Manny has been #1 2 years in my book.

I wasn;t trying to diss you or anything. I agree Pacman should've been number 1 for the past 2 years, but I don't agree with your logic that Diaz is better than Judah. Ok, thats fine, I see both points but Dios is just acting like a punk about it. All good bud.

You find Stash cut up? he is being a wise ass. I am 15 lbs lighter from that pic and I am pretty cut, now anyways.

I can see that, but I had no problem with Mayweather being #1 until recently before he retired. With that said, Pacquiao's resume is much better.

You are unbelievably tough. You scare us all. Its truth... I would like to see the scared look on your face after I slap the shit out of you...punk I thrive on that. All the "tough" guys, I slap them right in front of their bitches and homies and whatever and watch the fear FEAR come over their faces. Its what I do...

Right, but the forum going crazy for David Diaz is a-ok....:rolleyes: Floyd has faced better competition than Manny. Just get over it. I agree Diaz is nothing to write home about but I stand firm on Manny with the tougher competition. I do however think PBF wins over PAC tommorow if it happened. As Floyd would be a monster at 136 and Manny pushing it a touch.

Hatton is an overrated little munchin. His claim was beating a washed up Tzu, thats it. Right, but the forum going crazy for David Diaz is a-ok....:rolleyes: Floyd has faced better competition than Manny. Just get over it.

You forgot Hatton, dumbass. And Judah would destroy Diaz in the pro's. And Manny lost to EM before beating him (when he was coming off a loss against Zahir Raheem.) Hatton is an overrated little munchin. His claim was beating a washed up Tzu, thats it.

Erik Morales was a dead man when he fought Pak that third time. Are you even serious? your still missing my point. Diaz beat Judah once so it is my opinion that until PROVEM otherwise Diaz is the better fighter. As far as that community college kid shit goes you are just a little punk bitch Floyd nuthugger... I would slap the shit out of you if I saw your little punk ass like I do the rest of the little wannabe's that come into the gym.

Floyd competition compared to manny in the last 2 years. Manny JMM, marco B and Erik Morales Floyd Gotti, Judah, Baldomir and Oscar Judah lost to David Diaz who Manny raped. Nuff said You forgot Hatton, dumbass. And Judah would destroy Diaz in the pro's. And Manny lost to EM before beating him (when he was coming off a loss against Zahir Raheem.)

Too bad your book doesnt mean shit..... You must be a little teenage Floyd nutsacker...

When the hell did Zab Judah fight David Diaz? Ams? lol. Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

At the end of '06, I thought Pac desereved to be the man when he destroyed EM again while PBF was stinkin up the joint against Baldomir. But he had a stale '07 while PBF beat DLH and KO'd Hatton, so PBF rightfully edged him for the top spot. But wit PBF refusin to face his top challenger and plannin on fightin DLH again while Pac won a close war wit Dinamita then movin up to grab his next belt makes Pac #1, whether or not PBF was still active. winning the rematch against DLH is a way better victory than David Diaz. Also KTFO Hatton is a better victory than edging JMM in a close fight.

At the end of '06, I thought Pac desereved to be the man when he destroyed EM again while PBF was stinkin up the joint against Baldomir. But he had a stale '07 while PBF beat DLH and KO'd Hatton, so PBF rightfully edged him for the top spot. But wit PBF refusin to face his top challenger and plannin on fightin DLH again while Pac won a close war wit Dinamita then movin up to grab his next belt makes Pac #1, whether or not PBF was still active.

Joe Calzaghe beat Chris Byrd in the amateurs in 1992. I think it's safe to say if they would've fought 10 years later, Byrd would've made Joe his b!tch.

augie sanchez beat Floyd Mayweather twice in the amateurs but it safe to say if the fought at pro level Mayweather would destroy him. You cannot use an amateur fight has a reference to a pro fight...Thats just my opinion anyway. your opinion is the correct one

augie sanchez beat Floyd Mayweather twice in the amateurs but it safe to say if the fought at pro level Mayweather would destroy him. You cannot use an amateur fight has a reference to a pro fight...Thats just my opinion anyway.

Agreed. I am glad 2 people can have an intelligent discussion on here still. I think that fight would be tremendous. If the fight happened 10 times I see results like this: Floyd by decision 5 times PAC by ko twice Floyd by twice Pac by decision once. I would favour Floyd nine times out of ten to be honest, even P4P and disregarding natural size. He's such a technician that I think he'd lock Pacman out strategically. Look at how effective Marquez could be simply using the counter right. I would like pacman to beat him though, I mean, what an entertaining fighter!

I see what you're saying, and really with the standard of opposition he made his name fighting, Pacqiao realy deserves the #1 spot. However, I do think Floyd would beat him, I've posted lots of times he can do everything Manny can do at the lower weights and can do a lot more defensively. It'd be a fantastic fight at 135/140 though. Agreed. I am glad 2 people can have an intelligent discussion on here still. I think that fight would be tremendous. If the fight happened 10 times I see results like this: Floyd by decision 5 times PAC by ko twice Floyd by twice Pac by decision once.

Not sure, this is kind of like apples to oranges but Manny lasy night seemed as fast as ever. I just think if 2 guys have never fought you have to look at the competition. Floyd looks great against sub par guys but even Judah was hitting him good. I see what you're saying, and really with the standard of opposition he made his name fighting, Pacqiao realy deserves the #1 spot. However, I do think Floyd would beat him, I've posted lots of times he can do everything Manny can do at the lower weights and can do a lot more defensively. It'd be a fantastic fight at 135/140 though.

I wanted YOU to answer the question. to say ""i'm counting amateurs". I asked you the question of "WHEN". But now that you have admitted that it doesn't support any point you were making, you have clowned yourself. Again. Your an idiot buddy. Here is a question when comparing 2 guys; is it easier to compare who the better fighter if they never fought or fought in the amateurs as opposed to NEVER. Diaz beat Judah in the AMS. He still beat him OK, so go on and tell me that Judah is a better fighter than Diaz and argue my point, you will lose soley on the fact that they fought once ansd Judah lost. My answer is YES it makes a difference if they fought in the Amateurs. As much as the Pro's no but it does make a world of difference.