seriously people, debating whether or not corrie sanders can or will defeat the klitschko is an idiotic waste of time for everyone involved...
do some freakin research before you start typing out of your asses!
look, everyone here says that corrie sanders was a big flat slob when he fought vitali and that was why he lost.....
when he defeated wlad he was 37 years old and weighed 225 pounds
when he got his ass kicked by vitali he weighed 235 pounds.....
do the math, 10 pounds was all it took to change sanders from the best shape of his career to the worst shape of his career.... thats a fact
now, since none of you guys bothered i guess its my great pleasure to inform you that in his previous bout the now 41-year old sanders weighed in against colin wilson at an absolutely astounding 258 3/4 pounds..
hey, thats only 23.75 pounds more than when he fought vitali and looked like a fat tun of shit.... man this guy must be serious about this comeback....
if you take corrie sanders as a serious threat to either klitschko then you are as dumb or dumber, and equally adept at ignoring the facts as a guy named george bush
Corrie Sanders is my boy (see avatar) but I really don't see him beating Wlad again at this stage of their respective careers. I think Sanders would take a pretty bad ass whopping actually, but hey, prove me wrong Corrie.
why are people taking this 42 year old golfer seriously as a boxer?
that 42 yr old golfer knocked out 18 opponents in the first round including al cole who went the distance with rahman,,kirk johsnon twice..witherspoon etc...at 42 and after taking the beating he took from vitali,,,,he probably would lose to even briggs,,valuev and maskeav but he still would be a threat becuase of his punch
Sanders would have the psychological edge going into this fight. Unfortunately his inactivity and overall being out of shape cost him this fight. I'd expect Wladimir to maybe be a bit tenative at first, but, he'd probably octopus Sanders to death so to prevent another upset. Then when Sanders is tired and spent, he would get TKO/KO'ed (Was watching V. Klitschko vs. Sanders yesterday. Forgot how strong Sanders chin is, he took some shots! After that beating, I don't see why he'd want anymore of Vitali heh).
Sanders would have the psychological edge going into this fight. But being inactive and much more out of shape these days costs him this fight. Klitschko would probably octopus Sanders to death so the same result in the first fight wouldn't happen. Then after Sanders is tired and spent, he would get brutally TKO/KO'ed.
I was actually watching V. Klitschko vs. Sanders yesterday and man, does Sanders have a chin. After the beating he got, I don't see why he'd want any more of Vitali.
It doesn't really matter if Sanders can beat the Klitschko's or not. He did beat Wlad and he can do it again. All that matters though is if the fight is going to happen, because right now it's all pure speculation.
it would be a long shot for sanders to win against wlad in this stage of there careers. I would have even favored wlad 4 years ago in a rematch. he just walked straight forward showing no respect and he got caught the first time. he didnt use his jab much,,,,didnt tie up on the inside,all he'd have to do is box the way he has his last 3 fights and sanders would tire and get taken out
It doesn't really matter if Sanders can beat the Klitschko's or not. He did beat Wlad and he can do it again. All that matters though is if the fight is going to happen, because right now it's all pure speculation.
What you typed may all be true as far as numbers, but saying that the ten pounds is why he lost is not a fact. Do your research and look up the word 'fallacy'
i didnt say that was why he lost, just about everyone else did, which is what i stated, personally i just thought he wasnt good enough
my point was the ten pounds was all it took to take him from excellent shape (against wlad) to bad shape (against vitali)
merely trying to put into perspective how bad he will look with another 20 pounds of fat stacked on top of that
seriously people, debating whether or not corrie sanders can or will defeat the klitschko is an idiotic waste of time for everyone involved...
do some freakin research before you start typing out of your asses!
look, everyone here says that corrie sanders was a big flat slob when he fought vitali and that was why he lost.....
when he defeated wlad he was 37 years old and weighed 225 pounds
when he got his ass kicked by vitali he weighed 235 pounds.....
do the math, 10 pounds was all it took to change sanders from the best shape of his career to the worst shape of his career.... thats a fact
now, since none of you guys bothered i guess its my great pleasure to inform you that in his previous bout the now 41-year old sanders weighed in against colin wilson at an absolutely astounding 258 3/4 pounds..
hey, thats only 23.75 pounds more than when he fought vitali and looked like a fat tun of shit.... man this guy must be serious about this comeback....
if you take corrie sanders as a serious threat to either klitschko then you are as dumb or dumber, and equally adept at ignoring the facts as a guy named george bush
What you typed may all be true as far as numbers, but saying that the ten pounds is why he lost is not a fact. Do your research and look up the word 'fallacy'
what the fuck are you talking about idiot
u dont know shit
lol, this coming from the guy who calls a 41 year old 259 pound semi-retiredsanders "the most talented heavyweight out there"
not to mention you said he should be a cruiserweight, lol, he is 6'4 225 in his best shape.... yet again showing that you are the one who truly doesent know shit
what the fuck are you talking about idiot, he never defeated vitali..
u dont know shit
that was a typo dipshit, you couldve figured it out for yourself and saved your sorry ass reply for someone else
seriously people, debating whether or not corrie sanders can or will defeat the klitschko is an idiotic waste of time for everyone involved...
do some freakin research before you start typing out of your asses!
look, everyone here says that corrie sanders was a big flat slob when he fought vitali and that was why he lost.....
when he defeated wlad he was 37 years old and weighed 225 pounds
when he defeated vitali he weighed 235 pounds.....
do the math, 10 pounds was all it took to change sanders from the best shape of his career to the worst shape of his career.... thats a fact
now, since none of you guys bothered i guess its my great pleasure to inform you that in his previous bout the now 41-year old sanders weighed in against colin wilson at an absolutely astounding 258 3/4 pounds..
hey, thats only 23.75 pounds more than when he fought vitali and looked like a fat tun of shit.... man this guy must be serious about this comeback....
if you take corrie sanders as a serious threat to either klitschko then you are as dumb or dumber, and equally adept at ignoring the facts as a guy named george bush
what the fuck are you talking about idiot, he never defeated vitali..
u dont know shit