Those would also beat Mayweather....i was jsut describing those who are similar to Pryor....also the Chavez/Duran type would beat Mayweather...(please dont bring up Whitaker-Chavez....Floyd's main asset is his foot speed which those 2 fighters could pretty much control by cutting off the ring and timing, Whitaker used upper body and head movement to beat chavez...and Floyd isnt nearly as good in that...)
I have to disagree Floyd is as fast with his upper body and his head movement and reflexes as he is with his feet.
Possibly.
But ....
A tall power puncher was supposed to beat Floyd. Then a pressure, bodypuncher, then a brawling warrior, then a speedy athletic guy, then a big rugged guy, and then a left-hooking power puncher. None of those seemed to crack the defense yet.
I say it's the Winky/Forrest type that does it.
Those would also beat Mayweather....i was jsut describing those who are similar to Pryor....also the Chavez/Duran type would beat Mayweather...(please dont bring up Whitaker-Chavez....Floyd's main asset is his foot speed which those 2 fighters could pretty much control by cutting off the ring and timing, Whitaker used upper body and head movement to beat chavez...and Floyd isnt nearly as good in that...)
They didnt have the luxury of rewind and slow motion ,,, you should try it Wiley you will be surprised what you actually see to what you thought you saw in lots of fights , and then just follow the rules of boxing in scoring punches that actually land in a scoring zone,
You will find as we go along Im pretty real about things , they are just fighters to me , I want to know what really happened in a fight so I watch it very closely , its called checking the form , I used to go to horse and dog trials for the very same reasons , and you say Im ignorant sheeez grow up mate .
The judges "didn't have the luxery of slow mo and rewind?" Not only are you the Kreskin of the site with your boxing omnicience, but you've even got it over the judges now. "Rodbarker" the final voice in boxing.
God man. Get some sleep, you are really sounding ridiculous. Even the most avid Mayweatherite would admit to himself, if not the world, that Floyd struggled with Oscar. Don't discredit yourself so.
Why you so intent of pumping one champ up at the expense of another only to try and bag Floyd ,,, they are all fucking champions you dickhead
You're the one pumping up these over the hill has beens to try and make Floyd look better than he is. Floyd is talented, sure, but he fights like he's worried about smudging his makeup.
They didnt have the luxury of rewind and slow motion ,,, you should try it Wiley you will be surprised what you actually see to what you thought you saw in lots of fights , and then just follow the rules of boxing in scoring punches that actually land in a scoring zone,
You will find as we go along Im pretty real about things , they are just fighters to me , I want to know what really happened in a fight so I watch it very closely , its called checking the form , I used to go to horse and dog trials for the very same reasons , and you say Im ignorant sheeez grow up mate .
Sorry, it was a boring enough fight in realtime. S l o w i n g it down, now that's just torture.
Rod,
Notice how when Shane wins a split decision, he "owned" Oscar. But when Floyd wins a split decision, he "struggled".
:poke:
The second fight, the one you like so much apparently, was UNANIMOUS. And yes, he fought him twice, beat him twice, that's OWNED.
If you think for one minute Floyd stuggled with Oscar your a kennel blind fool or you dont have rewind and slow motion on your DVD recorder .
Now your ignorance has been revealed to the world. I cannot believe you said that.
I believe the judges had a split decision if memory serves. Yeah, I'd say Mayweather "struggled" against Oscar.
If you think for one minute Floyd stuggled with Oscar your a kennel blind fool or you dont have rewind and slow motion on your DVD recorder .
You're right, it was a brilliant, exciting, dominating performance by Floyd, ROFL.
Well, anybody with a functional TV saw that Shane turned down a Mayweather fight during the Vargas post-fight interview ("Jin wants to go on vacation...my tooth").
And SSM has turned down previous FMJ offers. So, perhaps SSM wasn't as certain of a win as some NSB posters are,
In all fairness, SSM turned down the offer at 135 to go get that Oscar fight at 147. Probaby the last smart career move he made.
Well the Oscar that Mosley OWNED was definitely a lot younger, fitter, faster, etc than the one Mayweather STRUGGLED with, that's for sure.
You've been selectively correcting grammar and spelling all night. Including errors that are not really there.
Odd.
Stop stalking him you little twit. Anybody you deem not to be a Mayweather fan, you have to attack in your pedantic school masterish way.
Odd.
You've been selectively correcting grammar and spelling all night. Including errors that are not really there.
Odd.
I believe you started correcting me, REMEMBER?
Ah well you may get your wish , I see Floyd beating Hatton and fighting the winner of Mosely Cotto ,, Floyd wins now but Shane in his prime at 140 its a pickem that I wouldnt argue one way or other ,,, if you want to argue about the now bit start me up Dec 9 if you like :)
A few minutes ago you said a prime Mosley COULD NOT beat Mayweather, now its a pickem. I'll hit you up Dec 9 though.
Ah well you may get your wish , I see Floyd beating Hatton and fighting the winner of Mosely Cotto ,, Floyd wins now but Shane in his prime at 140 its a pickem that I wouldnt argue one way or other ,,, if you want to argue about the now bit start me up Dec 9 if you like :)
I don't think that's his "wish." I would think it's more like reasonable expectation based upon past performance.