Could Mayweather beat Pavlik

Bernard is such a matchspoiler. We haven't seen Floyd around MW weight yet, he might get slow.

I think Pavlik got too discouraged to actually even try and find Hopkins. Hopkins did seem to be hurting him and roughed him up in the clinches.

did i say he was trash? dude , stfu. don't put words in other people's mouth just because they don't agree with you. when i picture this fight , i see pavlik having a hard time hitting floyd cleanly. better , faster , greater fighters have had a hard time hitting floyd and they had size advantages as well. pavlik can bother floyd with his size and reach but floyd would still be able to do enough to win some rounds. there will be some scary moments for floyd when he gets cornered but in the end i can see floyd still winning a decision. now stfu or at least talk to someone else. Twice you have brought up the fact that he lost to Bhop. Bhop is old, blah blah blah. It's annoying because you sound like a broken record. Quit bringing up the same bs. Sure everyone has a different opinion, but just because Pavlik got beat by an older fighter, doesn't make him slow or incapable of hitting Floyd.

There is the age issue again. I am not even going to get into that anymore. Some fighters do well at old age, some make a complete drop straight to retirement. All I got to say, Everyone is different. yeah, but did you see the bit where i put my main point is that pavlik couldnt find hopkins, so how is he gonna find mayweather?

"The hate for Money is ridiculous! Now y'all want him to fight a MW? He'd school Pavlik, then y'all would say Pavlik was one dimensional. Just admit it; y'all hate Money and will never give him credit for anything! Y'all some haters! Money is the best!" :banana::banana::banana:

pavlik may be bigger, but he has 0 skills and couldnt keep up with the speed of a 43 year old. my main point tho is that pavlik couldnt find hopkins, how is he gonna find mayweather! There is the age issue again. I am not even going to get into that anymore. Some fighters do well at old age, some make a complete drop straight to retirement. All I got to say, Everyone is different.

whatever. the guy is 43 yrs. old and pavlik couldn't hit him. he's also a bigger target. pavlik can't hit floyd. So basically, Pavlik is trash because he has 1 loss vs an ATG fighter. Pavlik is big, making him a bigger target. So if a fighter is bigger than their opponent, There is no advantage to the bigger man? And last but not least, Floyd is untouchable. Either your full of it, or I know nothing.

Has he ever fought anyone as big as Kelly Pavlik? You act like you know it all. So who has Floyd fought who is larger then him? Oscar de la hoya, height wise? I don't think Floyd has ever fought anyone over 5 foot 11. And he BARELY beat Oscar. If I was a judge, I would of given it to Oscar. Floyd made me yawn during that fight. do your research pavlik may be bigger, but he has 0 skills and couldnt keep up with the speed of a 43 year old. my main point tho is that pavlik couldnt find hopkins, how is he gonna find mayweather!

6'3, 170+ lbs might be too much for Mayweather but you never know. I certainly wouldn't count Mayweather out despite a size disadvantage. I also wouldn't say that it would be "easy".

Mayweathers fought bigger fighters his whole career JMM is the only fighter Floyd has had a significant weight advantage over do your research Has he ever fought anyone as big as Kelly Pavlik? You act like you know it all. So who has Floyd fought who is larger then him? Oscar de la hoya, height wise? I don't think Floyd has ever fought anyone over 5 foot 11. And he BARELY beat Oscar. If I was a judge, I would of given it to Oscar. Floyd made me yawn during that fight. do your research

I think Floyd would win a UD, potshotting and running all night. Pavlik is way too slow.

compared to floyd? i'm sorry but if he can't touch up a 43 yr. old 6 foot tall 170 lb. target , he ain't touching a 5 foot 8 155 lb. floyd running around pop shotting his ass. Floyd can't run from every punch. And you talk like this "43 yr. old 6 foot tall 170 lb target" is a amateur. Sure Bernard has had some poor performances, and age is starting to catch up to him, but this doesn't make Bernard a lesser threat in his division.

Could Mayweather beat Pavlik, would he ? lets forget for a min that he is fighting Williams. I dont rate Kelly very highly at all TBH, he is tough and has some pop and although im not saying Mayweather would definitely win, it would be a good risk reward fight for hm to take because he could! beat Pavlik and become MW Champ. Would you wanna see that, is it a dangerous enough fight, could he win ? i was saying this earlier on, it would be more titles in another division. pavlik would be easier to beat than mosley IMO.

Short and simple Short and simple - no

yes. and Chunk I think you meant yes too

If Floyd wants a (meaningless) belt at 160, he should fight Sebastian Sylvester. Sylvester is actually shorter than him.

Floyd would win and wouldn't get the credit.

i think floyd can beat pavlik. pavlik is very slow and nothing special. size difference would bother floyd but more than likely he can win by decision. Pavlik isn't that slow.

I think Pavlik would take it. All he would have to use is his height and reach to beat Mayweather. Plus Mayweather really doesn't fight people who are larger then him. And Pavlik is defiantly bigger than money. Mayweathers fought bigger fighters his whole career JMM is the only fighter Floyd has had a significant weight advantage over do your research

Ever since Pac unnaturally shot up the divisions, weight divisions don't seem to be important anymore. you say that but look at paulie vs diaz. diaz moved up and was hurt by a fighter who hits like a little girl. Also manny moved up against a weight drained fighter and another fighter who has no defence.