After one fight...

You didn't mention it...you don't give Pac credit for destroying him yet by your sig....you are proud of the SD by Mayweather and point out one of the few significant punches of that fight yet Pac gets no credit? Laughable...No credit for a bigger Clottey no credit for a bigger Hatton, no credit for anybody and why because you dissaprove? GTFO. You're a joke bro. I hope Mayweather is paying you good money for this. Who cares what fighters did against him they were bigger and he destroyed them. Wow Floyd huggers are the worst Jesus Joseph & Mary. I gave Pac credit for beating Cotto & Marg. I gave him credit for his KO of Hatton but I also said he is sort of tailor made for Pac. Do I need to bold these bits up for you? I am proud of the SD by Floyd? Are you stupid you idiot. It's a sig. I like the sig because it showed a great piece of defensive skill from Floyd. Of course I don't give him credit for whooping Clottey. Clottey didn't come to fight. If you actually can't get that through your idiotic head; you need to quit responding for real. You look stupider & stupider by the minute.

When did I mention that fight? Hatton winning many of the beginning rounds? Oh wait that one where Hatton threw a punch & missed as Floyd backed up & almost tripped? Right. Listen I give Pac credit where credit is due. He deserves credit for the way in which he dispatched these guys & for how he's rose threw the weights. But DLH was weight drained as **** & couldn't pull the trigger. Hatton came out trying to go to war with Pac; wrong choice. Hatton has limited head movement & didn't do anything SNR told him to do & Pac clocked him. Fair play. But you can't tell me Hatton wasn't an ideal fight for Pac. But if your gonna be a b*!ch about my sig; then clearly you haven't got anything important or knowledgeable to say back. If that's the case; I'd stay schtum bro. You didn't mention it...you don't give Pac credit for destroying him yet by your sig....you are proud of the SD by Mayweather and point out one of the few significant punches of that fight yet Pac gets no credit? Laughable...No credit for a bigger Clottey no credit for a bigger Hatton, no credit for anybody and why because you dissaprove? GTFO. You're a joke bro. I hope Mayweather is paying you good money for this. Who cares what fighters did against him they were bigger and he destroyed them. Wow Floyd huggers are the worst

Well I'm glad you don't speak for boxing history....Delahoya vs Mayweather was a really close fight and Floyd won by a split decision. Also Hatton was winning many of the beginning rounds against Floyd but not with Pacquiao... but I see you have one of the few effective punches of Floyd vs. Delahoya as a sig but discredit Pac for his total destruction of many of these fighters...I guess when you're biased you can pick and choose When did I mention that fight? Hatton winning many of the beginning rounds? Oh wait that one where Hatton threw a punch & missed as Floyd backed up & almost tripped? Right. Listen I give Pac credit where credit is due. He deserves credit for the way in which he dispatched these guys & for how he's rose threw the weights. But DLH was weight drained as **** & couldn't pull the trigger. Hatton came out trying to go to war with Pac; wrong choice. Hatton has limited head movement & didn't do anything SNR told him to do & Pac clocked him. Fair play. But you can't tell me Hatton wasn't an ideal fight for Pac. But if your gonna be a b*!ch about my sig; then clearly you haven't got anything important or knowledgeable to say back. If that's the case; I'd stay schtum bro.

Well I'm glad you don't speak for boxing history....Delahoya vs Mayweather was a really close fight and Floyd won by a split decision. Also Hatton was winning many of the beginning rounds against Floyd but not with Pacquiao... but I see you have one of the few effective punches of Floyd vs. Delahoya as a sig but discredit Pac for his total destruction of many of these fighters...I guess when you're biased you can pick and choose

So you are going to discredit the easy Mosley, Cotto and Margarito win? This is a smaller guy taking on the top guys in other weight classes. Yes he hasn't fought Mayweather but other than that what else can the "little guy" do to prove himself. The population of guys that can accomplish what Manny has in boxing is small. I don't discredit his Cotto & Marg performances. They were something else. But Mosley wasn't an impressive performance; partly due to Mosley running & Pac not making the correct adjustments (something which he hasn't shown he can do). Hatton was impressive due to the viscous nature of the KO but when someone comes swinging out at you like Hatton did you've got that chance. DLH @ the time you'd have to give him credit. But when you actually looked @ DLH coming into the ring and his pathetic physical condition; I don't give him any credit. And Clottey; no chance. I give no-one credit for beating that dude.

Beaten the best? C'mon. I'm not here to kick up a May-Pac debate but he ain't beaten Floyd. He's beaten fighters where Pac did have the advantages to an extent but I take nothing away from the mans accomplishments. But you say he's come along way? What proves that? Just because those people he ran through & demolished stood in front of him? That didn't improve anything other than the fact it highlighted Pac's power. This ^. To an extent it was done against Mosley. Those who laughed at Nazim for saying "we're showing guys how to beat this guy" look a little silly now. So you are going to discredit the easy Mosley, Cotto and Margarito win? This is a smaller guy taking on the top guys in other weight classes. Yes he hasn't fought Mayweather but other than that what else can the "little guy" do to prove himself. The population of guys that can accomplish what Manny has in boxing is small.

only people calling pac a bum now are flomos and crazed marquez fans. almost every great fighter has recieved backlash/set backs at some point in their career...and as far as i'm concerned no one can take away pac's achievements in the sport.

I don't think Mosley won a round on that card, Marquez always gave Manny problems. Manny has come a long way and has beaten the best in the division. Just because he always struggled with Marquez does not make him less of a fighter now. He is still a beast Beaten the best? C'mon. I'm not here to kick up a May-Pac debate but he ain't beaten Floyd. He's beaten fighters where Pac did have the advantages to an extent but I take nothing away from the mans accomplishments. But you say he's come along way? What proves that? Just because those people he ran through & demolished stood in front of him? That didn't improve anything other than the fact it highlighted Pac's power. His invincibility was shattered This ^. To an extent it was done against Mosley. Those who laughed at Nazim for saying "we're showing guys how to beat this guy" look a little silly now.

JMM said it.. he's the best in the world.

Only a small minority of users are saying Pacquiao is a bum now. The rest of us are just celebrating the fact that sanity seems to have returned to the boxing community, and peace has been restored to the forums. Sure, there are still tons of spastic 'tards running around making silly posts, but for the most part, this forum is enjoyable again, if only for the time being. Personally, I feel rather vindicated, as I've said loudly for a very long time that Pacquiao was still the same fighter he was in 2008, and got roundly ripped for my opinion.

His invincibility was shattered

I don't think Mosley won a round on that card, Marquez always gave Manny problems. Manny has come a long way and has beaten the best in the division. Just because he always struggled with Marquez does not make him less of a fighter now. He is still a beast

Hes by no means a bum but hes receiving the backlash of being portrayed as invincible. Not his fault though but he really should speak up more and stop playing puppet with bob arum.

I don't think people think Pac's a bum bar the casuals (who gives a **** about them) & the flomo's (same for them). But he's been distinctively poor in his last two fights. And its noticeable that he's struggled in his last two because those fighters were a smarter than those he crushed previously who just stood in front of him. Ok Mosley did "run" but alot of the time he was just circling Pac without throwing & Pac couldn't do nothing. He look frustrated and amateurish.