Ortiz Trolling Berto on Twitter

Unfortunately it's now too late for a rematch between Ortiz and Bertolucci because Ortiz' jaw was broken badly and it is evidently permanently damaged as seen in his fight against Collazo. In my opinion had A rematch between Ortiz and Berto happened before Ortiz' jaw injury occurred we would've seen another great fight with either Ortiz winning by UD or possibly even KO. Unfortunately things are totally different now and I just don't believe that Ortiz' jaw can hold up in a tough fight anymore, and it's not to take anything away from him because he was a tough fighter with a solid chin before but he just suffered a bad and permanent injury.

Winning this rematch will get Ortiz the rematch against Mayweather.

Honestly Ortiz-Berto 2 is the biggest fight for either guy at the moment..would love to see it get signed

:lol1: You know what, this actually isn't a bad idea.

ortiz vs guerrero would be entertaining

I wouldn't mind a rematch

Yes... as well as the Guerrero fight. Such a good fight vs Guerrero , I thought Berto might break his neck with them uppercuts.

this is from yesterday LOL. :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

This is kinda funny, because both guys are still names in the sport, but both guys at this point are incredibly irrelevant.

Ortiz really needs a soft touch first. Guy needs to fight an Upsher Chambers type like Berto did. Then put them in the ring together. First one was a war and their defenses have only gotten worse since so I wouldn't expect anything but another war

this is from yesterday

Fight one and 3 were definite Marquez wins. Fight 2 is a toss up. There have been times where I watched it 4 times and I had different scores each time. I scored fight 2 for Marquez 3 times and for Pacquiao once. The third judge, Burt Clements, had a 113-113 tie. His scoring included a 10-7 opening round because, he admitted later, he did not realize he could give a 10-6 round. If Clements had scored the opening round 10-6, as the other two judges had, Pacquiao would have won by 113-112 on Clements's card and earned a split decision. "I just screwed up," Clements said. "I feel badly because I dropped the ball, plainly and simply. You can make a lot of arguments that it was a very close fight, but that's immaterial. The fact is, I dropped the ball." Marc Ratner, the executive director of the Nevada State Athletic Commission, ruled that Clements's admission was no grounds for a protest. The above quote is from Boxrec...it is common knowledge around BoxingScene that Pacquiao got robbed of a win in the first meeting.

Both are shot to sh1t and have 0 defense which mean an all out brawl..... Makes sense.

Both are shot to sh1t and have 0 defense which mean an all out brawl.....

Fight one and 3 were definite Marquez wins. Fight 2 is a toss up. There have been times where I watched it 4 times and I had different scores each time. I scored fight 2 for Marquez 3 times and for Pacquiao once. 1st fight one of the judges couldn't count to 3 and only counted 2 of the 3 knock downs, scored correctly Pacquiao wouldve won by a point. Pacquiao 2 was a close win for Pacquiao 3 was a draw. Juan blew it by taking off the 12th round in reguards of terrible advice from Nacho

ortiz might be a quitter but he beat this dude already, the rematch needs to happen

Oh please the only unfair decision was the 3rd fight. It should've been a draw Fight one and 3 were definite Marquez wins. Fight 2 is a toss up. There have been times where I watched it 4 times and I had different scores each time. I scored fight 2 for Marquez 3 times and for Pacquiao once.

No way. Marquez got Robbed vs Pacquiao all those times to the point that you can't call it an upset. Oh please the only unfair decision was the 3rd fight. It should've been a draw

Upset of the year/decade/century. No way. Marquez got Robbed vs Pacquiao all those times to the point that you can't call it an upset.

I thought Pacquiao vs Marquez 4 got fight of the year in 2012. Upset of the year/decade/century.