Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin Disagrees With Canelo's Stance on 'Title' For Trilogy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Well canelo has gggs titles though. Andrade will be too chicken to fight so there won’t be any title to get a hold of for ol grovelkin

    Comment


    • #82
      It's official , straight from Golovkin's mouth he doesn't care & never cared about legacy/belt's. He ducked Dereyevchencko, Charlo & Andrade.

      CANELO should continue to cement his legacy and go for Undisputed at 160 &
      Undisputed #1 P4P.

      Then fight Golovkin with NO BELTS ON THE LINE.

      Put the final nail in Golovkin's coffin.⚰🔨

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
        did you not read my original post? I think rolls is a joke of an opponent just like it was when he fought Wade. And just like it was when canelo fought khan, fielding and others. I'm a boxing fan, not a lil cheerleading bi**h like you who says dumb s*** nonstop just to try and defend a fighter you have a crush on or make them seem better than what they are. Most recent example is you saying Canelo won clean in the rematch and there was no controversy. The dude won a split decision by 1 round (on 2 cards) and only 2 of 50 on press row had him winning. That's not controversial?? Maybe not in your fan obsessed groupie heart.



        nope, not to me

        I saw a clear win

        I saw that one guy was able to fight his fight, effectively..... and the other guy, was not able to fight his fight effectively

        I saw one guy follow his gameplan perfectly, and adjust..... while the other guy could not follow his gameplan, and did not adjust

        I saw one guy control the fight and win the exchanges with BETTER eye-catching judge-friendly punches.....

        and the guy who did all of that also exhibited better defence than his opponent, as well as better skills

        I have no doubt whatsoever who the better fighter is..... none

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Themanager View Post
          This story is a joke! Golovkin had the perfect opportunity to fight Canelo in September and he blew it! Canelo told him all he had to do was agree to fight Andrade (who was ALSO available immediately) and get the WBO belt and Canelo would fight GGG in September to become the undisputed champion of the world and GGG was too scared and refused to fight Andrade! That is a fact! They were offered it and they made up all kinds of bull***t excuses!! Able Sanchez knew Andrade would beat him and told everyone it's because Andrade didn't train hard enough!!! and didn't bring anything to the table (even though over a year ago Sanchez publicly told the world that Andrade would not only beat Canelo he would "make him look ******" )and GGG and his team took the easy way out. Now the only way GGG possibly gets the September rematch is if Jacobs wins because if Canelo wins he's already said he's going to unify and GGG can sit back and watch it happen. Say what you want about Canelo but he's got guts! He is willing to fight anyone! period!



          and they did the same thing with Charlo

          walked away from an eliminator, despite the fact that Canelo would be ordered to fight the winner

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Mirus View Post
            It is bad for GGG if he keeps asking for a clen fight. Hate GGG for begging a clen money. GGG is a king without clen. He beat clen twice already. Just keep fighting against the bests. Fight Charlo and Andrade. Forget about canelita. Aren't you a sportsman? Why are you begging for money? You already beat clen twice! Stop dreaming a clen fight! Move on!


            because Canelo is his sugar daddy, and because his other options are too dangerous

            Golovkin will lose the trilogy fight to Canelo, and he knows it

            they want to cash that cheque and run, with no embarrassing hiccups against Andrade or Charlo etc

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by REYESdelBOXEO View Post
              It's official , straight from Golovkin's mouth he doesn't care & never cared about legacy/belt's. He ducked Dereyevchencko, Charlo & Andrade.

              CANELO should continue to cement his legacy and go for Undisputed at 160 &
              Undisputed #1 P4P.

              Then fight Golovkin with NO BELTS ON THE LINE.

              Put the final nail in Golovkin's coffin.⚰��



              Canelo should select Andrade next

              then Golovkin would select..... who ?

              we know he aint gonna fight a live dog

              how will his faithful defenders justify a 2nd consecutive no-hoper?

              Canelo should be true to his word and fight the other champions

              Andrade, then Brant..... Golovkin can fight Steve Rolls little brother, and then pull out Vanes for another crack

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                Canelo should select Andrade next

                then Golovkin would select..... who ?

                we know he aint gonna fight a live dog

                how will his faithful defenders justify a 2nd consecutive no-hoper?

                Canelo should be true to his word and fight the other champions

                Andrade, then Brant..... Golovkin can fight Steve Rolls little brother, and then pull out Vanes for another crack
                Yeah I agree , CANELO should fight Andrade next , he should bring in Austin Trout into camp for sparring to help prepare him for Andrade. So you prefer Brant after Andrade? Brant over Charlo?
                If CANELO can pull it off & become Undisputed, I think he should go for grudge match fights like: Charlo, Hurd , Spence & Crawford.

                I think Golovkin is going to continue to use CANELO's name to promote his extremely low risk fight's. Let's not forget Golovkin just turned down a CANELO fight to & picked a fight with guy basically ranked #100 lol

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                  because Canelo is his sugar daddy, and because his other options are too dangerous

                  Golovkin will lose the trilogy fight to Canelo, and he knows it

                  they want to cash that cheque and run, with no embarrassing hiccups against Andrade or Charlo etc
                  Agree. 100%

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                    There is no way this fight isn't going to happen. Both guys make the most possible money by fighting the other guy. DAZN has invested heavily in both fighter so there will be a big push for it to happen. Then there is the matter of pride. Both guys want a definite victory over the other man.
                    Totally hate free, sensible post. Why are you on a Trip G/Canelo thread?

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                      nope, not to me

                      I saw a clear win

                      I saw that one guy was able to fight his fight, effectively..... and the other guy, was not able to fight his fight effectively

                      I saw one guy follow his gameplan perfectly, and adjust..... while the other guy could not follow his gameplan, and did not adjust

                      I saw one guy control the fight and win the exchanges with BETTER eye-catching judge-friendly punches.....

                      and the guy who did all of that also exhibited better defence than his opponent, as well as better skills

                      I have no doubt whatsoever who the better fighter is..... none
                      You're full of s*** is what you are. You watch fights strictly biased for the Mexican because if you didn't see ggg adjust in that fight then you're a complete moron. If you don't think it was controversial.. Again you're a f'ing moron.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP