Hopkin's was seen as the better fighter before the fight, and is still the better fighter after. I dont think anyone (besides a few Pavlik fanatics) claiming that Pav was a better fighter than Bhop. Many people thought Hopkins would lose due to his age, and lackluster performance against Calzaghe. Basically, the majority felt that Pavlik would just outwork Hopkins. Wasnt the case though!
Ermm. Bernard Hopkins is an ATG, so he is by far.
I'm sorry, but I don't see how anyone with a brain cell can vote Pavlik..
Thats the problem, the two people who have voted seriously don't have any. :)
Pavlik will literally walk through Hopkins if they ever fight.
Oh. Yeah. Right. This isn't last week.
(Raises hand in thinking Pavlik would stop B-Hop)
I was wrong on this one. BIG TIME.
i doubt it.
its hopkins.
then pavlik...WAY WAY WAY BEHIND hopkins...
and paul williams is WAY WAY WAY behind pavlik.
Your sarcasm meter must be broken......
Of course. And that answer is....
PWill.....:D
i doubt it.
its hopkins.
then pavlik...WAY WAY WAY BEHIND hopkins...
and paul williams is WAY WAY WAY behind pavlik.
What do you mean? There is no point in even asking this question. If anyone has to think about it, then they're already wrong. B-Hop will always be the better fighter, no doubt. He is the better fighter now and will be remembered as the better fighter in a hundred years, guaranteed. Of course Hopkins is better. It wasn't even much of a question before the fight, other than "Is Hopkins shot now?", which of course he wasn't.