biggest hw title mess!

look at the FOUR (yes, four. not one, or two, or three. fucking four) we have today: Lamon Brewster (no skill, big punch), Nicolay Valuev (freak show), Chris the duck Byrd (do i really have to say?), Hasim Rahman (one puncher wonder, joke). how can anyone say that any other era is/was worse than this era?

doesn't look like anybody's gonna vote for '68-'71. i guess cause you had two top 5 all-time hws at that time.

now is definitely the worst , i mean a circus freak who has absolutely no boxing ability or talent is a heavyweight champion . that says it all dosent it .

who ever voted 84-88 is dumb cause that when tyson ruled the belts pretty much besides 84

right now, theyve all been messes, but theyve had better quality fighters (except in mtj's case, but at least then they had one good hw) id rather watch all time greats struggle with eachother than guys who should not hold a belt in a reasonable period of time for HW's

We are witnessing it right now!!!

This is the worst crop of Heavyweights I can remember, so it makes me noxious when I hear people that want to add a Super Heavyweight division.

well, there is muhammad ali, joe frazier, and jimmy ellis holding part of the belt in 1968-1971. also there are people like mike tyson, michael spinks, trevor berbick, james "bonecrusher" smith, and tony tucker holding belts in 1984-1988, and finally people like nicolay valuev, james toney, vladimir klitchko, and lamon brewster having belts from 2000-today. make your vote count, people. which time period was worse?

You're in it.

actually, i meant to say in the poll 1968-1971. i made a mistake. oh, well. :o

IMO, right now is a little naff.