Pacman sure loves beating the shit outta those Mexicans.
Actually, he doesn't. He has class, unlike you. He fights to please all fans, including Mexican fans. Dipshit.
Well generally speaking, in my experience only, Mexican fight fans don't count American born Mexicans as "true" Mexicans. This is why Mexican fans hated Oscar De La Hoya for so long. Being that Diaz is not only American, but also only half Mexican, I doubt many of them cared about him in the first place.
The few Mexican fans who did want to see him win, only did so because they wanted to see Manny lose. But now that Manny won, I doubt you'll hear much from them.
UMMMMM are you mexican????? Many full blood mexicans support mexican americans!! We are all still linked and still come from the same nationality, same heritage, same work ethic, etc....Just because you weren't born here doesn't mean your not a true mexican. Most likely you parents were born in mexico and came here like myself but you are still raised with all the mexican traits just out of bad poverty like you would have in mexico. I was rooting for diaz but not out of hate for paquiao but becuase he is mexican. Oscar de la hoya is a white washed, greedy closet white guy that tries to proclaim himself as this mexican warrior, tough guy out of "east L.A" but as you can see he didn't grow up too rough it would show trust me! No hardcore mexican fan likes DLH he is loved by girls, media, and casual america that dont really follow the sport too intenstly. Hats off to diaz for the effort he put in the ring and the praise he gave paquiao after the fight.
Pacman was a runner????LOL, funny, last time I saw DD's face it was all jacked up... Last time I saw compubox pac threw 100 punches around or something. How many did david throw? He was too busy covering up instead of trading with Pac thats why.... Too afraid to take risks??? Nah man Pac wasnt runnin. I have a feeling when you watch a fight you only see the whats happening too and what the Mexican or the dude you are going for is doing. Hence your wierd scoring.. If thats the way you look at it than you can say Marquez is a runner but its all good cuz hes mexican.
You didn't see the fight then stop talking shit.
I gave Hatton rounds in his fight against Mayweather.
I didn't even give Diaz a round from what i remember before i fell asleep.
You don't understand my boxing views and i've seen more boxing matchs then you have. You can't pick my brain.
Next time there is a fight, i'll let you know and we'll both score the fight and give our score cards after wards and see who which rounds we scored. Deal?
Didn't I already tell you? I don't score fights, but I can see when a fighter isn't landing punches, which doesn't seem to be your primary concern in most fights according to some of your scorecards.
Hopkins only wins over Tarver by one point because of the knockdown right? Tarver won a bunch of rounds because he was grabbed too many times by Hopkins was pretty much the explanation you gave me.
I didn't see it, nor do I score fights, but I didn't have to see it criticize what you said. I do know that runners don't dominate every round and score the KO though.
You said it was annoying any time he would step back after landing a punch, which means... getting out of the of a counter shot.
Really, there are only a couple of guys who fight the way that you want... Arce, Margarito, Glen Johnson... but there are other ways to win a fight than just standing in front of someone, slugging and seeing who dies first. Backing away is an effective strategy if it stops your opponent from landing IF you are landing punches while doing so.
Case in point... Tarver-Johnson I (or both of them for that matter)... Tarver was constantly backing up, letting Johnson come forward, but avoiding Johnson's punishment all while landing bombs.
I would wager that you scored both fights for Johnson though. I just think you have a very shallow view of how to score fights, which is fine I guess, but it is why your scorecard is so wildly different than the official scorecards so often. That's all I'm saying.
You didn't see the fight then stop talking shit.
I gave Hatton rounds in his fight against Mayweather.
I didn't even give Diaz a round from what i remember before i fell asleep.
You don't understand my boxing views and i've seen more boxing matchs then you have. You can't pick my brain.
Next time there is a fight, i'll let you know and we'll both score the fight and give our score cards after wards and see who which rounds we scored. Deal?
If Pacquiao wants to act like he is made of steel and punch himself and disrespect the opponet in front of him, then get the balls to stand with him and go toe to toe. What Pacquiao was doing is repetitive, no fucking rythem or flow just seemed scared or convince himself that he could take Diaz punch. You know how Mayorga talks shit out and inside the ring and then ask you to punch him. Well Pacquiao talks shit inside the ring but then backs away.
How many rounds did you give to Diaz?
your stupidity is way overboard. i wonder how you became a boxing aficionado w/ your kind of views.
you guys are fucken stupid. Pac man kicked ass. Although he did lose twice to Marquez. Im the biggest self hating Mexican on the face of the earth and I know pac man beat the fuck out of Diaz. He said it himself. Lets see pacs take on Valero next!
If Pacquiao wants to act like he is made of steel and punch himself and disrespect the opponet in front of him, then get the balls to stand with him and go toe to toe. What Pacquiao was doing is repetitive, no fucking rythem or flow just seemed scared or convince himself that he could take Diaz punch. You know how Mayorga talks shit out and inside the ring and then ask you to punch him. Well Pacquiao talks shit inside the ring but then backs away.
How many rounds did you give to Diaz?
I didn't see it, nor do I score fights, but I didn't have to see it criticize what you said. I do know that runners don't dominate every round and score the KO though.
You said it was annoying any time he would step back after landing a punch, which means... getting out of the of a counter shot.
Really, there are only a couple of guys who fight the way that you want... Arce, Margarito, Glen Johnson... but there are other ways to win a fight than just standing in front of someone, slugging and seeing who dies first. Backing away is an effective strategy if it stops your opponent from landing IF you are landing punches while doing so.
Case in point... Tarver-Johnson I (or both of them for that matter)... Tarver was constantly backing up, letting Johnson come forward, but avoiding Johnson's punishment all while landing bombs.
I would wager that you scored both fights for Johnson though. I just think you have a very shallow view of how to score fights, which is fine I guess, but it is why your scorecard is so wildly different than the official scorecards so often. That's all I'm saying.
You really need a new view on boxing. I mean, really, you take away from any victory that is not a 100% toe-to-toe battle. You really think it is a flaw for someone to step back even one step in order to not get crushed by a huge punch.
That is why you scored Chavez a draw against Whitaker.
That is why you scored Ramirez over Whitaker.
That is why you gave Hatton 5 rounds against Mayweather.
You need to understand that walking forward is not the object of the sport. Landing punches is the object of the sport. If Hatton was throwing a bunch while Mayweather was backing up, but Mayweather was landing the hard shots off of his back foot, there is NO reason to score the round for Hatton.
God, I can't believe someone said that Pacquiao was fighting too much like a coward for their taste. What the hell?
If Pacquiao wants to act like he is made of steel and punch himself and disrespect the opponet in front of him, then get the balls to stand with him and go toe to toe. What Pacquiao was doing is repetitive, no fucking rythem or flow just seemed scared or convince himself that he could take Diaz punch. You know how Mayorga talks shit out and inside the ring and then ask you to punch him. Well Pacquiao talks shit inside the ring but then backs away.
How many rounds did you give to Diaz?
Props to Pacquiao for winning as we knew he was. Sure i betted and rooted for Diaz.
I was going to make a thread called "Pacquiao the new runner" but decdied not too.
What i mean by runner is Pacquiao was the stronger and harder hitter yet, every single time(or it looked like) that Diaz punched Pacquiao he back away. This type of shit was gettting annoying . Like he was afraid to get hit. And the real reason i even cared is because he slaps his face and belly, lifts up his arms, then runs away or backs away, shits funny as hell. He took that shit from Morales except Morales had the balls to then go straight after his opponet where as Pacquiao runs from them after he taunts them to show that he can take a hit but he backs away, shit funny. And i don't even know if Diaz did any better or Pacquiao did any worse i feel asleep sometime around the 5-7 round. Credit to Diaz who took a beating but damn, Pacquiao can't even finish a guy or stand with his opponet toe to toe even though he is winning big, reminds me of Floyd.
To the pinoys talking shit, you're guy left Soto at 130 and never fought him. That mean he didn't beat all the #1 Mexcian boxers so fuck off. And Marquez beat him twice. Juan Diaz would still beat Pacquiao and the other Diaz would give Pacquiao nightmares as he is a good boxer with power.
You really need a new view on boxing. I mean, really, you take away from any victory that is not a 100% toe-to-toe battle. You really think it is a flaw for someone to step back even one step in order to not get crushed by a huge punch.
That is why you scored Chavez a draw against Whitaker.
That is why you scored Ramirez over Whitaker.
That is why you gave Hatton 5 rounds against Mayweather.
You need to understand that walking forward is not the object of the sport. Landing punches is the object of the sport. If Hatton was throwing a bunch while Mayweather was backing up, but Mayweather was landing the hard shots off of his back foot, there is NO reason to score the round for Hatton.
God, I can't believe someone said that Pacquiao was fighting too much like a coward for their taste. What the hell?
Props to Pacquiao for winning as we knew he was. Sure i betted and rooted for Diaz.
I was going to make a thread called "Pacquiao the new runner" but decdied not too.
What i mean by runner is Pacquiao was the stronger and harder hitter yet, every single time(or it looked like) that Diaz punched Pacquiao he back away. This type of shit was gettting annoying . Like he was afraid to get hit. And the real reason i even cared is because he slaps his face and belly, lifts up his arms, then runs away or backs away, shits funny as hell. He took that shit from Morales except Morales had the balls to then go straight after his opponet where as Pacquiao runs from them after he taunts them to show that he can take a hit but he backs away, shit funny. And i don't even know if Diaz did any better or Pacquiao did any worse i feel asleep sometime around the 5-7 round. Credit to Diaz who took a beating but damn, Pacquiao can't even finish a guy or stand with his opponet toe to toe even though he is winning big, reminds me of Floyd.
To the pinoys talking shit, you're guy left Soto at 130 and never fought him. That mean he didn't beat all the #1 Mexcian boxers so fuck off. And Marquez beat him twice. Juan Diaz would still beat Pacquiao and the other Diaz would give Pacquiao nightmares as he is a good boxer with power.
Props to Pacquiao for winning as we knew he was. Sure i betted and rooted for Diaz.
I was going to make a thread called "Pacquiao the new runner" but decdied not too.
What i mean by runner is Pacquiao was the stronger and harder hitter yet, every single time(or it looked like) that Diaz punched Pacquiao he back away. This type of shit was gettting annoying . Like he was afraid to get hit. And the real reason i even cared is because he slaps his face and belly, lifts up his arms, then runs away or backs away, shits funny as hell. He took that shit from Morales except Morales had the balls to then go straight after his opponet where as Pacquiao runs from them after he taunts them to show that he can take a hit but he backs away, shit funny. And i don't even know if Diaz did any better or Pacquiao did any worse i feel asleep sometime around the 5-7 round. Credit to Diaz who took a beating but damn, Pacquiao can't even finish a guy or stand with his opponet toe to toe even though he is winning big, reminds me of Floyd.
To the pinoys talking shit, you're guy left Soto at 130 and never fought him. That mean he didn't beat all the #1 Mexcian boxers so fuck off. And Marquez beat him twice. Juan Diaz would still beat Pacquiao and the other Diaz would give Pacquiao nightmares as he is a good boxer with power.
Hate to burst the bubble but Diaz is American, born in America, fought for the U.S. in the 96 Olympics. He's only half Mexican, that's why mexican fans have disowned him or never liked him in the first place.
Plus Marquez beat him twice
That's pretty fuckin racist. Not saying you are, but that mentality.
Not me, I'm Irish/German, I like everybody, lol. I'm just saying, that in my own personal experience, American born Mexicans are never viewed as "real Mexicans" by Mexican born Mexicans.
If you are born in the states, forget about being accepted as one of Mexico's own.
No matter what u do, u will always be viewed as a faux mexican and if u speak only English, that even worse.
The funny thing about all this is ,that people that are recent arrivals shit on US born mexicans and call them names and call them out for accented spanish. Then, they have kids here, so i guess they have to shit on their own children, thats how absurd and sad it all is.