Marco Antonio Barrera vs Erik Morales 2

to me the trilogy results were simple 1st fight barera won, close fight but he produced more effective aggression 2ns fight morales won, great performance from him and he won by 3 rounds imo 3rd fight barera won and showed his class :boxing: Yea in the third fight Barera won hands down!:boxing:

to me the trilogy results were simple 1st fight barera won, close fight but he produced more effective aggression 2ns fight morales won, great performance from him and he won by 3 rounds imo 3rd fight barera won and showed his class

el terrible...i think he never got to his full potential....when he was on the rise, he lacked defense....when he got defense, he was already losing legs... when you take punishment even early in career it take over you sometime even with the weight drainage all this stuff. That is why there is possiablity Paul Williams is going to get shot quick IMO. I think he should move up in weigh pretty fast and not wait too long because then it will effect later in his career.

el terrible...i think he never got to his full potential....when he was on the rise, he lacked defense....when he got defense, he was already losing legs...

Morales won the second war. Barrera won the frist. IMO I thought Morales won the second fight and I thought Barrera won the first fight. I think Barrera won the first but it was a close fight that could go favouring Morales too. but Morales clearly won the 2nd fight

i thought the first fight was a draw and that Morales won the second. Barrera won the 3rd. Its no question though, Barrera ruined Morales. :boxing: Now using this fight as an example!! Do you think we need to sort the way some of these fights are judged? I know it was a few years ago but these dodgy decisions still go at top level.:boxing:

i thought the first fight was a draw and that Morales won the second. Barrera won the 3rd. Its no question though, Barrera ruined Morales.

Morales won that fight, plain and simple.

Morales got the second one.If u add up all rounds in the 3 fights morales won the war

Morales won the second war. Barrera won the frist. IMO Correct. The first fight should have been a split dec given to Marco. The 2nd fight should have been given split dec to my man El Terrible. Erik boxed a great fight that night. Marco did not deserve to win.

morales won both the first and second fight but lost the third. agreed.....................

morales won both the first and second fight but lost the third.

morales won..............clearly......

I was at the fight and bet money on Barrera, I clearly thought he lost the fight and thought for sure my money was gone. The consensus with talking to the people around me was the same. :boxing: That about says it all m8:boxing:

I was at the fight and bet money on Barrera, I clearly thought he lost the fight and thought for sure my money was gone. The consensus with talking to the people around me was the same.

There was Quite alot of Foul play m8..What i meant, Just taking that into account, And the way Morales fought..IMO has him the winner!! i remember watching it a few years back and scoring a draw, i was lucky enough to be at the third fight, again it was close but no argument barrera won

one of the greatest trilogies in history, i think your over emphasising the fouling a bit though. i wouldnt of argued with a draw There was Quite alot of Foul play m8..What i meant, Just taking that into account, And the way Morales fought..IMO has him the winner!!

I aswell thought that Morales one the secound! Just gonna watch the 3rd now.

I thought Morales won the second fight and I thought Barrera won the first fight.

Morales won the second war. Barrera won the frist. IMO