:boxing:Calzaghe Vs Pavlik:boxing:
:boxing:Do you think this fight will hapen? And do you think this fight if it was to happen would bringing one of the the biggest pay days?:boxing:
The Clazaghe v Pavlik issue has been pretty overdone already and even if they do fight it won't be for a fair while. Right now Calzaghe takes it no problem, but in a year or so it could be a different story. To all the people saying that Pavlik would whoop him, please explain to me how Pavlik is different to Kessler and why he would fair better against Calzaghe.
And as usual you go into you political rhetoric and dont address one single point made
Taking a leaf out of my book there, that's ironically exactly what I said to you recently I'm pretty sure.
Joe has beaten two in prime WCs the rest were way gone , and Hattons win over Castillo was a hype market sell , both points are facts and easily proven .
They faced other fighters in and around their prime, and again no ones said every single one was great. A win over Castillo was not bad, where's your solid proof it was solely marketing then? Aren't most fights to varying degrees a matter of marketing the fighter and a lot of personal interpretation goes into deciding how much on different fighters? Yes. You sir apply ridiculous levels of criticism and dismissive attitude to Britains two top fighters whom are champions and #1 across 3 weight divisions. You don't get there for nothing, which is kinda what your making out, so your underlining why your biased and lack credit.
The other point worth mentioning is I am one of the least biased posters to ever post here , that one is easy to prove also , as far as you trying to play the Brit bash card like you always do that sir is a case of Brits like yourself being super paranoid about any criticism even when its true , the only thing I have against some Brit posters is they have blinkers on concerning British fighters .
See above. Least biased poster, are you for real. You yourself has shown otherwise along with others several times. So not only are you saying Calzaghe and Hatton are pretty much hype jobs despite being #1 across 3 weight divisions, your claiming to be the least biased poster out of all of boxing scenes thousands of members even in the past too? Everyone else is more biased than RodBarker, all hail.
You then go on about not having problems with British when you clearly do, there's pages of you arguing with Clegg and others throwing every low blow insult upon the British and you weren't kidding. Your a lame hater reluctant you give 1 inch in your narrow minded views coupled with an I'm right and best attitude. Then you amazingly go onto shock horror, criticise quite broadly the British, funny that.
Your insulting, arrogant, biased, narrow minded, contradictory, big headed, un compromising and contradictory.
How many WCs has Joe fought or beat in their prime , its two Kessler and Lacy and Lacy is and was a hype job , you guys really get off on beating old washed up name fighters , we do the same in Aus as you do in England import shot names to sell to a gullible public , it amazes me that in a world boxing forum that you guys cant see through the marketing rort , the best recent example was Hatton and Castillo , the joke was it had you guys in raptures .
Not overly surprising you criticise and try to undermine two of Britains best fighters when you've shown you have issues with liking the British. You've ranted about the English, SAD syndrome and all kinds of shit before. Your broad dislike and largely invented portrayal of the British and 2 of it's best fighters are a complete joke.
How can you say Hatton or Calzaghe are hype jobs which is essentially what your saying in saying their well marketed, it warrants no credit. Calzaghe is undisputed #1 at SMW and LHW, and p4p #2. In the world. Hatton is #1 in his division and had many good wins. I'm not saying their flawless of have top resumes. But whats new loads of people don't. Does Pavlik? Funny, you seem to pay him more respect. The extent you go to really shows you up to be bias and leaves you deserving little credit.
I'll happily take a bet with you on Calzaghe if he faces Pavlik. More than happily. Saying Enzo and Joe are scared of Pavlik since Gary lost is a joke. You think Joe hadn't watched Pavlik before, expected Gary to win? Simple, cynical, and wishful thinking. And by the way, most ppl all over, inside and outside of boxing favour Calzaghe winning.
Both Jack and Kelly know he will kick Joes butt thats why they want it , I agree it probably wont happen but it wont be Kelly pulling out it will be Joe like he has already done once after calling Kelly out , Enzo shit after seeing Kelly up close , like Jack said Enzo wants no part of his monster , if Kelly is really impressive beating Bhop Joe wont fight him thats my gut feeling as Joe has been a cherry picker his whole career he aint gunna risk it all now against a young hungry lion that punches like a mule .
If you say so. Guess we'll have to wait and see.
Joe's done a lot on paper but in reality he would lose to any Prime HoF fighter judging by his performance vs 43 year old Hopkins and the fact that his record was padded in Wales against nobodies.So you judge him aganst one fight?? Nobody can look good against a guy that dont wanna make a fight of it! And how you can say hes fought nobodys is behond me!?
How many world champs has Calzaghe fought when defending his title 20+ times??? How many Titles did he take???
That is what he should be judged by !
For the record i am not a huge fan of Calzaghes style and would much prefer to watch a prime RJJ,Nigel Benn,Pavlic etc etc but you gotta give calzaghe his Props what hes done hes done well !
If you cant respect this and feel hes not achieved nothing then your opinion is dubious IMO !
Can anybody understand what this poor bastard is writing????
Please try and speak in the Queens English for fuck sake cause i cant understand a fucking word your saying mate!
Joe's done a lot on paper but in reality he would lose to any Prime HoF fighter judging by his performance vs 43 year old Hopkins and the fact that his record was padded in Wales against nobodies.
what r u talkin bout he did that 2 da brits, da brits cant fight plus he lost 2 Hopkins, & dont try 2 tell me different cuz i saw da fight, & they gave da fight 2 joke cal-slappy cuz B-Hop said he wouldnt lose 2 a white boy, right there they gave joe da fight....& ask ur self if joke-cal-slappy is a legend, FOOL!
I didnt know kids were allowed on this forum.
what r u talkin bout he did that 2 da brits, da brits cant fight plus he lost 2 Hopkins, & dont try 2 tell me different cuz i saw da fight, & they gave da fight 2 joke cal-slappy cuz B-Hop said he wouldnt lose 2 a white boy, right there they gave joe da fight....& ask ur self if joke-cal-slappy is a legend, FOOL!
Can anybody understand what this poor bastard is writing????
Please try and speak in the Queens English for fuck sake cause i cant understand a fucking word your saying mate!
Except Pavlik. In the fight that is.
As much as it does make sense and those things are true and making it morel likely, still doesn't mean it will happen though. Wouldn't be the first big fight not to come off, far from it. There's been loads the last couple of years. People will kick up a stink on Calzaghe for not fighting Pavlik, but don't talk about Osca not wanting Marg after first saying he would, and countless of other such scenario's.
I'm not sure I can see a sensible reason for Pavlik to want to fight Calzaghe. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it never happens.
If you think that defeating 8 former world champions and making 20+ title defenses as not "Showin Nutin" then your a fool!
what r u talkin bout he did that 2 da brits, da brits cant fight plus he lost 2 Hopkins, & dont try 2 tell me different cuz i saw da fight, & they gave da fight 2 joke cal-slappy cuz B-Hop said he wouldnt lose 2 a white boy, right there they gave joe da fight....& ask ur self if joke-cal-slappy is a legend, FOOL!
lol...i rather go 4 da legends that proved themselves already, joke-cal-slappy has shown nuthin...
If you think that defeating 8 former world champions and making 20+ title defenses as not "Showin Nutin" then your a fool!
funny as fuck if the two old timers win!:boxing:
But they wont!
But it would be funny....lol
lol...i rather go 4 da legends that proved themselves already, joke-cal-slappy has shown nuthin...
Yeah it will probably happen. Calzaghe figting Jones and Pavlik fighting Hopkins only serves to make the fight even bigger.
Calzaghe has only had one fight in the US and it wasnt an impressive performance so if he ups it against Jones, his stock will rise.
Pavlik is quite well known and a potential superstar but has quite fullfilled it yet. Beating and possibly KOing Hopkins will elevate him.
Fight becomes much bigger, both guys get paid more.
Joe gets to puncture another American hypejob.
Everyone wins.
Except Pavlik. In the fight that is.
As much as it does make sense and those things are true and making it morel likely, still doesn't mean it will happen though. Wouldn't be the first big fight not to come off, far from it. There's been loads the last couple of years. People will kick up a stink on Calzaghe for not fighting Pavlik, but don't talk about Osca not wanting Marg after first saying he would, and countless of other such scenario's.
Yeah it will probably happen. Calzaghe figting Jones and Pavlik fighting Hopkins only serves to make the fight even bigger.
Calzaghe has only had one fight in the US and it wasnt an impressive performance so if he ups it against Jones, his stock will rise.
Pavlik is quite well known and a potential superstar but has quite fullfilled it yet. Beating and possibly KOing Hopkins will elevate him.
Fight becomes much bigger, both guys get paid more.
Joe gets to puncture another American hypejob.
Everyone wins.