bernard (who won their first, or at least deserved a draw) chad dawson, and JT
oh and maybe winky
Calzaghe won the first fight, but I agree that Bernard is the only boxer capable of beating Joe today. Nobody else comes close.
It wont be Dawson either. I dont like Calzaghe and I hope he gets beat in his next fight, but every time someone go's to reture or step up a weight they get accussed of "ducking" someone its repetitive nonsense.
Apparently Haye is moving up to heavy to avoid Cunningham"peeleft:....aye right
a year ago it was Kessler that would stop Calzaghe, then up till a few months ago he was ducking Pavlik....Zzzzz its rubbish.
Calzaghe would destroy Chad Dawson.
The only person who can beat him is Bernard Hopkins, and I think he did in the first fight.
Maybe Hopkins but that's about it. Dawson narrowly beat Johnson, is he not going to give him a rematch?
Whats the point of a rematch if Dawson can fight Joe Calzaghe next? Calzaghe is at the point where he's nearing retirement, Dawson should pursue this opportunity at all cost. And if he beats Calzaghe, than he should give Johnson a rematch.
Glen Johnson vs. Joe Calzaghe has classic written all over it. But I see Joe adjusting to Glen. B-Hop is probly the only 1 man that has the better chance to beat Calzaghe. Though I see it being the same outcome.
There is no money or a big public interest in that fight. The only reason Dawson is being brought up is because there is literally no one else for Calzaghe to fight. If Dawson struggled with Johnson, imagine what Joe will do to him. It'll be Calzaghe-Lacy all over again.
Dawson isn't Lacy, Dawson is WAY more skilled than Lacy. There were many opportunities for Joe to beat Calzaghe, it's just he wasn't active enough because he's past his prime. If Calzaghe were to face Dawson, not only is he facing someone younger, but just as skilled, and just as active as Jones in his prime (okay he's not that good, but you get the idea). Lets not forget his handspeed is just as fast as Calzaghe's.
There is no money or a big public interest in that fight. The only reason Dawson is being brought up is because there is literally no one else for Calzaghe to fight. If Dawson struggled with Johnson, imagine what Joe will do to him. It'll be Calzaghe-Lacy all over again.
we're talking about the best fight to be made and the last step in cementing a legacy not finances. there would interest in any calzaghe fight so that doesnt fly. and if its lacy again what other way to retire in wales?
I did not mean you personally i meant generally ppl on this board. you never praised his kessler win though? if he would embarrass him why not do it in wales as farewell then?
There is no money or a big public interest in that fight. The only reason Dawson is being brought up is because there is literally no one else for Calzaghe to fight. If Dawson struggled with Johnson, imagine what Joe will do to him. It'll be Calzaghe-Lacy all over again.
For one, I said nothing about Kessler. Dawson got a gift decision against Johnson, and Calzaghe would absolutely embarass him.
I did not mean you personally i meant generally ppl on this board. you never praised his kessler win though? if he would embarrass him why not do it in wales as farewell then?
Who should he fight next?
He is not going to retire.
No idea, Paul Williams is the only guy who would KO Joe in 1...:p
:lol1:
Seriously I dont see anyone beating Joe, it would need to be a guy with serious KO power.
he should have lost to hopkins and was almost ko'd against jones and tarver doesnt even have a chance? get real and the answer is ernest "too slick" johnson.
He clearly beat a game Hopkins. He was not even close to being KO'd against Jones... did you watch the fight? Tarver is a has been, and Dawson got a gift against a 40 year old Glen Johnson. I can't even believe this is being debated.
he should have lost to hopkins and was almost ko'd against jones and tarver doesnt even have a chance? get real and the answer is ernest "too slick" johnson.
You are so stupid,i think you most be a retard
why do some of the ppl that hype his kessler win as the best, want to downplay a potential matchup with dawson?
For one, I said nothing about Kessler. Dawson got a gift decision against Johnson, and Calzaghe would absolutely embarass him.
One of the dumbest statements I may have heard on the history of this board.
While I wish Calzaghe would not retire, there really is no one else for him to fight. If he fights Johnson or Tarver he gets the same "oh you beat someone who was past their prime" BS, and if he beats Dawson he gets the "oh you beat a young guy who beat a 40 year old Glen Johnson." Calzaghe has nothing left to prove, he is an all time great and really impressed me tonight. There is really no one out there who can beat him right now. Time to hang them up and call it day while on top.
why do some of the ppl that hype his kessler win as the best, want to downplay a potential matchup with dawson?
he should have lost to hopkins and was almost ko'd against jones and tarver doesnt even have a chance? get real and the answer is ernest "too slick" johnson.
Chad Dawson, Glen Johnson, and Antonio Tarver can beat Calzaghe.
One of the dumbest statements I may have heard on the history of this board.
While I wish Calzaghe would not retire, there really is no one else for him to fight. If he fights Johnson or Tarver he gets the same "oh you beat someone who was past their prime" BS, and if he beats Dawson he gets the "oh you beat a young guy who beat a couple 40 year old has-beens."
Calzaghe has nothing left to prove, he is an all time great and really impressed me tonight. There is really no one out there who can beat him right now. Time to hang them up and call it day while on top.