Which of the Sanctioning Bodies is the most Credible?

What's corrupt is champions aren't forced to unify :lol1:

All are a joke.WWE belt seems more legit.

Credible, none!!!

all corrupt, what's the coolest looking one? everyone is saying wbc. I personally like the WBA belt. now whether it's the super or regular? I cannot answer that.

I dunno. Which type of cancer is the best to get?

WBC are biggest jokers in there. A farce of an organisation.

IBF are the most corrupt because they kept Peterson the champion even after he failed the test.

Bottom of the barrel is WBC and WBA. Not opinion, just a fact. As far as a sanctioning body sticking to its own rules more often than not it's the IBF. That said its a pick your poison proposition. TBRB is the ONLY rankings without agendas. GBP ruined the Ring belt with their dumb rule changes.

i love it how *******s can take any subject, in this case sanctioning bodies and find a way to both bash floyd and praise manny in it. every single post no matter the subject. I love how Mayweather isn't listed among your favourite fighters, even though you've always done a pretty pitiful job in hiding your undying love for him on this site. A large chunk of your posts always seem to be related to defending him or whining about others criticising him. Why are you too much of a coward to acknowledge your fandom?

I usually respect the WBO and WBC the most. Collecting belts is like collecting Pokemon gym badges these days. You collect enough to be the 'best', then they come out with a new game, with even more badges.

i love it how *******s can take any subject, in this case sanctioning bodies and find a way to both bash floyd and praise manny in it. every single post no matter the subject. What are you talking about,,, nobody has mentioned floyd at all, and i only used manny-margs as an example of how WBC is corrupt, I could have just as easily used morales-cano as a garbage title fight,, or the floyd-bruscles eliminator.. i wasnt praising manny, i was calling his 8th title a joke Correction,, i didnt notice the OP using floyd's sucker punch of ortiz.... Now i know what your talking about

There is foolery in all of the sanctioning bodies. As a result, I favor whatever belt looks cooler. WBO and WBC I agree with this. I like the wbc because its green and ali had that belt.

i love it how *******s can take any subject, in this case sanctioning bodies and find a way to both bash floyd and praise manny in it. every single post no matter the subject. What are you talking about,,, nobody has mentioned floyd at all, and i only used manny-margs as an example of how WBC is corrupt, I could have just as easily used morales-cano as a garbage title fight,, or the floyd-bruscles eliminator.. i wasnt praising manny, i was calling his 8th title a joke

i love it how *******s can take any subject, in this case sanctioning bodies and find a way to both bash floyd and praise manny in it. every single post no matter the subject.

No way can the WBC seem credible,, arent they the ones that made manny-margs at 150 for a 154 vacant belt, even though manny had never fought at that weight, and margs had lost there and had minimal success vs cab drivers at 154

Wbc wba ibf wbo

None,,,, they are all corrupt and are all horrible,,

WBC seems to be the most recognizable. truth is it's the most corrupt. one example, mayweather sucker punched his way to the 147 belt ages ago and he's still listed as their champ. WBO on the other hand strip fighters of belt all the time. pacquiao won against bradley, review commision even said so but they still did not reverse the decision. WBA has two types of champion, a world champion and a "super" world champion. wtf? arum once said he had to pay them to have his fighters ranked higher. IBF champions pretty much earn jack shit. they've been linked with racketeering and bribery. it's all for good business i guess. your thoughts? There is foolery in all of the sanctioning bodies. As a result, I favor whatever belt looks cooler. WBO and WBC

WBC seems to be the most recognizable. truth is it's the most corrupt. one example, mayweather sucker punched his way to the 147 belt ages ago and he's still listed as their champ. WBO on the other hand strip fighters of belt all the time. pacquiao won against bradley, review commision even said so but they still did not reverse the decision. WBA has two types of champion, a world champion and a "super" world champion. wtf? arum once said he had to pay them to have his fighters ranked higher. IBF champions pretty much earn jack shit. they've been linked with racketeering and bribery. it's all for good business i guess. your thoughts? I find it funny that you're example of the WBCs ineptness fits your agenda. Most credible sanctioning body? Kind of a who's the tallest midget arguement