Well...Since another thread said "Who gave pacquiao a more convincing defeat? Marquez or Morales?"...Lets make another Poll...Who did Manny give a more thorough ass whopping?
1.) Marco Barrera - Had 2 fights with Manny. 1st fight was total beatdown. Brother had to stop the fight while crying and hugging Barrera post fight.In the 2nd fight, MAB ran for dear life and fought to survive not to win.
2.) Erik Morales - Has 1 victory over Manny but next 2 fights in the Trilogy were total domination. Suffered his only legitimate knockdowns against MP.
3.) David Diaz - The supposedly bigger man never won single round. Referee stopped fight after the one and only KD to avoid letting DD suffer more damage.
4.) Oscar dela Hoya - Same case with Diaz wherein Oscar never won a single round. ODLH sat on the stool and allowed his corner to signal the surrender.
I didnt include Marquez since both fights were close. The did kiss the canvass 4 times, he also gave MP hell in their 2 fights. Anyway, who among the 4 recieved the worst beating??
i wouldnt call the second morales total domination. manny pac can't dominate a guy like sven ottke could. you could be watching a sven ottke fight and think he's fighting like shit and losing every round but when they read the scorecards you realize how great he was in there.
lmao
reminded me of Hopkins, Calzaghe didn't see all those invisible slaps landing..most of the time it looked like he was flailing his arms in the air..incredible boxer..legend killer
DLH's size kept him from gettin literally KTFO even tho he was stopped. MAB had a few scattered moments in both fights. EM won the 1st, did good in the 2nd, and quit before the beatin could get too severe in the 3rd. Diaz just got beaten to a bloody pulp.
None, they are all shot. The fighters beat themselves, not Pac.
Thats ridiculous, who would ever believe that? You mean all those fights were for nothing???? For real now... I can't believe it...Only in Fantasy land, Mexico
That was MABs fault...Well, after the beatdown he recieved in the 1st fight, cant say I blame him for his fighting approach in the rematch.
Agreed, but Manny didn't do anything to make Marco fight either. Marco was there for the paycheck, and nothing more. When he let go, he had some good moments in the rematch, the problem was, he hardly ever let go.
With Marco being that inactive, Pacquiao could've likely knocked him out if he really went for it.
I'd say David Diaz, then Oscar De La Hoya, then either Barrera or Morales, not sure.
The second Morales fight wasn't even close to a beatdown. Morales owned him for the first half. And the second Barrera fight Manny didn't do shit to Marco aside from the cut on his cheek. The first Barrera fight was a beatdown though.
That was MABs fault...Well, after the beatdown he recieved in the 1st fight, cant say I blame him for his fighting approach in the rematch.
I'd say David Diaz, then Oscar De La Hoya, then either Barrera or Morales, not sure.
The second Morales fight wasn't even close to a beatdown. Morales owned him for the first half. And the second Barrera fight Manny didn't do shit to Marco aside from the cut on his cheek. The first Barrera fight was a beatdown though.
LOL at calling the second Morales fight "total domination". Morales was clearly superior for the first half of that fight.
As for the thread topic, both Diaz and Oscar were systematic beatdowns. You could take either of those IMO.
i wouldnt call the second morales total domination. manny pac can't dominate a guy like sven ottke could. you could be watching a sven ottke fight and think he's fighting like shit and losing every round but when they read the scorecards you realize how great he was in there.
17y ago
Who did Pacquiao beat more thoroughly? | BoxingScene Community