all, though. Look what he did to Michael Spinks. It would be all KOs in the 1st round.

Who do you think he is? 'Honey' Roy Palmer or something? :boxing:

I know these fighters are smaller then Tyson, that is why I am saying all 4. Lets say Tyson in 1995 had to fight all 4 of these guys at their best on the same night. Tyson's skill by this year is diminished. So lets say if Tyson fought each of these guys on one night individually, would he be able to pull it off and beat all 4 or would he get stopped by the 3rd or 4th fighter? Lets say Tsyon beats the first fighter. He wont get a quick rest. The second fighter would immediately jump in the ring and challenge him. List the order of fighters you think should face Tyson first to last to get the job done. I remember George Foreman doing something like this after his loss to Ali. Actually Tyson skills DIDN'T dimish, he just wasn't fighting BUMS anymore and was fighting the likes of Evander Holyfield who has BETTER skill. Tyson knocks them all out, none of them can take his punch.

I know these fighters are smaller then Tyson, that is why I am saying all 4. Lets say Tyson in 1995 had to fight all 4 of these guys at their best on the same night. Tyson's skill by this year is diminished. So lets say if Tyson fought each of these guys on one night individually, would he be able to pull it off and beat all 4 or would he get stopped by the 3rd or 4th fighter? Lets say Tsyon beats the first fighter. He wont get a quick rest. The second fighter would immediately jump in the ring and challenge him. List the order of fighters you think should face Tyson first to last to get the job done. I remember George Foreman doing something like this after his loss to Ali. http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=15291046&postcount=8

come on guys