I joked this morning on another forum that they canceled his fight because of a drug test. Come back from work and he failed, lmao. I'm a little surprised at how easy all these MMA guys are failing, they knew the tests were coming and they still don't test them in between fights.
Hector Lombard has never won a belt in the UFC. Broner has in boxing. Lombard needs to shut his mouth.
Come on Brush, I know you know better than that! There's 4 belts per division. You could be a champion and be like the 3rd or 4th best fighter in that division. Lol look at Kell Brook, he's a champion but he didn't beat May or Pac to be the champ. In the UFC there's none of that! If you wanna be the champ, you gotta beat the champ!
NAC: Hector Lombard failed UFC 182 drug test
Hector Lombard failed his UFC 182 fight night drug test, according to a Nevada Athletic Commission report obtained by MMAFighting.com.
http://gifsforum.com/images_new/gif/lol/grand/oh_lol_gif.gif
The 37-year-old Lombard tested positive for the anabolic steroid desoxymethyltestosterone, according to the report. Online resource Wikipedia calls the performance-enhancing drug, which is also known as "DMT," "one of the first designer steroids to be marketed as a PED to athletes and bodybuilders."
Lombard defeated Josh Burkman via unanimous decision at UFC 182 on Jan. 3. The win improved his record as a welterweight to 3-0.
http://www.mmafighting.com/2015/2/10/8014473/nac-hector-lombard-failed-ufc-182-drug-test
lmao!!!!!!
http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/9132/h1i.gif
Hector is a pretty big dude and he walks around at 200 pounds. He's a tank....Here is Hector sparring with boxer Shannon Taylor.
He would maul broner in a boxing ring with his size. Lets not act like broner is some superhero lol.
Lombard is a roid head that doesn't have 5% of the fighting ability that Broner has.
Lombard = C- level athlete
Broner = B+
LOL at any OLYMPIAN being considered a C- level athlete
always annoys me when fighters talk trash for no reason. mind games, building up a fight etc comes with the sport but this is none of that. its just lombard being a d!ck, because calling out a man who fights 30lbs south of your weight class is a real d!ck move.
funny thing is broner would still take him to school in a boxing ring, he may not have been what he was hyped up to be but he can fight. more importantly there is a big difference in level between boxing and mma as far as striking ability goes. BIG difference. broner would embarrass him.
I completely agree. People who compare an MMA fight to a street fight are retarded. Boxing is proven to work on the streets against multiple opponents. If an MMA fighter tried to beat 2-3 guys on the street they would get their head stomped while on the ground.
In a street fight the best is to
A - walk away if you can
B - end the other guy as fast as you can if you HAVE to fight. That would often be a straight punch, so yeah being a boxer would be a major advantage.
How did you reach that conclusion?
Because it's use of "complete" fighting or "real" fighting is nonsense. Can't elbow down, can't knee when a guy is down, can't head butt. Boxing is a "realer" style of fighting given the fact you will see two guys trying to knock each other out but you'll hardly ever see two guys rolling around trying to submit each other.....why? Because it's retarded. The ONLY reason to take someone down is because you can't compete with hands. So if guys like Lara and Floyd are cowards for trying to "box" then taking someone down is just about the biggest ***** move in the world.
I hate how all the MMA fanboys on this site come out whenever UFC/MMA is talked about. No one wants to hear you boast about how amazing it is and everyone in it is. That sport has jsut as many faults and problems as boxing. It's no better and has hardly any talent.
How did you reach that conclusion?
I hate how all the MMA fanboys on this site come out whenever UFC/MMA is talked about. No one wants to hear you boast about how amazing it is and everyone in it is. That sport has jsut as many faults and problems as boxing. It's no better and has hardly any talent.
Would he say it to his face though...
Lombard is an Olympian in Judo, fights at 170 and is built like a tank. I prefer boxing over MMA, but he would ragdoll/maul broner anywhere.
That's just stupid. An MMA fighter is not beating a professional boxer in a boxing match. You don't see them trying to do that either.
Size being the main factor no, boxer will always come on top.... Agreed
Normally side with the boxer but in this one I don't see Broner coming out on top whether a boxing match or MMA.. no matter the size.
That's just stupid. An MMA fighter is not beating a professional boxer in a boxing match. You don't see them trying to do that either.
Who did broner best for all those titles.. Broner was always a paper champ which is about the same as being a bellator champ in mma..
Lombard would knock out broner, you, and urban Meyer in the same night..
In MMA you're not really protected. It is always Super Six every time, so his Bellator title is better than any of Broner's title wins. MMA is not just about belts, but names on your record and Broner only has Demarco.
Lombard's Jake Shields non-title win alone surpasses all of Broner's career. Not to mention Lombard is an Olympian and has won many International Judo tournaments including World Championships.