Oscar, and it is not even close.
Cotto isn't even worthy enough to hold Oscars Jockstrap, But Oscar would want him too and Cotto would gladly hold it for him.
I like that people keep giving me green k for this comment.
See, no substance. I actually back my sh*t up, unlike every single person who posted on here. Cotto has more wins against similar competition and less losses, but Oscar is better right? Only because he's Mexican, at least keep it real guys.
Bruh.he American.Mexican.
Augustus was getting in floyds arce at times.
The drunken master was very underated and thank God he pulled through that cowardly act (shooting point blank in the back of the head by a bottom feeder)
He is a tough son of a gun. He is walking and talking again
Can everybody just get along and not be so negative towards each other. Oscar and cotto are good fighters but there not on bikas level.
Lol..................
No I was just specifically thinking about the Hopkins fight. Sorry that I forgot someone's fights that happend 10-15 years ago. I do have other things to worry about, I'm not unemployed.
Unemployed??? who's unemployed?? certainly not me if that is what you are trying to say...and just admit you dont know what you are talking about because it shows in your posts
What does him not liking Oscar have to do with anything? Floyd always said Emmanuel Augustus was the hardest fight of his career, until that Cotto fight. Also, if you watch the Oscar fight you would know those cards were as bad as the Canelo judging. Oscar won 2 rounds if that.
On a showtime interview around the guerrero or canelo fight, steve farhood asked floyd what was his toughest fight up to date, he said Augustus and how the no names sometimes are the toughest challenges. cant find the clip but remember that clear as day. food for thought.
Cottos stans picking Cotto or slightly. :lol1: Cotto isn't anywhere near. Specially with resume/accomplishments. This thread now makes me regret picking Floyd fan boys as the worst.
They've both have had very similar careers - it's sort of eerie how similar of a career they've had. Arum mapped out their careers as if they were twins. They've had some big wins and some bad losses. If Cotto's careers ended today, I'd favor Oscar just slightly, probably virtue of the titles he amassed over the span of what, six divisions - not because of any amount of massive wins he accumulated
If Cotto was able to muster up another big win, like over GGG or Mayweather, then I'd probably favor Cotto
The man actually said Oscar never won a MW title..and then asked who he beat like Cotto has great wins or something
No I was just specifically thinking about the Hopkins fight. Sorry that I forgot someone's fights that happend 10-15 years ago. I do have other things to worry about, I'm not unemployed.
On top of that,oscar didnt belong at 160. Pudgy slow and he topped out imo at 154.
147 vs tito a better rican witha better career then cotto as well.oscar outclassed him..
Prime oscar beats prime floyd imo.shane cheated.vs pac he was draimed and past it obviously..looked like a drained c minus fighter. No better then chris algeiri that night.
5 loses are garbage really. Floyd beat a part time past it oscar fighting at b minus level imo.but it counts..other 5 losses dont define him ...
Oscar was a bad man.
Oscar easily. Oscar has way better wins. And a few of his losses were pure robberies. He really should only have 3 or 4 losses. Cotto has some good wins, but Oscar has the better overall resume.