Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A trick question regarding boxing and genetics

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Dempsey-Louis View Post
    Syrian rowing? Samoan gymnastics? How about American curling? - Ha, Ha, Ha, oh,wait! Never mind.
    Curling is defined as the following:

    Proof that God exists in so far as he has to have a sense of humor and must therefore exist.

    Comment


    • #42
      There was a Simpsons episode where Marge became a champion curler haha.

      Comment


      • #43
        Oh yeah and why is this a trick question?

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Anthony342 View Post
          Oh yeah and why is this a trick question?
          Good question, Just caught this...

          Its a trick question because its one of those things that is counter intuitive. If we want to guarantee a supply of the fastest, handsomest, strongest...... its the same answer as guaranteeing a supply of the slowess, ugliest, weakest. We want the most people so we get the most people in each range, then social factors are maximized.

          of course this is hypothetical, we can't separate people from social forces but we can understand how the mechanisms work that determine our evolution and strength/weakness as a species.

          Comment


          • #45
            Another vote for China. They don't fool around when they take a sport seriously they dominate it.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Mastrangelo
              When boxing gets really big in China one day, they take over.
              Originally posted by billeau2 View Post
              Bingo!

              China or India... The question is: with no social enticements who would produce the most and best professional fighters.

              And while everyone can create closure putting humor into it, (a welcome response frankly), or their own ideations, its really a math problem. The country with the most people will produce the most of everything: Genetic diversity included... And will subsequently produce the most able bodied individuals...as well as the LEAST able bodied individuals.

              Now I will leave it up to the gang here, who have the IQ and boxing knowledge cornered, to draw the proper conclusion regarding race and so called genetic markers when looking at this situation objectively!
              China was the first country that came into my mind when I read your question. They have more people than any other country. So, if everything else was equal, they would have more pro boxers, leading to more elite level boxers and therefore more world champions than any other country.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Anthony342 View Post
                Speaking of genetics, why do Kenyans usually win most marathons here in the US?
                Originally posted by billeau2 View Post
                Most winners are because of cultural things that produce the skill set needed. A Kenyan was asked this very question and explained how, from an early age they are taught to run everywhere as kids.
                Kenyans don't like to admit it, because they believe it detracts attention from the effort they need to put in to succeed, but being born and raised at high altitude is a major factor in that success:

                "A shared characteristic of the Kenyan and Ethiopian
                distance runners is the fact that most of them were born
                and raised at an elevation of approximately 2000 to 2500
                m in eastern Africa. About 75% of Kenya’s best runners
                come from just 1 of the country’s 40 tribes, the Kalenjin,
                who comprise approximately 10% of the total Kenyan
                population.

                The Kalenjin have lived for centuries on the western rim of the Great Rift Valley, which is the distinct geological formation running through Kenya in a north–south direction that separates the western third of Kenya from the rest of the country. The Kalenjin homeland is an area of rolling green hills located in the Great Rift region at an elevation ranging from 1830 to 2450 m."

                https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/517...b1de7f905a.pdf

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                  China was the first country that came into my mind when I read your question. They have more people than any other country. So, if everything else was equal, they would have more pro boxers, leading to more elite level boxers and therefore more world champions than any other country.
                  Its really that simple. Of course it is a hypothetical, but it shows how biological destiny follows mathmatical laws. One could ask how we know this is true...thats a fair question.

                  If we deconstruct all the incidents of boxing superiority we will always find things like a concern for the sport, training facilities, historical events that act as causes, etc. Black fighters who are superior in the United States...

                  Well its horrible but, when slave traders took human cargo, they did not take the slow, fat, stupid individuals...they took the strong, able bodied, cunning individuals. When Irish fighters were prominent, Only the strong, rich or lucky survived during the potato famine.

                  Noe Kafkod these examples are simplifications but, they show a good reason for a population of fighting men that have nothing to do with superior racial properties. People sometimes point out that the IQ of different races is proof: Well historically we have to distinguish which period of history...During the Afro-Hamitic period where the great African Kingdoms existed with Egypy, the Africans were the math wizzes, the sophisticants, ect.

                  Even in the West? During the 18 hundreds the Greeks were believed to be passionate, capricious people with no intellectual currency to speak of. The Egyptians were thought of as the intellectual foundation of Western culture. Then in the next century? When German thinkers studied Greek philosophers, suddenly the Greeks became the "thinkers" and foundation of Western thought and ideology!

                  Almost every racial stereo type is based on skin color, one genetic variant, and can be explained by other considerations.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                    Kenyans don't like to admit it, because they believe it detracts attention from the effort they need to put in to succeed, but being born and raised at high altitude is a major factor in that success:

                    "A shared characteristic of the Kenyan and Ethiopian
                    distance runners is the fact that most of them were born
                    and raised at an elevation of approximately 2000 to 2500
                    m in eastern Africa. About 75% of Kenya’s best runners
                    come from just 1 of the country’s 40 tribes, the Kalenjin,
                    who comprise approximately 10% of the total Kenyan
                    population.

                    The Kalenjin have lived for centuries on the western rim of the Great Rift Valley, which is the distinct geological formation running through Kenya in a north–south direction that separates the western third of Kenya from the rest of the country. The Kalenjin homeland is an area of rolling green hills located in the Great Rift region at an elevation ranging from 1830 to 2450 m."

                    https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/517...b1de7f905a.pdf
                    Absolutely. Perfect example...The running monks, the Greek Marathon runners, etc. As a side note I remember coming to New Mexico and on a dare running up a mountain side...being young dumb and full of cummm. And suddenly seeing chrome bubbles and stars feeling like a cartoon character getting slugged.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by billeau2 View Post
                      Its really that simple. Of course it is a hypothetical, but it shows how biological destiny follows mathmatical laws. One could ask how we know this is true...thats a fair question.

                      If we deconstruct all the incidents of boxing superiority we will always find things like a concern for the sport, training facilities, historical events that act as causes, etc. Black fighters who are superior in the United States...

                      Well its horrible but, when slave traders took human cargo, they did not take the slow, fat, stupid individuals...they took the strong, able bodied, cunning individuals. When Irish fighters were prominent, Only the strong, rich or lucky survived during the potato famine.

                      Noe Kafkod these examples are simplifications but, they show a good reason for a population of fighting men that have nothing to do with superior racial properties. People sometimes point out that the IQ of different races is proof: Well historically we have to distinguish which period of history...During the Afro-Hamitic period where the great African Kingdoms existed with Egypy, the Africans were the math wizzes, the sophisticants, ect.

                      Even in the West? During the 18 hundreds the Greeks were believed to be passionate, capricious people with no intellectual currency to speak of. The Egyptians were thought of as the intellectual foundation of Western culture. Then in the next century? When German thinkers studied Greek philosophers, suddenly the Greeks became the "thinkers" and foundation of Western thought and ideology!

                      Almost every racial stereo type is based on skin color, one genetic variant, and can be explained by other considerations.
                      I read a study about the value of dividing people by "race" before testing their IQs, then assigning each race its own average IQ score. The conclusion was that this is a pointless and misleading excercise with no scientific value whatsoever.

                      Even if cultural factors are ignored, genetic evidence clearly tells us that race and intelligence are not controlled by the same sets of genes. Which means that statistics which may be accurate for one population, at one point in time, are not necessarily going to be accurate for other populations at other points in time.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP