Originally posted by Bengali Boxer
View Post
Originally posted by qwerty07
View Post
I mean I guess that could hold true for HW's. Seeing that back in the day the top HW's rareley weight more than 225 pounds. While now is rare to see a top HW who weighs less then 225 pounds.
But, back then a WW weighed 147, today a WW weights 147. Where is the bigger and stronger coming from? A MW now weighs 160 a MW 100 years weigh in at 160. And, you can do that for every weight-class except HW I give you that.
I have not seen a faster fighter yet then Camacho or Taylor. so how are fighters from today faster?
And, honestly can't really say that Floyd was faster than SRR, maybe had better reflexes I give you that. But, SRR had very good speed.
As for as skills that again is not true. Go look at the top 10 P4P list of 30 years ago.
Ray Leonard,
Thomas Hearns
Roberto Duran
Alexis Argeullo
Marving Hagler
Salvador Sancehz
Wilfredo Gomez
Aaron Pryor
Wilfredo Benitez
Jeff Chandler
Compared that to todays top 10 P4P fighters.
Pac
Floyd
Donaire
JMM
Caballero
Mosley
P-Will
Dawson
Wonjongkam
Martinez
Tell me which P4P list overall has the better skilled fighters?
Now for the styles comment. Again that is not true. The styles from back then will work in today era. Look at George Benton for example
tell me if George Benton style is not similar to a very elite fighter of this era?
Go look at Charles Burley style
Are you saying this style and skill set would not be effective in this era?
Hell go even look at Primo Carnera style. And, tell me is not like watching Vitaly Klitschko.
And, look at Carnera size. He was 6'5 255-265 pounds, reach was 85 inches. Now compare that to Vitaly who is 6'7 245-250 pound with a reach of 80 inches.
Don't tell me that today's fighters in any way shape and form are better then fighters from back then.
Comment