Where has this come from? He's not a good boxer. People think of him as this guy with great skills, slick defense, speed, awesome footwork, yet he has very little of any of that stuff.
His speed is ok, pretty standard in fact.
His footwork is very straight forward and basic, absolutely nothing special. A lot of it actually hinders him, rather than helps and he rarely uses it to set guys up well.
His jab is decent, not great, not even that good. It's decent.
His defense is ****e.
His overall skills are lacking and his technique a bit ****e.
He has been outboxed a lot over his career. He's not a guy, like I've seen written many, many, many times, that would be a great of this era if he had power.
So, where did this myth come from? It couldn't have come from his fights, because he's been outboxed a lot and if people had seen most of his fights, they'd understand that he's gotten by on volume and very basic boxing offense and just being a bit better than the ****ty contenders he's mostly beaten. He's been outfought, outboxed, and outsmarted and if he was a good boxer, he would never have had the trouble with all the mediocre contenders that he's always struggled to beat. He would have clearly beaten many of the guys he's fought and done much better against the guys he's lost to if he had all these skills that people say of him.
The notion that Paulette was ever anything above average was always one of the funniest things to me on b-scene. Credit to him for being a C plus fighter that greatly overachieved -- he parlayed really, really mediocre skills into a nice little career and a cushy commentating gig, but the talk around here about how he was some great pure boxer...sh*t is/was funny.
He's the definition of average.
You should look up the definition of average. Because your definition is wrong.
Half the power? Paulie's got 7 kos, Herra 4 and while Bradley has a few more kos, Bradley just goes for it, he engages and he tries to take your head off and eventually he wears guys down. Paulie, he'd rather flick a jab and arm punch straight right hand. That's about it. Jab, jab, ten thousand jabs and a right hand.
As far as i know Bradley doesnt suffer from hand problems, Mallignaggi does. Cant compare the two
Malignaggi is a good fighter. He sticks his jab out, has decent footwork, and comes in shape. He's had decent wins, but the fact that he can't earn a fighter's respect with a lack of punching power has been his downfall. He couldn't back up porter and porter just worked the inside and Tyson'd Malignaggi. He's a two time world champ for a reason and has fought world class. Even when he commentates he's always on point. He sees things he would do and points out things these "experts" don't notice.
Not really - when you look at guys like Mauricio Herrera and Tim Bradley who have 4 and 12 kos respectively. Now compare their skill level with that of Paulie and you would have an idea why I don't think Paulie is a good boxer at the elite level.
Paulie has half the power of both and could beat Herrera.
Cotto never stopped him it was actually a close fight , most peoplenever watchedit Cotto won by maybe 2 or 3rds
The notion that Paulette was ever anything above average was always one of the funniest things to me on b-scene. Credit to him for being a C plus fighter that greatly overachieved -- he parlayed really, really mediocre skills into a nice little career and a cushy commentating gig, but the talk around here about how he was some great pure boxer...sh*t is/was funny.
He's the definition of average.
he is a good boxer hes just past it, hes not an all time great but hes held his own in the sport something alot of us couldnt do
Porter is the real deal
Paulie was a solid fighter, them legs aint as young as they used to be...and Porter came at him pretty relentlessly...Cotto didn't stop Paulie like someone said in this thread I saw...
Credit to Porter...maybe its time for Paulie to hang em up...
Paulie has had a wonderful career. He was absolutely beasted on last night. I don't want to see him manhandled like that again. Time to call it a career.
its pretty strange how margarito is an overrated bum although he was #1 for years and beat cotto, clottey, martinez, and a bunch of other top 10 fighters but paulie is so highly regarded for doing nothing but getting destroyed by top guys. i think it all comes down to styles. some people simply think guys who move around and jab are superior to guys who come forward and try to destroy you.
Pure, unadulterated, unfiltered hate, not only for Paulie but for Porter, that young, hungry champion just battered a guy who hasn't been beaten that convincingly...ever! Yes Khan and Cotto stopped him and stopped him big but they didn't do it as quick and there were moments for Paulie. Porter annihilated him.
Give credit where credit due, Malignaggi was a terrific fighter, not great, not exceptional but very good, like a large number of "names" around and Porter made easy work. Porter is for real.
He's a pro boxer in the top 10 of the division,has competed with elite guys and won rounds. Not with his power was it. It was his boxing skills.
So insisting he's not a good boxer is a rather an exaggeration.
Listen, we know that he's a good or even great fighter if you compare him to myself, yourself and a bunch of regular Joes.
However, he is not a good boxer at the elite level in boxing.
He lost badly to Cotto, Hatton, Khan and Porter. He lost 7 or 8 rounds to Broner, he got a gift against Cano.
Now if your argument is that beating N'Dou who everybody has beat and Senchenko make him a good fighter in boxing's elite you're delusional.
He acuses Broner of being spoon fed. Broner's actually beat better guys than N'Dou and Senchenko. See Paulie's record before Cotto, it is very cotton-like.
Any boxer being in the top 20,30 is good, really good and it's tough, tougher than we can imagine, especially if you've had 4 hand surgeries but the fact of the matter Paulie at world championship boxing has always been the weakest link.
i dunno juan diaz was the man b4 paulie OUTBOXED HIM twice
paulie literally went to a gun fight with a knife , fight after fight and not just any gun fight ...with the worlds best shooters ! and hung in there and sometimes won !...fukin amazing if u ask me
Troll after Troll after Troll
this site is ****
yeah hes such a terrible boxer he got 2 world titles with no punching power
ive seen paulie dismantle the #1 152# amateur (patrick day) in the US down in my gym, TOY with him ..
hes 33 and been in a handful of wars ,he went out like a champ and gave no excuses
porters the real deal !
people CRITICIZING never even stepped foot in a ring , you have noooooooooooooooooooo idea what it takes no fuking clue !
by far the toughest sport in the world to succeed in BY FAR
theres a reason ppl where still cheering for paulie after the match
ATG post brother :fing02:
Green k on its way
Troll after Troll after Troll
this site is ****
yeah hes such a terrible boxer he got 2 world titles with no punching power
ive seen paulie dismantle the #1 152# amateur (patrick day) in the US down in my gym, TOY with him ..
hes 33 and been in a handful of wars ,he went out like a champ and gave no excuses
porters the real deal !
people CRITICIZING never even stepped foot in a ring , you have noooooooooooooooooooo idea what it takes no fuking clue !
by far the toughest sport in the world to succeed in BY FAR
theres a reason ppl where still cheering for paulie after the match
Paulie Malinaggi is a great fighter. Is he the best ever? No.
Has he ever been the best in his division? No.
But not everyone is a HOF fighter. Not every fighter is a Mayweather, Pacquiao, Marquez type fighter.
Malinaggi is a two division world champion who has been in there with the best, and up until last night he had never been embarrassed like that. The guy is definitely not A class fighter, but to say he is a journeyman is or as your title suggest not a good boxer is ridiculous.
The best way to describe Pauli is "decent".
He's a decent fighter, not really impressive in any area other than perhaps speed. He's quite fast.
He's tough as nails and has a good chin and can talk.
Managed to become and solid name for toughing it out in losing performances to top fighters aswell as having a lot to say whilst doing very little.
He is so far from a good boxer. Hatton outboxed him at times for crying out loud.
His defense is so bad and he's so ridiculously one dimensional.
The fact Broner struggled with passed prime version of him and edged out a decision really tells you volumes about Broner. That fight was the day I knew what Broner's real potential was I.e Not bright.
he's a good fighter like zab Judah. not a HOF guy but a very solid fighter. in almost every fight he's in he is outgunned. he has some nice wins. the bottom line is he like zab Judah has a solid fanbase so everyone usually likes to fight him because a good crowd will show & a nice payday to come along with it. it is also a winnable fight. that is why Judah & paulie keep getting big fights. B level but still a good fighter.
I reckon I could beat Paulie. I would just repeatedly spam him with a leaping left hook which he seems completely unable to defend against until the ref jumps in.