Best Fighter Never To Win The World Title?

Michael Watson Herol Graham David Tua Sam Langford Charles Burley Razor Ruddock Earnie Shavers Jimmy Young Ike Ibeabuchi Andrew Golota Not bad, not bad at all. Not that sure about Golota, but Ibeabuchi most definitely would have been champ if he wouldn't have gone to prison, and Tua might have been champ if not for Ike. Shavers and Young happened to be in some pretty tough eras, or they might have, esp Shavers.

Gotta be Sam Langford.

Ross Purity anyone.

Bernard "Superbad" Mays

Howard Davis Jr.

For me its Herol 'the bomber' Graham. he should have gotten the decision against mccallum. he was better than benn n eubank imo who were titlist at the time not to metion the fact that Vincenzo Nardiello & Suagr Boy Malinga were World Champions around the same sort of era Eubank wanted no part of Herol Graham or Mike McCallum

Sam Langford and Charles Burley. Herol Graham was not better than Benn or Eubank, he kept his hands far two low and stuck his chin out there. He didn't deserve a title show because he lost to Jackson and Jackson was the more deserving fighter. That fight was for the vacant title not a title shot if im correct. Im not too sure Eubank would have beat Graham either, i just fail to see how Chris would do enough to pick up the rounds in this one. He would have a good chance to ko him if he found the big right hand though. Problem is that many fighters survived the full 12 with Eubank that had an ounce of the talent that Herol had.

no doubt it has to be David Tua.

For me its Herol 'the bomber' Graham. he should have gotten the decision against mccallum. he was better than benn n eubank imo who were titlist at the timeThe bomber was top quality but had a fragile chin,you could'nt compare him to either Chris or Nigel because of the difference in their styles,he had great hand speed and upper body movement but he was down a level to them lads when it came to really fighting............look at there records as a comparison to his...he should have been a champion tho..

Sam Langford and Charles Burley. Herol Graham was not better than Benn or Eubank, he kept his hands far two low and stuck his chin out there. He didn't deserve a title show because he lost to Jackson and Jackson was the more deserving fighter.

What I have read from Boxing history the answer is, Charley Burley. Did Burley never win it at Middleweight either,if not he gets my vote for sure.

I gota go with with Ray Mercer he was robbed against Lewis

Howard Davis Jr. Olympic gold.

Langford and Burley.

Sam Langford and Charley Burley are two greats who never won world titles. Heavyweights: Peter Jackson, Harry Wills, Jerry Quarry, Ken Norton (never won a real one), Jimmy Young, David Tua (KO'd 3 world champions), maybe Golota, Ibeabuchi... there are too many to mention really. Charley Burley

yall are retarded, it's Sam Langford. I think the person who mentioned Burley is close enough not to be retarded.

yall are retarded, it's Sam Langford.Co-sign...

yall are retarded, it's Sam Langford.

David Tua!!!

For me its Herol 'the bomber' Graham. he should have gotten the decision against mccallum. he was better than benn n eubank imo who were titlist at the time At one weight class or lifetime? So far, Pacquiao at 130 makes a pretty good case as the best fighter at 130 to never win a world title.