Morales vs Pacquiao 1?

EM had this attitude during that fight that was like: "Who the fukk are you"

What did Morales do in first fight to beat Pacquiao?i think he hit him

He used his length, toughness, and strong right hand. Kept his right hand on the side of his head and kept Pac at a distance.

hhhmmmm....you might be onto something there....the douchebaggery is eerily similar He does have reasonable grammar though, which leads me to believe otherwise. Maybe he's been going to the resource room and taking his pills.

you can't be stepping up to everyone that calls you out...that dude, with his red bar and cheesy bait brings nothing to the table...you would look like a bully for pounding him...no-win situation for you Dans I don't know how to pick my fights, that's the problem. Cats like him just roll up to me and I can't help but bite. I wonder if he's Xplosivo reincarnated?

Just makes the beating and embarassement that Pac did to Barrera that much more rewarding. What a DICK Barrera was.

Insecure little fanboys don't like the truth so they resort to blatant ignorance.Yes they were both cowards,yes they were both overrated(not really debatable) neither shall go down as an all time great and rightly so. I'm scared Makavelli, I need backup.

you made his day...he probably giggled like a schoolgirl after you replied That's why I didn't retaliate, it would have made me look like even more of a chump. See Mak, this is why I'm a journeyman. Getting schooled by newbies. :nonono:

i doubt it...you have to be sober to put on that type of attention whoring Too true Mak. He baited me good that bastard.

Morales clearly lost the third and first fight yet the first time around he recieved a gift decision barrera was the better fighter either way they were both cowards and both greatly overrated Are you drunk?

He boxed, but boxed wit aggression. He was able to take the left when he had to. EM used the jab and landed right hands to the body. He was stronger and bulled Pac to the ropes to flurry effectively. Aside from attackin well, he also showed counterin skills when Pac pressed him.

there are times i really think the 3rd fight was a draw...if the ref would have done his job and called those rabbit punches on MAB, EM wins easily :dance: On a side note, I think Barrera-Morales 3 is one of the most overrated fights of all time. I saw it live and thought it was very exciting. Then I bought the DVD and watched it a few times. Most of the excitement in the fight was generated purely off of the excitement of the first two fights. Not many clean effective punches landed at high percentages and a lot of the "fiery" exchanges were more smoke and mirrors than anything. I've probably watched the 3rd fight 4-5 times and it was a B level fight for excitement. This coming from one of the biggest El Terrible fans around. Most of the excitement in the broadcast is because Jim Lampley starts creaming his pants during each exchange.

gloves didn't matter. now the socks. that's a different story. :lol1: The reason Morales lost the 2nd and 3rd fight was because Pacman was able to choose the tape. Little cheater. :nonono:

really? by me saying he's not or never be the fighter El Terrible was? that's hating? Was not talking about that. We all have our opinion on certain fighters and we all know there are idiot fans in cotto, pacman, floyd, mosley fans.

gloves didn't matter. now the socks. that's a different story. :lol1: Don't forget the squabble/lawsuit with his former promoter Murad before the fight.

Give me a break. That's a pathetic excuse. Manny Stewart and other experts have said numerous times that it wouldn't have made a difference. Admit to Pac's only legit loss in his prime. Losing isn't the end of the world. Manny took the loss and learned from it, subsequently becoming a much better fighter. Losing to Morales was the greatest thing that ever happened to Pacman, career wise. I honestly think that Pacman LEARNED alot from that fight and look at him now. He is an ATG and a very good boxer who is rolling in money left and right. More props to pacman !

:boxing:Put it in the contract that Pac has to wear Winning gloves instead of his favorite gloves, Clito ris gloves.:boxing: Give me a break. That's a pathetic excuse. Manny Stewart and other experts have said numerous times that it wouldn't have made a difference. Admit to Pac's only legit loss in his prime. Losing isn't the end of the world. Manny took the loss and learned from it, subsequently becoming a much better fighter. Losing to Morales was the greatest thing that ever happened to Pacman, career wise.

i'm not here to hate son... dont ever question my boxing fanhood....i've been watching this sport for over 20 years and have appreciated 95% of the fighters i've watched....just because i see your hidden agendas a mile away and shoot them down with ease, doesnt mean i 'hate'...maybe on pathetically masked biases but never on fighters Funny, considering your cotto posts.

it bothers me because you have to ask a boxing forum to explain what YOU saw in that war? unless you never saw the fight I didn't, catching it now between breaks at work. Never saw the 2nd or 3rd fight. I never saw pacman vs barerra.

Morales said he watch and studied the first Pac-Marquez fight.