Do u guys think any current fighter will end up undefeated? I'm talking fighting every big fighter. Floyd was undefeated but ran from Williams,Tony and Cotto so he doesn't count. Marciano was undefeated and fought everyone that was there for him even tough people say he didn't fight in the best era. So you guys see any fighter beating everyone without ducking anyone?
p.s. If Joe beats Roy and Pavlik he would probably be the only one
Is this anthony? He's got a hard time against that mexican toughie jauregui yesterday but it was a good win and an experience necessary to propell him to championship.
Anothony hasn't been impressive recently. It seems that his power may have been a little overrated and he is not stepping too far up in competition. I think that Lamont will be the better fighter overall. He just has more and is just a better fighter. He also punches harder IMO.
one of the peterson brothersIs this anthony? He's got a hard time against that mexican toughie jauregui yesterday but it was a good win and an experience necessary to propell him to championship.
personally i dont won't to see anyone undefeated unless they have beat all competiton within their limits like the battles of Hagler Leonard Hearns Duran all champs and all will be talked about still in the next 50 years all with some losses but to answer the question No i don't think anyone will remain undefeated
Right now I'd say Calzaghe and Pavlik have the best chance going Undefeated. Mostly joe cause hes' only has a fight or two left in him. I think he beats roy pretty easy like everybodys predicting, only Pavlik is the one he should worry about, maybe Dawson. Going undefeated is a hard thing to do. This is boxing you know. Pretty much everybody loses sometimes.
Oh and Darkstar, there are more Dawson fights that you could download. I actually have a thread in the video trading section with some of his fights with Ian Garder and Eric Harding. I will try to get more. They are not my fights of course, but different people got them for me. Here is the link.
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=165248
I was watching the Dawson vs Adamek fight again and Dawson looked so great and slick, he was just doing everything right. He obviously regressed against Glen Johnson, but I think of that as more of growing pains for Chad. We have yet to see the best of Chad Dawson and against Tarver were going to see the best from him.
Definitely agree. Dawson needs to pick up his defense when facing the big punchers though to avoid putting himself at risk. I was actually watching Dawson against Johnson and shockingly, Mustaffa Muhammed was telling him to do the all of the right things but he simply wouldn't listen becuase he let his ego get the best of him. Eddie told him go to the body early and don't trade with him but Dawson didn't listen. Let us give Chad time to adjust to the new trainer, an he should be fine.
Dawson does better than Tarver in techincal boxing matches. This fight should some what resemble the Adamek fight. Not the Adamek has a style comparable to Tarver but neither of them are pressure fighters and Dawson outclasses them on the outside IMO.
Maybe Joe Calzaghe,
Ivan Caldero (he hasn't duck anyone)
Chris Jonh (he 's the most protected fighter)
Zsolt Erdei (if he's still ducking decent competition)
Chris John is protected but he did beat Marquez..I'm not sure if Marquez underestimated him though.
Maybe Joe Calzaghe,
Ivan Caldero (he hasn't duck anyone)
Chris Jonh (he 's the most protected fighter)
Zsolt Erdei (if he's still ducking decent competition)
Pavlik is very beatable, despite being an A level fighter. I think Calzaghe and Dawson has the best chance of beating him, but their fighting as light heavyweights and Pavlik wants to fight Abraham next.
Calzaghe would never beat Pavlik, I haven't watched enough of Dawson but I know Calzaghe would never beat Pavlik. Pavlik has to smooth of a right hand, has to much power - a height advantage and his defense has improved greatly.
Calzaghe likes to come forward he would get banged up.
Chad Dawson. I really don't want to seem like a fan boy but he is just too good right now and i can't see anyone around beating him, even Calzaghe. If he picks up his defense and avoid being caught with anything big, then the sky would be the limit. He just has so much in his arsenal and is very multi dimensional.
I was watching the Dawson vs Adamek fight again and Dawson looked so smooth and slick, he was just doing everything right. He obviously regressed against Glen Johnson, but I think of that as more of growing pains for Chad. We have yet to see the best of Chad Dawson and against Tarver were going to see the best from him.
I'd say Pavlik, there is nobody good enough out there to beat him. Calzaghe will duck him to because he doesn't have a chance in hell.
Pavlik is very beatable, despite being an A level fighter. I think Calzaghe and Dawson has the best chance of beating him, but their fighting as light heavyweights and Pavlik wants to fight Abraham next.
If Oscar ended with a 0 fighting the opposition he did u guys think it still wouldn't of made a diffrence? It's not a huge deal cause we never see it. A fighter who would end up with a 0 and fighting great competition would be crazy
Agreed, pavlik doesnt have the best opposition, but he could quite easily lose to BHop, and even if he wins that he could end up in a ring with calzaghe which would very likely destroy his 0. I think we're all agreed that a 0 doesnt mean that much anyway though. . .
IMO, it doesn't matter if they retire undefeated or not. The likes of Pacman and DLH speak volumes about how much the "0" really means in boxing. If I had to choose one and I will certainly be biast, I'd say Pavlik will get it done. JC is in Mayweathers boat according to your outline and doesn't qualify.
Being undefeated would be insane. It may not matter a whole lot because the greatest ever even lost. But imagine if a fighter like Mayweather fighting Cotto, Mosley, Williams, Berto and Margarito and beat all of them. That 0 would of been insane
Pavlik has a chance if he played it smart and sometime safe. He's not in a stacked division, and he could clean it up and still get respect for doing that.
If he took the right fights later in his career, he could retire undefeated.
Chad Dawson. I really don't want to seem like a fan boy but he is just too good right now and i can't see anyone around beating him, even Calzaghe. If he picks up his defense and avoid being caught with anything big, then the sky would be the limit. He just has so much in his arsenal and is very multi dimensional.
IMO, it doesn't matter if they retire undefeated or not. The likes of Pacman and DLH speak volumes about how much the "0" really means in boxing. If I had to choose one and I will certainly be biast, I'd say Pavlik will get it done. JC is in Mayweathers boat according to your outline and doesn't qualify.