calzaghe could have boxed in any era

ive heard this statement several times...do you agree? i definately think this is accurate...not saying he would have been as dominant in other era's but he would have been an important fighter... Calzaghe is a very special fighter, he is hands down the greatest Super Middleweight of all time. There is no doubt in my mind that Calzaghe would be a great fighter in any era.

i dont see why he couldnt have, i dont rate his resume much, but you see that hes got the skills and the tools and he can take a good shot.

lol...Ive heard it all now. misplaced sarcasm of the century...:nonono:

I agree full with this thread, in a head to head sense he is vastly underrated, and would've been a handful(or able to beat) quite a few.

lol...Ive heard it all now. Give me one reason why he wouldnt be up there? Some of your guys make me sick with your stupids statements... How can a 10yr unbeaten world champion not be considered when condiering boxers from all eras?? I want you to answer this with a proper answer !

lol...Ive heard it all now. I would love to see your top 10 p4p list, or your GOAT list.

...you know what i meant by boxed in any era..i personally think he wouldve fitted into the hagler hearns leonard era nicely!

oh ya man i was getting to it forgot! lol its cool, im putting mine in now.

ANy fucking fighter coulda fought in any another era dummy... who cares! are we putting the bet in our sig or what? (Taylor-Pavlik)