Would Would You Rather See Calzaghe Do: 1) Retire 2) Hopkins 3) Dawson ????

I think retirement should be the correct choice for Joe, but if he is tempted for 1 more fight (again), i'd rather see a Hopkins rematch as he is the only man i can see beating Joe. From a Calzaghe standpoint, beating a younger, prime fighter in Dawson will be better for his career, and moneywise would earn him the majority share. So the only fight capable of luring him back into the ring in my opinion is a Dawson fight in Wales, where Calzaghe calls the shots.

Rematch B-Hop in Wales :headbang:for us Hopkins fans, but for his legacy he needs to fight Chad. Bernard fought younger undefeated lions in JT and Pavlik at the end of his road and left those wars unscaved......I would like to see Joe mix it up with a young lion like Dawson.

How much money does dawson want. I'm sure Calzaghe doesn't come cheap, I doubt he'd put a huge risk like dawson for 50/50. It all depends on how much dawson wants Calzaghe, and how much money he wants. That is what it all comes down to. Most likely a 30/70 split and he's willing to fight in Wales, so that's going to help generate the money.

I want to see the Hopkins rematch before Hopkins gets any older. From a legacy standpoint the Dawson match is probably superior.

dawson has the most mandate being #1, prime, undefeated. johnson and calzaghe should have fought long ago and loss to dawson and hopkins, why would there be a push for that now? hopkins rematch would be good but not as much case as dawson. THERE IS NOBODY ELSE. How much money does dawson want. I'm sure Calzaghe doesn't come cheap, I doubt he'd put a huge risk like dawson for 50/50. It all depends on how much dawson wants Calzaghe, and how much money he wants. That is what it all comes down to.

There will always be someone else, dawson, johnson, and a rematch with hopkins. There is always someone else. Joe just retire, **** the haters, it doesn't matter who you beat they will always hate on you. dawson has the most mandate being #1, prime, undefeated. johnson and calzaghe should have fought long ago and loss to dawson and hopkins, why would there be a push for that now? hopkins rematch would be good but not as much case as dawson. THERE IS NOBODY ELSE.

there is nobody else besides Dawson, ppl need to stop with this there will always be somebody else theory. There will always be someone else, dawson, johnson, and a rematch with hopkins. There is always someone else. Joe just retire, **** the haters, it doesn't matter who you beat they will always hate on you.

He should retire! He doesnt have anything to prove. If he fights dawson and beats him there always be the next guy.So theres no need for that. And for the people saying he fights old guys well Joe is 36 and pass his prime, so quit bitch he is old too, is not like he is 28 fighting 38+ years old fighters. Joe is one of the greats. Haters wont recognize him, but real fans will. there is nobody else besides Dawson, ppl need to stop with this there will always be somebody else theory.

I think J.C should retire because he has nothing to prove whatsoever and should end his career on that note. But then again I just LOVE watching him fight. I'll sit on the fence with this one..

WHy fight Dawson when he can fight the man that beat Dawson? Johnson didn't beat him.

I'd like to see him retire, so all the haters have to deal with Calzaghe beating there favorite fighters and retiring.

I want to see him fight Dawson. WHy fight Dawson when he can fight the man that beat Dawson?

didnt calzaghe already do hopkins? he's a bum diddler.

Dawson obviously. I would not begrudge him wanting to retire though.

I want to see him fight Dawson.